Roger Simon's Hit-Job On Fred Thompson At The Politico
I thought I'd said all I was going to say about Roger Simon's article in The Politico yesterday afternoon in the comments at Hot Air, but as more comes out about the article, I think it is worthy of a dedicated post.
Simon (not the Roger L.Simon of Pajamas Media with whom I interviewed Fred Thompson in November) put up a post called Fred Thompson: Lazy as charged (bad link earlier, now fixed -ed). The article was damning—brutal, even—and highlighted what appeared to be a huge gaffe in his bus tour through Waverly, Iowa:Within the context of the rest of the article, Simon's snide editorial reference to the firemen being a "captive audience" would almost go unnoticed. His description of what happened next, however, used an unambiguously doctored quote. We know this because the events were captured in a video shown at CBS News (click image to watch): Simon quoted Thompson as stating that "I've got a silly hat rule." As the CBS video clearly showed, that was only part of Thompson's statement. What Thompson actually said was, "I've got a silly hat rule that I'm about to violate." Thompson then takes the Chief's helmet and starts to raise it if he is going to put it on, and then says, while laughing, "I ain't gonna do it... I ain't gonna do it." At this point Jeri Thompson steps in and Fred puts the helmet on her. Throughout the video, you can hear those assembled laughing, including Chief Dan McKenzie, who handed Thompson the helmet to begin with. McKenzie is shown smiling widely at the end of the clip. We don't know if the entire Politico article is grossly unfair in the way it characterized Senator Thompson's swing through Waverly, Iowa, but we do know, thanks to the CBS News video, that not only was Simon's editorializing of what occurred in the Waverly Fire Department mischaracterized, but that he doctored a quote to make his article appear all the more damning. Simon is the Chief Political Columnist for The Politico—one that they tout as one of "Washington's most visible and experienced journalists."— and should know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that doctoring quotes is highly unethical by any journalistic standard. In their mission statement, The Politico brags about those journalist they would empower:
...Thompson rode four blocks to the local fire station. Local fire stations always have captive audiences (unless there is a fire). Inside, Thompson shook a few hands — there were only about 15 people there — and then Chief Dan McKenzie handed Thompson the chief's fire hat so Thompson could put it on. Thompson looked at it with a sour expression on his face. "I've got a silly hat rule," Thompson said. In point of fact, the "silly" hat was the one Chief McKenzie wore to fires and I am guessing none of the firefighters in attendance considered it particularly silly, but Thompson was not going to put it on. He just stood there holding it and staring at it. To save the moment, Jeri Thompson took the hat from her husband’s hands and put it on her head. "You look cute," Thompson said to her. She did.
Though a doctored quote and a misrepresentation of events captured on camera, Roger Simon seems to have violated that difference between voice and advocacy that The Politico claims to represent. It remains to be seen if the senior editorial staff of The Politico will take this clear evidence of journalistic malpractice seriously. Update: I just sent the following to The Politico via their contact form:
Today, many of the reporters having the most impact are those whose work carries a unique signature, who add a distinct voice to the public conversation. Their work, in other words, matters more than where they work. Reporters stand out from the crowd in a number of ways. Some regularly break news before their competitors. Some have a gift for interpretation, for connecting the dots in illuminating ways. Still others stand out through their eloquence and original storytelling. Politico will promote and celebrate journalists who have a unique signature. That's why we've been able to attract reporters and editors who have worked at such places as Time magazine and The New York Times, National Public Radio, Roll Call and The Hill, Bloomberg News Service, the Philadelphia Inquirer, USA Today and The Washington Post. There is a difference, however, between voice and advocacy. That's one traditional journalism ideal we fully embrace. There is more need than ever for reporting that presents the news fairly, not through an ideological prism. One of the most distressing features of public life recently has been the demise of shared facts. Warring partisans -- many of whom take their news from sources that cater to and amplify their existing opinions -- live in separate zones of reality. In such a climate, every news story is viewed as either weapon or shield in a nonstop ideological war. Our answer to this will be journalism that insists on the primacy of facts over ideology.
I've also left voicemail for Chief Dan McKenzie at the Waverly, Iowa Fire Department, asking for his view of what occurred yesterday. I'd be very interested in seeing what both The Politico and Chief McKenzie have to say, and hope they take the time to respond. Update: Over at A Second Hand Conjecture, Michael W. notes that this is not the first time that Roger Simon of The Politico may have been caught using partial or non-existent quotes. If this is indeed the case, it seems a resignation, and not a retraction, is in order from Mr. Simon.
Roger Simon's "Fred Thompson: Lazy as charged" included a doctored quote. Simon states: "'I've got a silly hat rule,' Thompson said." That is factually incorrect. What Thompson said is "I've got a silly hat rule that I'm about to violate." Simon left off the entire second half of the quote, which was captured, in full, in the CBS News video that captured the event. You owe it it your readers to correct the record in Simon's story. I would ask you further what remedy you feel is worthy for a reporter that doctors quotes. Thank you.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:25 AM
Comments
And it wasn't just cutting off teh end o the quote. He completely mischaracterized the gathering. Forget Fred - you think a fireman would be unhappy to be next to that pretty babe? And she DID look cute as hell in the hat. Yummy.
Maybe Roger is jealous of Fred?
Anyways...another lie revealed. Thank you.
Posted by: sts at December 20, 2007 12:42 PM (vlZE0)
Is the Politico in the business of hiring deceitful morons?
Guess so.
Posted by: Anne Deupree at December 20, 2007 12:58 PM (UvFne)
Posted by: TBinSTL at December 20, 2007 01:39 PM (soc2D)
Posted by: clazy at December 20, 2007 01:57 PM (EWsFM)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at December 20, 2007 01:58 PM (vxbTC)
Posted by: clazy at December 20, 2007 01:58 PM (EWsFM)
I don't remember which of their phony journalists it was -- not Fabricating Frank Foer, because I'd remember if it was his byline. One of the others... Ruth Shalit?
Posted by: Kevin R.C. O'Brien at December 20, 2007 02:16 PM (IDmXv)
(Note that Hillary's campaign is traveling by helicopter across Iowa, according to a chicago tribune article I cannot link to due to the comments engine)
The Hillary article mentions the snow storm that hit Eastern Iowa, and a search on google map reveals that Waverly is, in fact, in Eastern Iowa.
Posted by: mjh at December 20, 2007 02:17 PM (nwkAN)
This is not journalism. It is fiction. And should rightly be labeled as such. It looks like there is coming a time when the MSM is going to have to start putting ratings on their stories like Hollywood productions.
Posted by: Gomez at December 20, 2007 02:44 PM (n+Fxi)
He decided to show them a thing or two . . . "Never pick a fight with a fellow who buys ink by the barrel," the old saying went. Update to " . . . who buys bandwidth by the terabyte."
I mean, how picky is it to criticize Thompson for not walking down Main Street? Simon claimed there were shoppers in one of the stores he could have greeted . . . the whole piece is a hit job. Extremely unprofessional.
Posted by: Jim Addison at December 20, 2007 02:46 PM (uqc7t)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at December 20, 2007 03:11 PM (Lgw9b)
Posted by: Jake at December 20, 2007 03:42 PM (/RueP)
On that note, I don't think that the Politico has much sway in the Republican primary and thus I don't know how much effect this article will have. Whenever media like this try something like this it almost always hurts them more than the person they are trying to hurt themselves.
I think the Politico's reputation will take a much bigger hit than the Thompson campaign.
I will point out that Thompson is by no means the only Rep to be the subject of a hit piece.
Here is my analysis of a hit piece on Rudy...
http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/hatchet-job-masquerading-as-political.html
Posted by: Mike Volpe at December 20, 2007 04:04 PM (86F5q)
I think that the media hurts themselves a lot more than their intended target when they try nonsense like this.
I would also point out that Thompson is not the only Republican to have a hit piece directed at them. I think most have. Here is my analysis of a hit piece on Rudy...
http://proprietornation.blogspot.com/2007/10/hatchet-job-masquerading-as-political.html
Posted by: Mike Volpe at December 20, 2007 04:08 PM (86F5q)
Simon expects all politicians to conform to his and his colleagues' (extremely tired old) standards for how granular, local, "retail" politics ought to be done, and is done, in Iowa. We've all been reading the same damn stories about Candidate X eating the damned corned dog or Candidate Y kissing the baby for at least the last six elections, haven't we? That's their narrative.
To use a phrase that Fred's also recently used in Iowa, reporters like Simon want the candidates to "behave" (i.e., comply) like "trained monkeys, performing on command" -- and that includes giving (self-)important reporters like Simon practically unlimited access to the candidates everywhere they go.
Comes now Fred Dalton Thompson, a dignified and serious man who (politely, jokingly, and very wisely) refuses to wear the damned fireman's hat himself; who doesn't see fit to include big internet reporter Simon in his face-to-face meeting with a local newspaper editor; and who perhaps has other priorities right now than walking up and down snowy streets of a tiny town trying to find a small handful of locals who might possibly have a baby he can kiss, or a corned dog, or whatever.
Confronted with such "non-cooperation," then it's out with the truth, and on with the narrative ("Fred's lazy, it's true, I saw it with my own eyes, and who are you going to believe, me or that lying videotape?")
Fred has a spine. He won't pander. That puzzles and even confuses some people, but I think voters will ultimately recognize that it makes him a better candidate to actually be president (even if he's not the press corps' ideal campaigner).
Posted by: Beldar at December 20, 2007 04:22 PM (kLHPS)
Seems he is doing the same thing here, and, as Beldar points out, the MSM is peeved about it.
It will be interesting to see how the people that really matter--that is, the voters, not the talking heads--view Thompson's approach.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 20, 2007 07:38 PM (4tS0i)
Posted by: Frederick at December 20, 2007 07:49 PM (kz+BU)
Posted by: Boss429 at December 20, 2007 08:11 PM (Q1yM9)
Posted by: Tony B at December 20, 2007 10:06 PM (187Jq)
Posted by: Scrapiron at December 20, 2007 11:20 PM (d/RyS)
Posted by: C-C-G at December 20, 2007 11:27 PM (4tS0i)
The amputated quote does the job of indicting the author of the article well enough without grasping for straws by trying to analyze which word was being modified by "silly."
Silly hats in political campaigns go back a long, long way--one of the most famous is Calvin Coolidge in the Indian chief's headdress. Think also of Dukakis in the tank commander's helmet. These gaffes have been discussed again and again over the decades, and there's no doubt that Thompson actually meant a "silly hat" rule. There's also no doubt that the phrase is simply shorthand for "unusual headgear worn with the object of endearing oneself with a targeted voter bloc," rather than an attack on firefighters and their helmets.
Posted by: novanom at December 21, 2007 09:23 AM (sLvR2)
Posted by: Attack Monster at December 21, 2007 03:22 PM (kCcME)
Posted by: DLS at December 21, 2007 04:18 PM (Gxawq)
Aka, including the omission would not have salvaged the "gaffe."
Aka, all this hot air is over nothing.
Posted by: Nathan at December 21, 2007 04:26 PM (MM+8E)
Posted by: stuart at December 21, 2007 06:42 PM (DoFVu)
Posted by: Gina at December 21, 2007 06:50 PM (BUGEf)
Parsing the sentence is secondary, what should be of primary importance to this story is the fact that the sentence was cut off and thus taken out of context--very much out of context, in fact.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 21, 2007 08:29 PM (4tS0i)
Posted by: Matt Moran at December 21, 2007 09:32 PM (x+/7i)
The Politico has to decide if it's going to engineer an early death or not on whether it terminates this fraud and sets a clear standard for credible, ethical reporting. Lacking Simon's termination, there's no reason to read yet another tired Firedoglake-inspired liberal opinion blog.
Posted by: redherkey at December 21, 2007 10:39 PM (kjqFg)
Thompson knows he blundered. That's why he referred to the incident in his request for more money filmed on his bus in Iowa by saying "We don't raise our hands when we're told to and we don't wear hats that aren't our own." before putting on a cowboy hat that made him look like a drugstore cowboy.
There are three things that are totally overrated: Young women (That's the polite version.), imported beer and Fred Thompson.
Posted by: Richard Graham at December 22, 2007 09:52 AM (AiJXe)
Posted by: C-C-G at December 22, 2007 10:34 AM (4tS0i)
Best regards,
CThomas
Posted by: CThomas at December 22, 2007 11:55 AM (8t6dj)
State intelligently and cogently why my observations are wrong.
And remember, no smart-mouthing-just logic.
"I used to be disgusted, now I'm just amused." Anonymous although it may have been Elvis Costello.
Posted by: Richard Graham at December 22, 2007 01:03 PM (MI8jb)
Therefore, at the time he uttered it, he intended to break the rule he had just mentioned. I call your attention to the statement "Thompson then takes the Chief's helmet and starts to raise it if he is going to put it on," which appears above in the main article. Therefore, the statement is germane and should have been included.
That he later changed his mind has no bearing on his frame of mind at the time he uttered the statement... he is not prescient, he could not have known he'd change his mind at a later time.
Therefore, logically, the full quote should have been included.
Please do not take my sharp tongue (fingers?) as evidence that I lack a similarly sharp brain. Quite the opposite, my sharp brain empowers my sharp tongue (or fingers, as the case may be).
Good day, sir.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 22, 2007 03:12 PM (4tS0i)
Simple, Richard... Thompson did start to put the hat on, as reported above.
Therefore, at the time he uttered it, he intended to break the rule he had just mentioned. I call your attention to the statement "Thompson then takes the Chief's helmet and starts to raise it if he is going to put it on," which appears above in the main article. Therefore, the statement is germane and should have been included.
That he later changed his mind has no bearing on his frame of mind at the time he uttered the statement... he is not prescient, he could not have known he'd change his mind at a later time.
Therefore, logically, the full quote should have been included.
Please do not take my sharp tongue (fingers?) as evidence that I lack a similarly sharp brain. Quite the opposite, my sharp brain empowers my sharp tongue (or fingers, as the case may be).
Good day, sir.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 22, 2007 03:15 PM (4tS0i)
If you don't want bitchy responses, you should stop making such a bitchy comments.
Posted by: Doc Rampage at December 22, 2007 05:46 PM (yIpmv)
Posted by: Sandman at December 22, 2007 06:02 PM (1eTf8)
Right. He fully intended to, but two seconds later he discovered that the intention had gone away. Happens all the time. Disgraceful that Simon denied him credit for those two seconds of sincerity.
You *do* have a sharp brain, CCG!
Posted by: SqueakyRat at December 23, 2007 05:47 AM (w2PI5)
You are both fortunate to live in a country in which people such as yourselves are allowed to post opinions that sound as if they are 15 year girls having their first menstrual cycle. (I am guessing, perhaps wrongly, that you are both "male.".) You are both classic examples of what Rush Limbaugh calls the "chickification" of America.
Posted by: Richard Graham at December 23, 2007 07:43 AM (AiJXe)
Methinks thou dost protest too much.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 23, 2007 10:39 AM (4tS0i)
Posted by: Dave at December 23, 2007 10:44 AM (mVD0i)
Really, is this what following and debating campaigns is all about? Restaurant tips? Silly parsing rules, and endless high dudgeon?
It seems the MSM is not the only bastion of hypersensitive delight in the trivial.
Posted by: Pazuzu's Petals at December 23, 2007 10:55 AM (HPHFp)
Pot, meet kettle.
Posted by: C-C-G at December 23, 2007 11:16 AM (4tS0i)
I stand corrected. No commenter did mention it; just the author. I should have referrred to the ink spilled about the article in its entirety, not just that phrase.
My argument about the phrase stands - it's inoccuous.
As for the 'pot/kettle' trivial charge, CY put the phrase into play for discussion, and thus invited debate. So 'sloppy writing' - not 'trivial' - is the only accusation I'll accept from you.
Posted by: Pazuzu's Petals at December 25, 2007 03:43 PM (HPHFp)
To make it even simpler, while you are busily denouncing CY for his "angst" and so on, you are demonstrating your own "angst." Thereby proving that you are just as guilty of the errors you blame CY for.
Ergo, you are a pot, calling a kettle black.
Ain't logic wonderful?
Posted by: C-C-G at December 25, 2007 08:19 PM (4tS0i)
"The news quote was accurate because it reflected what happened. Thompson was too cowardly to put the hat on and he let his wife bail him out. Thompson should have put the hat on and been done with it. It's that simple. Now, we have another example of a candidate's supporters blaming the candidate's cowardice and stupidity on the media. That's why Thompson is a loser."
Replace the negative adjectives with positive ones and the comment would have the same value - zero. As was noted above, your post has nothing to object to because it IS nothing but a series of value judgments that have no objective backing. And using your logic, it's a catch-22 - Thompson's silly if he puts the hat on and cowardly if he doesn't. What kind of objectivity is THAT?
How do we determine that this misquote is more than just leaving out two seconds? Well, maybe it's because Roger Simon gets so much else wrong here. Example: Thompson's expression is not sour as Simon describes, it's half-laughing. Example: Later in the article, Simon refers to a Waverly Democrat reporter who calls Thompson's response to her question about farming "glittering generalities" (HER question was vague, and he said he would try to reduce subsidies on farming and support funding for soil/land conservation programs).
Thus we can see that Simon goes beyond simple bias to dishonesty.
By the way, your complaint about "smart-mouthing" seems misplaced given that you're busy calling the candidate a coward and a weakling, and given that unlike many smart-mouthers, these two didn't use theirs to cover for a lack of logic. What is generally objectionable about foul language is that it's used IN PLACE OF logic - Doc Rampage at least used the language to COMPLEMENT his logic.
Posted by: Math_Mage at December 25, 2007 10:45 PM (1NhoY)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0147 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0069 seconds, 55 records returned.
Page size 41 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.