What is It?
I guess got a very interesting email request from Brian at Snapped Shot, who wanted me to take a look at this AFP picture published on Yahoo News.


Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 03:43 PM
Comments
Posted by: 1sttofight at July 10, 2007 04:28 PM (4bQib)
Posted by: Stefan at July 10, 2007 04:40 PM (Xx4xo)
At least it's a rounded bullet shaped... based on the picture on the referenced SLAP site, it's not nearly "sharp" enough.
Anyone know what a 7.62 AK round looks like?
Posted by: SGT Jeff (USAR) at July 10, 2007 05:03 PM (yiMNP)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at July 10, 2007 05:08 PM (HcgFD)
Posted by: SGT Jeff (USAR) at July 10, 2007 05:17 PM (yiMNP)
Posted by: Foxfier at July 10, 2007 06:26 PM (V3JE4)
Regardless, that's no U.S. bullet.
Posted by: Russ at July 10, 2007 07:36 PM (9X0tX)
Second the lack of rifling marks on the spent round and the existance of prior mentioned "tit" which would have received some degree of blunting having even hit a feather pillow at velocities in excess of 2200 feet per second, hollow points would even show signs of mushrooming, especially in smaller caliber rounds that naturally travel at higher velocities, an example being 22-250 BTHP rounds that disintegrate upon impacting a single blade of grass when fired at the higher end of reloading recommendations.
Third, there appear to be 3 radial rings for crimping a case neck into. 3? I've only ever seen 1 as that's all that is needed to crimp a cartridge neck into regardless of the powder charge. 2 of the rings after the start of the ellipse forming the point and are useless. Surface tearing caused by a form tool will
cause a similar appearance and a mis aligned form tool can also cause the "tit" mentioned before.
Finally, the cross section appears to be about 2/3 the cross section of the index finger holding the slug taking into account the oblique view of the finger, placing it at least in the 7.62 category, what we see of the slug is greater than 2 times its diameter, half a diameter is exposed between the finger and first "crimp" groove. The fingers need something to hold on to as do the rifeings need a surface to create spin, the slug must be pushing an inch long if not longer.
The photos look like a hoax.
Posted by: R30C at July 10, 2007 09:18 PM (3+0jc)
Does anyone out there know enough to have an opinion on Soviet/Russian and Iranian ammo?
Posted by: Bleepless at July 10, 2007 09:31 PM (pC/p3)
R30C is correct, at a mini minimum the round would have marks from being forced through a rifle at a couple thousand fps. It would also would go through the bed and lodge in the wall if it were stone, go through the wall if it were plaster.
The only way this could have landed on her bed in the state it's in - is if it fell out of the soldier's ammo pouch.
Posted by: Doug Halsted at July 10, 2007 09:42 PM (dHBXx)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at July 10, 2007 09:50 PM (HcgFD)
It would be simply coincidence that it happened during any kind of US activity unless there was some Iraqi Death Blossom going on a mile or so away.
Posted by: crosspatch at July 10, 2007 11:29 PM (y2kMG)
Posted by: reliapundit at July 11, 2007 01:32 AM (Y6c1T)
Posted by: David at July 11, 2007 01:39 AM (8LpVz)
It's the chip shoved up rethuglican bloggers to keep them in touch with Karl Rove (and keep them pure for Grover Norquist.)
Posted by: anon at July 11, 2007 02:33 AM (D24vK)
I think not.
Thanks for playing.
Posted by: spartacvs at July 11, 2007 06:40 AM (rKW6M)
I think its a ball point pen with a metal casing.
Let's not forget -- AFP's faked pictures ignited the intifada. They're real pros at faking news.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 11, 2007 06:45 AM (bwMN7)
"It's weird - the more I look at it, the more I think, "arrowhead.""
That's the first two things I thought when I saw the pic. It looks like it was machined rapidly on a manual mill, rough and not something that would be shot from a bore. It doesn't look like lead (which would be too soft to "machine") but it could be almost any material. It has a lack of "sheen" like it was being used for something. I would think that "if" it had been fired from a weapon and lodged in her bed (which i doubt) there should be some deformation or some lateral scrape lines. I see neither.
I'd be real surprised if it is tungsten. It's too crude looking.
Posted by: markm at July 11, 2007 07:12 AM (hVOTO)
Posted by: markm at July 11, 2007 07:52 AM (hVOTO)
Posted by: Rafar at July 11, 2007 08:04 AM (kkgmI)
Does the possibility that a fresh unfired round was handed to her in order to take a photo to go along with the story impeach her narrative in any significant way?
I think not.
Well, nobody ever accused a Tbagg reader of being intelligent, have they?
According to the caption, she claimed it was this specific bullet that hit her bed. As there is no other evidence presented at all--not the bed, nor anything else--publishing this photo hinges on this being not only a random bullet, but the specific bullet that hit here bed.
If this is not the bullet, her story and the caption are false. Period.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at July 11, 2007 09:01 AM (HcgFD)
Passion of the Toys *Insert meme stating that you should do a websearch, since my content was blocked*
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at July 11, 2007 09:07 AM (oC8nQ)
1/ Unless it did have the jacket, it should show signs of being fired.
2/ It is the wrong color for most standard rounds, so it would have to be 50 cal or greater.
3/ How did it make it to the bed without going through at least a window?
Seems to be that this photo even without considering the source is fisher than the entire us fishing fleet after a good haul.
Posted by: sonofdy at July 11, 2007 09:22 AM (2jwEz)
Posted by: Tincan Salilor at July 11, 2007 09:28 AM (L4HGI)
As far as my reaction to the picture, it appears that the bullet was never fired. Almost the same as the bullet found on JFK's stretcher in Parkland after he was declared dead.
Posted by: David Caskey at July 11, 2007 09:42 AM (G5i3t)
No, neither do I. Most stories out of Iraq these days seem to be desperately trying to keep the viewers attention by either;
1) Tying developments to events that happen to Americans.
2) Putting up pictures of exceptionally big attacks (Car bombings, etc).
3) Putting up "human interest" fluff involving death and destruction.
Frankly the news out of Iraq is pretty dull and depressing. To get your ratings you need some connection.
"I don't know about the rest of you, but this is a fairly common occurance in the US. "
Really? Good Lord...
Posted by: Rafar at July 11, 2007 10:00 AM (kkgmI)
Posted by: crosspatch at July 11, 2007 11:32 AM (y2kMG)
Posted by: TH at July 11, 2007 11:44 AM (8DaCp)
As others have mentioned there is no visible engraving from barrel rifling as would be expected from any bore caliber round. Sabots, being sub bore caliber, do not show engraving.
It does not appear to have a jacket or any gilding metal that I recognize and does have the coloration of machined tungsten.
If it is made of tungsten this could also be a useful explanation of why it doesn't show any significant deformation.
It is difficult to tell it's size relative to her knuckle, but 7.62mm is certainly in the realm of possibilty. Given the limited number of calibers in common use there by all combatants (5.56mm, 7.62mm, 12.7mm and .50 cal) it appears bigger than the smallest and smaller than the biggest, so most likely is a 7.62mm.
As to why it came to rest near, but not through, her bed? All ballistic projectiles run out of gas eventually and bullets - especially ridgid monolithic solids - do some very intersting things, especially when they ricochet and/or tumble.
Her grandson may have found it in the street.
Ultimately, a bullet coming to rest somewhere in a combat zone, especially one that does no harm, strikes me as less than newsworthy.
Posted by: ThomasD at July 11, 2007 12:15 PM (gMIZD)
AP feels the need to fake news in a country "awash" in real news. Sounds silly, yet they do it routinely.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at July 11, 2007 12:56 PM (bwMN7)
Posted by: dmoss at July 11, 2007 02:14 PM (UiHv+)
Posted by: Tully at July 11, 2007 02:24 PM (kEQ90)
Claes Henrikson
major/Swedish armed forces.
Posted by: Claes Henrikson at July 11, 2007 03:51 PM (/PyxO)
http://www.gdhenson.com/clients/pioneer/uploaded_images/sharp41t-780735.jpg
In my opinion, it was never fired from a weapon.
Posted by: sickboy at July 11, 2007 04:28 PM (S4Q5o)
Yeah, my Dad had an 8mm Mauser and it did look almost just like that. The "armor piercing" rounds had a steel jacket that looked much like the one she is holding too.
http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/3/35/180px-8mm.jpg
I have also read that we often find many old Mausers in insurgent weapons caches.
The marks on the bullet are probably from where the vice or pliers were applied to pull the bullet out of the cartridge.
Posted by: crosspatch at July 11, 2007 08:41 PM (y2kMG)
Link to pic of 8mm Mauser round
Posted by: crosspatch at July 11, 2007 08:46 PM (y2kMG)
Does the US make (or use) any saboted steel-jacketed rounds (no rifling marks)? Who does?
Posted by: Jay Stranahan at July 13, 2007 02:43 PM (nS4XC)
Now as stated, the muhj, AQ, and the insurgents are known to use 8mm mauser. Fired from a very worn rifle, it may lack rifling and old surplus ammo is sometimes that color. Fired a long distance, it would have destabilized and started tumbling, basically becoming a bullet shaped rock tossed from afar.
I'd say, it is possible it was spent and came in through a window possibly open for coolness at night and flopped on the bed. It may even be related to the U.S. raid as an object fired AT them. The AFP and most leftist loons will blame Bush and the Military anyhow, no matter who fired it.
Posted by: JP at July 13, 2007 04:35 PM (VxiFL)
I have seen some very worn bores in old K98s (and many other rifles) and they still fired well, and more acurate than the typical muhj sniper is capable of.
Posted by: JP at July 13, 2007 04:40 PM (VxiFL)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0209 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0147 seconds, 47 records returned.
Page size 27 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.