She's a Ho Ho Ho
Via Fox News:
None of the 45 Duke lacrosse players had their DNA liked to genetic material recovered from the dancer, though DNA of five other men was recovered at that time. It is not yet know if embattled Durham district attorney Mike Nifong will order all the men in North Carolina tested from a match.
The exotic dancer who accused three former Duke lacrosse players of raping her at a house party has given birth to a baby, FOX News has confirmed.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 11:17 AM
Comments
Posted by: Anonymous for now at December 15, 2006 11:33 AM (RMHg5)
Posted by: Scrapiron at December 15, 2006 11:52 AM (Eodj2)
Posted by: F451 at December 15, 2006 12:25 PM (KAtv4)
John Hawkins of Right Wing News. Raleigh, NC
Betsy Newmark, Betsy's Page. Raleigh, NC
Lorie Byrd, Wizbang! Clayton, NC
Josh Manchester, The Adventures of Chester, Durham, NC
"Sister Toldjah," Sister Toldjah, Charlotte, NC
Bruce ???, Gay Patriot, Charlotte, NC
Mary Katherine Ham, Townhall, native of Durham, NC
That is just to name a few.
I've got a question for you, scrapiron... ever been here?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at December 15, 2006 12:30 PM (g5Nba)
Posted by: legion at December 15, 2006 01:17 PM (3eWKF)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at December 15, 2006 01:42 PM (xXVSL)
Nifong bought Edsel stock and is trying to convince everyone on the showroom floor that it's a Ferrari.
Posted by: cfbleachers at December 15, 2006 02:22 PM (V56h2)
Posted by: Specter at December 15, 2006 06:33 PM (ybfXM)
Here is a clear case of probable prosecutorial misconduct--witholding exculpatory evidence, etc. There have also been demonstrated instances where prosecutors have witheld evidence in capital or first degree murder trials, only to have the wrongly accused/sentenced later exonerated.
The Duke students were able to hire good legal defenses. Very often, the victims of prosecutorial misconduct are not. Given the permancy of execution, and the possibility of misconduct on the part of the prosecution, the "act without recourse" (execution) should not be imposed.
Posted by: Consigliari at December 16, 2006 10:30 PM (ztr4T)
Posted by: Tom TB at December 17, 2006 09:58 AM (Eodj2)
2- Why is this an arguement AGAINST capital punishment? The DNA evidence exonerates the accused. Evidently, there ARE methods to ascertain guilt or innocence with a beyond-reasonable-doubt level (and, when taken with other evidence, 'beyond all doubt' levels can be reached) of certainty. In fact, this is an arguement FOR capital punishment- a corrupt DA who was railroading innocent defendants has been caught out, and the accused will be released.
Posted by: DaveP. at December 17, 2006 01:02 PM (jo3x6)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0079 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0055 seconds, 19 records returned.
Page size 8 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.