Lefties: We Did Get Fooled Again
This has all the making of a spectacular implosion:
It will be very interesting to see what "evidence" RFK, Jr. will present. Despite the claims made above, I suspect the content of the article will provide bold headline-inducing accusations, weave nebulous connections and schemes, and in the end, fail to provide any sort of evidence that can be considered solid, or bring forth witnesses that won't almost immediately be found to have credibility problems. Even the flimsiest of evidence will be enough for the more excitable types on the far left, but barring something truly explosive and concrete (which is something that has been sorely lacking in every Democratic “bombshell” of the past six years), I imagine this will be grist for the Democratic Underground types for months to come, and largely forgotten within the next week by everyone else.
A damning and detailed feature article, written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for Rolling Stone and documenting evidence of the theft of the 2004 Presidential Election is set to hit newstands this Friday, The BRAD BLOG can now confirm. The online version of the article will be posted tomorrow (Thursday) morning. The article -- headlined on the cover as "Did Bush Steal the 2004 Election?: How 350,000 Votes Disappeared in Ohio" -- has been several months in development and will contend that a concerted effort was undertaken by high-level Republican officials to steal the Election in Ohio -- and thus the country -- in 2004! Kennedy told The BRAD BLOG this morning that "the best evidence says the Republicans succeeded" in their plan. He writes in the 10-page long article, and confirmed to us today, that evidence shows Ohio Sec. of State J. Kenneth Blackwell was "certainly in on" the scheme, and there are indications that the effort went all the way up to the White House. Kennedy, who is co-host of Ring of Fire, a weekend show on Air America Radio, is an environmental attorney and the son of the late Robert F. Kennedy. This is his first public foray into the realm of Election Fraud, Election Integrity, Electronic Voting and, in particular, the questionable results of Election 2004.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 09:36 PM
Comments
Posted by: Chad Evans at May 31, 2006 10:13 PM (vKISv)
My experience is that Republicans are pretty ham-handed at breaking the law. The Dems are the ones who are good at it.
Posted by: AST at May 31, 2006 10:50 PM (cIrqr)
But of course, the Democrats are just electoral innocents - babes in the woods. They would never, ever, ever think of cheating in an election, now would they?
Posted by: Rick Moran at June 01, 2006 03:32 AM (Ffvoi)
all "won" by kerry, but all had more fraud and closer margins than ohio or fla in 2004.
rfkjr is a fool/
his uncle stole the 1960 election
Posted by: reliapundit at June 01, 2006 05:36 AM (9lJDT)
Posted by: juandos at June 01, 2006 06:26 AM (mks1H)
Posted by: Actual at June 01, 2006 07:45 AM (HgxP0)
Posted by: Fred at June 01, 2006 07:49 AM (xX+1y)
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at June 01, 2006 08:57 AM (g5Nba)
Posted by: David Caskey at June 01, 2006 08:58 AM (6wTpy)
The bad registrations were largely generated by ACORN and ACT, which are Democrat proxies.
Posted by: Robert Crawford at June 01, 2006 08:59 AM (1j9aH)
OMG...you mean Detroit's NOT supposed send employees to absentee voters homes, have the employees fill out the ballot, then have the absentee sign it? Who'da thought it?
Kennedy's uncle managed a fair amount of dead votes et al in Cook County Illinois in 1960 if I recall. Don't suppose RFK,Jr is too interested in that, however.
My bet is RFK, Jr is also in favor of populate vote election of the President....that way they only have to steal big coastal cities and can leave pesky Ohio alone :-D
Posted by: Aridog at June 01, 2006 10:11 AM (Qpl4l)
Posted by: Phil Byler at June 01, 2006 10:36 AM (5rVtL)
Posted by: Fred at June 01, 2006 10:38 AM (xX+1y)
Posted by: Rob at June 01, 2006 02:52 PM (BFtAQ)
Ilegal campaign funding is a far, far cry from throwing an election. Brad blog was just throwing whatever it could find--relevant or not--against the wall in hopes something would stick.
Posted by: iconoclast at June 01, 2006 04:38 PM (yR5Xg)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0113 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0083 seconds, 23 records returned.
Page size 12 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.