When Journalists Attack
Quite a lot of people are ripping the behavior of Dallas, TX KDFW-TV reporter Rebecca Aquilar right now and deservedly so. The journalist ambushed 70-year-old Army veteran James Walton as he got into his car, and bullied him into tears. She has since been suspended.
Why? Walton is owner of Able Walton Machine & Welding in West Dallas, a salvage business where he lives in an upstairs apartment, that has been robbed no less than 42 times. On September 22, at about 2:00 AM, Walton shot a man who was breaking in through a pried-open window. The man later died. Three weeks later on October 14 at 9:00 AM, Walton shot and killed another thief who had broken in. After each shooting, Dallas police, as a matter of policy, processed each firearm used as evidence for the grand jury, meaning that a victimized Walton had to purchase yet another firearm with which to defend his life and besieged property. It was as he was leaving the store after purchasing this replacement shotgun (a Remington according to the box markings) that Aquilar staged her ambush:Stereotypes become stereotypes because of behavior recreated and witnessed enough times that the behavior witnessed is thought to be a group norm. I've witnessed it firsthand in the aftermath of an armed standoff with hostages. Minutes after the suspect surrendered himself, a television reporter with cameraman in tow came inside the building and started peppering the just-released hostages with questions, jabbing at them and I with a microphone. As news consumers, we've seen other instances of this ambush style of journalism, as other journalists have perfected it in both local and national media. And there are instances where an ambush style of journalism is indeed warranted, such as confronting con artists or corrupt CEOs. But where journalists have failed the moral test is when they lost basic human empathy, and begin treating citizens as suspects, and victims as criminals, as Aguilar does here, without apparent remorse. This was horrific, but only grossly atypical in that the lopsided assault was broadcast in its entirety, and not edited. It seems that what has happened to journalism is that far too many journalists have placed the importance of the story they would like to tell as the foremost thought in their minds, and made both facts and people subservient to that agenda. They've traded their empathy for an angle, and honest journalism for advocacy.
I was struck by reporter Rebecca Aguilar's body-language, literally standing over him in judgment with tailored suit and umbrella. The way she looked down, literally and figuratively, on an old man who had defended his life, entirely legally, and reduced him to tears seems to me to be representative of the worst stereotypes of Old Media.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:12 AM
Comments
Posted by: 1sttofight at October 18, 2007 10:56 AM (09fn4)
A 70 year old is forced to defend his home and his livelihood by killing somebody twice in three weeks. Do we send a reporter to go after a city council who ignores the crime problem? No, of course not, it's gun owner that's to blame here!
I'd like to think this is an infrequent occurrence, but my experience with local news here tells me it's a nationwide problem.
Posted by: ExUrbanKevin at October 18, 2007 10:59 AM (H3hpv)
Let me make a wild guess. The two dead perps were Hispanic.
While one of the dead criminals was Hispanic, I think you're jumping the gun stating that this journalistic assualt may be racially motivated.
As for sending a reporter to talk to Mr. Walton, I'd say that is expected, because the circumstances were indeed newsworthy. It is extraordinary that he was targeted for more than 40 break-ins, it is newsworthy that he was forced to shoot criminals twice, and extraordinary that those shooting happened in such a compressed period of time.
My argument is with how the interview was conducted.
Aquilar would have likely gotten a much better interview if she had thought to bring along a human soul (perhaps she could have borrowed one) so that she could have at least faked empathy for what Mr. Walton has gone through. He would likely have been far more receptive to a reporter that was able to display at least a passing concern for what he has gone through.
Instead, Aquilar tries to make Mr. Walton into a thug, but in so doing, reveals that she is the monster. She's getting hte attention--and the kind of attention--she deserves.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at October 18, 2007 11:15 AM (WwtVa)
Posted by: Skip at October 18, 2007 12:04 PM (KSXNV)
I'm willing to bet Ms. Aquilar wouldn't be as in your face with an Hispanic shooter in the same situation. Her sympathies, I'm sure, lie not with the shooter but with the shooting victims[criminals]. Otherwise her abrasive, in your face, passion wouldn't have distorted her judgment, in my opinion.
Didn't she win an award as the Hispanic community's best journalist or something?
Posted by: Andy B at October 18, 2007 12:28 PM (q1S2A)
Ask any good trial lawyer - different witnesses are to be questioned differently.
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 18, 2007 01:45 PM (O9Cc8)
He's also a businessman. Why not ask for an interview at his business/residence? Because he probably would tell them to get lost and they would lose the "ambush" impact. Disgraceful.
Posted by: capitano at October 18, 2007 01:49 PM (+NO33)
Posted by: Mr Kufr at October 18, 2007 03:22 PM (TOv/+)
Posted by: dmartin at October 18, 2007 03:47 PM (NspXU)
What profession is the most despised in America?
Lawyer
Politician (or is that redundant)
News Reporter
70 Year Old Store Owner
Posted by: Mekan at October 18, 2007 04:11 PM (hm8tW)
She reads her voice overs & conducts interviews in the "whitest" accent you've ever heard...right up until she signs off. She says "Rebecca" in the same accent (like her last name is going to be Johnson or Smith), then emhasizes..AQ-EEE-LARRRR (roll those "R's" baby).
Good grief.
I'm pretty sure she was the inspiration for Family Guy's "Asian reporter, Trisha Takanawa."
Posted by: Lamontyoubigdummy at October 18, 2007 04:11 PM (ydAF3)
What she said warranted a slap in the mouth and I'm only sorry the man didn't have his woman with him to tell "AQ-EEE-LARRRR" exactly that.
Posted by: Cindi at October 18, 2007 05:03 PM (asVsU)
Posted by: Mikey NTH at October 18, 2007 01:45 PM I'm not sure there is such a thing.
Posted by: Stashiu3 at October 18, 2007 07:09 PM (pf8ao)
It is stunning how TNR has learned nothing. The DVD included commentary by the director and by Chuck Lane, who replaced Michael Kelly as editor. Most of the commentary dealt with how the movie script was pieced together from actual events and transcripts of recorded conversations. Considering how painful it must have been for Lane who confronted and fired Glass, they went to great lengths to detail the sources for everything and to describe amalgams of events and characters.
It doesn't present a very flattering picture of TNR then, and given its history and the lessons that should have been learned, even less flattering today. Interestingly, one of the checks that broke down was that Glass had a romantic relationship with a co-worker who had approval authority over his work and he built similar, non-romantic relationships with other fact checkers.
Remind you of anyone?
Posted by: capitano at October 18, 2007 08:39 PM (+NO33)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 19, 2007 08:30 AM (6Yy5p)
Posted by: fretless at October 19, 2007 11:18 AM (twzGk)
WE can voice our opposition to this kind of reporting with them.
(swiped from mypetjawa.mu.nu)
FOX4 News director Maria.Barrs@foxtv.com
FOX4 Vice President and General Manager Kathy.Saunders@foxtv.com
Main Telephone: 214.720.4444
Main e-Mail: kdfw@kdfwfox4.com
Dallas Newsroom: 214.720.3154
Dallas Newsroom Fax: 214.720-3263, 214.720.3333
Posted by: mrclark at October 19, 2007 01:01 PM (DzyqG)
Sorry Rebecca, your award notwithstanding, you're a little too morena to appear on cable.
Posted by: John S. at October 19, 2007 06:09 PM (gq1+F)
To take a cue from Instapundit, maybe it's time for bloggers to start conducting ambush interviews of journalists and their bosses.
Posted by: pst314 at October 19, 2007 07:10 PM (lCxSZ)
Posted by: DJITMOTRoad-STHH at October 19, 2007 09:55 PM (OdPXf)
We'll find out pretty quick that the 1st amendment isn't quite what we think it is ;->
Posted by: Purple Avenger at October 21, 2007 01:22 AM (6Yy5p)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0046 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0025 seconds, 29 records returned.
Page size 18 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.