Name That Weapon
Michael Yon has a question for his readers: What the heck is this?
As the Drudge link seems to have fried Yon's server momentarily, here's the low-resolution version he emailed me this morning as he was trying to ID it.
Photo property of Michael Yon. Swiped pending permission.
Feel free to drop your guesses of what it might be used for in the comments.
I want to start by saying that without being able to get other angles and actually take the thing apart, what follows is purely unadulterated speculation, and perhaps laughably wrong. That out of the way, I think my original, joking assessment calling this a potato gun might not be too far off. This appears to have a crudely manufactuered wood front grip and stock, and the size of the holes in both to me suggest that they might have used nuts, bolts and washers to put this thing together... we're not talking a weapon designed by experts, or a weapon designed to handle much in the way of pressure. The welded together scope mount is probably not "true," and if you tried to adjust it, it would probably pull you off target. Based on what I can see, I'd suggest the scope is mostly for show, not performance. The plunger-type trigger to me suggests a friction ignitor, once again suggesting a potato gun, as does the larger of the two tubes, which suggests a combusion chamber leading to the smaller front tube, which is the barrel. With nothing else to go on, I really think it is a tater gun, though perhaps one with serious intentions. If you've got a tube of sufficient strength to handle a decent amont of propellant without detonating, I'd guess it could be used as a crude launcher, perhaps being used to toss molotov cocktails a little further or with a little more velocity or accuracy. If it wasn't found in a cache, I'd think it was a complete joke.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 04:22 PM
Comments
A weapon of desperation?
Perhaps some of the billions going to terrorist has been stopped.
Blessings
Posted by: patty at February 12, 2007 05:35 PM (1165q)
Posted by: grego at February 12, 2007 06:01 PM (S4Q5o)
Posted by: See-Dubya at February 12, 2007 06:06 PM (tLQE2)
Shhhh.
We're shipping another ship-load next week.
Keep your silence and we'll cut you in for some of the profit.
Posted by: Stealthy Persimmon at February 12, 2007 06:19 PM (41Dd+)
Posted by: Rich at February 12, 2007 06:24 PM (EblDJ)
Posted by: Rich at February 12, 2007 06:26 PM (EblDJ)
Posted by: Rich at February 12, 2007 06:30 PM (EblDJ)
Posted by: Eric J at February 12, 2007 06:59 PM (5PRM2)
Posted by: kubob at February 12, 2007 09:11 PM (Np8df)
Posted by: bird dog at February 12, 2007 09:14 PM (86QII)
Posted by: Aaron at February 12, 2007 09:17 PM (U3yk5)
Posted by: ray robison at February 12, 2007 10:48 PM (7bFG1)
Posted by: markm at February 13, 2007 06:40 AM (hVOTO)
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at February 13, 2007 08:59 AM (oC8nQ)
Not sure why it would have a scope, though. The M-79, and the M203 (it's successor) are indirect fire weapons.
Picture of M-79 here - http://world.guns.ru/grenade/m79-2.jpg
Posted by: justsomeguy at February 13, 2007 09:32 AM (1dOG4)
Posted by: Buzzy at February 13, 2007 09:50 AM (CXz7T)
Posted by: markm at February 16, 2007 12:08 PM (hVOTO)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0092 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0058 seconds, 25 records returned.
Page size 10 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.