Color Me Badly

Considering their past track record of funding "the other side" in Fallujah, protesting against wounded American soldiers (with signs that read "Maimed for a Lie" and "Enlist Here to Die for Halliburton"), and cuddling up with neo-copperhead John Murtha, I suppose it should be hardly surprising that the left wing radicals of Code Pink would appropriate and badly PhotoShop a photo of Iranian women fighting for freedom for their anti-freedom message.

Pathetic.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 03:43 PM

Comments

1 After this post and the last one, you are certified. Back away from the Kool-Aid Bong. Sad.

Posted by: Fred at January 20, 2006 04:31 PM (xX+1y)

2 Aw, wassa matter, Freddie? A little too much accuracy for your tender sensibilities? Please, feel free to argue what facts you can command to defend Code Pink.

I'm all ears.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 20, 2006 04:43 PM (g5Nba)

3 Fred-

File this under swiftboating.

Cyerbercast News Service. Brent Bozells bargain basement operation.

What a joke.

Smearing Murtha based on two interviews with defeated opponents of the congressman from years ago who claim to have heard Murtha say he didn't deserve his medals etc.

Right.

Posted by: ArthurStone at January 20, 2006 05:05 PM (DEot0)

4 Arthur, I tire of your empty rhetoric, inability to support your contentions, and your desire to slur others when your arguments don't hold up.

There has not been any slurring of Murtha's service record on the blog, period. Ony his congressional record.

Get is straight, or get gone.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 20, 2006 05:45 PM (0fZB6)

5 Upon further review, I had only scanned the Townhall link for the Code Pink information and did not catch the short paragraph about the Cybercast News Service story, and would have used another link if I had.

I DO NOT support any efforts to tar Murtha's service record.

I found it reprehensible, and you will note I have not posted on the subject as found it distasteful. The "he said, he said," allegations of a couple of old Democrats don't amount to much in my book, and his Congressional record, especially recently, is more than enough reason to condemn him.

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at January 20, 2006 06:04 PM (0fZB6)

6 What do you expect from a bunch of Stalino-Fascist whores? Code Pink and lies are one and the same thing.

Posted by: Mescalero at January 21, 2006 12:11 AM (tQK7u)

7 Artie,

Murtha's record aside - just the fact that he associates himself with a group like Code Pink - says a lot about his character and his leanings. I mean Code Pink published a fake picture (sounds kinda like the NYT, huh?) as real, has donated funds to the Fallujah "Freedom Fighters", and gave Murtha the pink badge of courage. Get a grip...

Posted by: Specter at January 21, 2006 01:53 PM (ybfXM)

8 Specter-

Once Mr. Bush stops dealing with Pat Robertson I'll get concerned with a Democrat dealing with the opposite fringe.

Posted by: ArthurStone at January 21, 2006 03:09 PM (DEot0)

9 Bush dealing with Robertson? When was that, Artie? I do believe that the White House openly condemned Robertson at least twice recently: 1. Hugo Chavez and 2. Ariel Sharon.

Are you living in a vacuum somewhere, Artie?

And you had also not heard of Code Pink?

Posted by: Retired Spy at January 21, 2006 03:25 PM (BRgB4)

10 RS-

You seem to forget Mr. Robertson's dicey 'charity' 'Operation Blessing' received millions of FEMA dollars post-Katrina. One of two 'faith-based' orgs to receive federal dollars.

Easy to overlook.

Posted by: ArthurStone at January 21, 2006 04:54 PM (DEot0)

11 Arthur, why in the world did you bring up Pat Robertson? He has said some pretty lunkheaded things, but to the best of my recollection, he pretty usually comes back with an apology when called on his comments. Perhaps it is the apology thing that throws you for a loop; since libs don't do that sort of thing. Do you think faith-based organizations are incapable of rendering assistance to areas ravaged by nature? My church has partnered with a church in the costal MS area that was totally destroyed. The partnership includes sending food, clothes, money and building teams to the area to help not just the partner church, but the local community as well. It certainly would have been nice to have federal funds to multiply the assistance we provide, but we're doing fine anyway.

Perhaps you personally are not anti-faith, but that sure seems to be the dominant position of most liberals. I have no idea why Christianity is so threatening to liberals other than our morals are anchored in God not human feelings.

People that associate with Code Pink flirt with an organization that is anti-democracy and pro-communisn. Is that an associateion that a US Representative should make? There is a significant difference between believing in God and Jesus Christ (Christianity) and communism. Perhaps you should do some reading and soul searching.

Posted by: Old Soldier at January 21, 2006 06:10 PM (owAN1)

12 It appears that you have been focused on negativity printed in The Nation magazine- and not on the good that was done by Operation Blessing.

Operation Blessing was an approved religious charity for Katrina relief. It was a FEMA-approved charity - NOT a Bush approved charity.

Seems as though some sour grapes developed when Operation Blessing was approved and Richard Walden's Operation USA was not.

Is it a coincidence that The Nation is a Far Left publication? Don;t think so, Pookie.

Posted by: Retired Spy at January 21, 2006 06:17 PM (BRgB4)

13 How can you even attempt make that comparison Stone? (And I used that purposely because it's starting to be obvious you are smoking some strong stuff).

How does Pat Robertson, who everyone, including the right, denounced for his recent statements, even begin to look like a noted politician actually accepting awards and hugging leaders of a treasonous organization like Code Pink?You are really reaching here....

Oh...and I think you had better start denouncing Nagin then...seeing as he believes that it was God that attacked New Orleans for being mad at America. Another dumb statement properly called.

Posted by: Specter at January 21, 2006 07:43 PM (ybfXM)

14 RS-

FEMA = Brownie = Bush crony.

Oh and let's talk about Pat's involvment in the diamond trade in Zaire.

What a christian man is he.

Enjoy your weekend folks.

Posted by: ArthurStone at January 22, 2006 10:32 AM (hGNke)

15 And your comrade in lunacy, Fat Bastard, thinks "I" need logic lessons?

You can't connect the dots in a simple syllogism.

What does investment in diamond mines in Africa have to do with anything?

The so-called FEMA dollars 'given' to Pat Robertson's organization were paid AFTER Robertson's group had shelled out millions for Katrina aid.

That is how faith-based initiatives can keep afloat.





Posted by: Retired Spy at January 22, 2006 11:42 AM (BRgB4)

16 Arthur, sadly, I have come to the same conclusion you already had before making any comments at CY's blog - that you see things only one way. Any more comments to you will only equal a waste of my time. So I in the future, I shall spend my time more productively. Here's hoping you will one day see the light.

Posted by: Old Soldier at January 22, 2006 05:14 PM (owAN1)






Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0082 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0049 seconds, 24 records returned.
Page size 12 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.