Coroner in Lloyd Inquest Fails to Prove His Charge
I'd like to know how this British Assistant Deputy coroner can justify this conclusion:
It is tragic when any civilian is killed in combat, but the simple fact that the bullet that killed Mr. Lloyd was fired by an American unit does not establish that:
A coroner ruled on Friday that a British journalist who died in Iraq at the start of the war was unlawfully killed by American forces. Lloyd, a correspondent with the British TV network ITN , was killed outside Basra in southern Iraq in March 2003. Oxfordshire Assistant Deputy Coroner Andrew Walker said he'll be writing the director of public prosecutions to seek to bring the perpetrators to justice. "Terry Lloyd died following a gunshot wound to the head. The evidence this bullet was fired by the Americans is overwhelming," Walker said. Lebanese interpreter Hussein Osman also was killed in the ITN crew, and cameraman Fred Nerac remains missing. ITN cameraman Daniel Demoustier survived. Lloyd -- who was aged 50 -- was shot in the back during U.S. and Iraqi crossfire and was apparently shot by U.S. forces when he was taken away in a minibus for treatment. "There is no doubt that the minibus presented no threat to the American forces. There is no doubt it was an unlawful act of fire upon the minibus," Walker said.
- that the vehicle was intentionally fired upon;
- that the vehicle could be considered "no threat" if it was targeted.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 10:36 AM
Comments
1
Unbelievable.
Posted by: Anonymous for now at October 13, 2006 01:14 PM (RMHg5)
2
Ironic.
Posted by: monkyboy at October 13, 2006 01:21 PM (unUeA)
3
It's not a conviction or anything, the coroner's opinion is just that. It's up to the prosecutors to examine his conclusions before deciding whether or not to bring it to trial.
I agree that there is not enough here yet to support a charge of murder, but I am troubled that apparently the DoD is holding some evidence back. Film of the incident has been edited, including the crucial moment when he received the fatal bullet. And witnesses supplied statements but were not subject to questioning or cross examination.
If the authorities think there is enough to proceed, maybe there is enough as yet unreleased evidence to support the charge that will come out in a full trial.
I agree that there is not enough here yet to support a charge of murder, but I am troubled that apparently the DoD is holding some evidence back. Film of the incident has been edited, including the crucial moment when he received the fatal bullet. And witnesses supplied statements but were not subject to questioning or cross examination.
If the authorities think there is enough to proceed, maybe there is enough as yet unreleased evidence to support the charge that will come out in a full trial.
Posted by: aplomb at October 13, 2006 01:39 PM (Iva5Y)
4
A reporter who has an ego so large he would put himself on a battle field and then in a cross fire for a story is sure to die of stupidity. Feel sorry for his family, but be amazed that an educated person could be so stupid. War is hell and people die.
Posted by: Scrapiron at October 13, 2006 08:55 PM (fEnUg)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0068 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0051 seconds, 12 records returned.
Page size 7 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.