Confederate Yankee
September 24, 2009
Census Worker Found Hanged in KY
The state, not the lube.
The
AP report states that Bill Sparkman, a 51-year-old part-time Census field worker, was found hanged from a tree with the word "fed" written on his chest in a remote corner of Daniel Boone National Forest.
Predictably, the
usual suspects are
suggesting that Rush Limbaugh threw the rope over the branch and Glenn Beck tied the knot.
The only problems with that theory is:
- lack of evidence
- lack of evidence, and
- lack of evidence
And while liberals are quick to blame the vast right wing conspiracy for Mr. Sparkman's death, they had to overlook this part of the story to do so:
Appalachia scholar Roy Silver, a New York City native now living in Harlan County, Ky., said he doesn't sense an outpouring of anti-government sentiment in the region as has been exhibited in town hall meetings in other parts of the country.
"I don't think distrust of government is any more or less here than anywhere else in the country," said Silver, a sociology professor at Southeast Community College.
Hopefully the investigation into Mr. Sparkman's death will lead to the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of the person or persons responsible for his death. And I rather suspect that when they do find a motive, it will have very little to do with politics and quite a bit to do with him stumbling across marijuana farming, meth labs, or moonshining.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:54 AM
| Comments (36)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
"The state, not the lube" lol
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 01:10 AM (bhNGz)
2
americablog specifcally says it is too early to link this to a political motive yet you say the usual suspects are blaming Limbaugh and Beck and link there. You might want to fix that. I'll go ahead and hold my breath.
Posted by: John at September 24, 2009 06:08 AM (RPIBb)
3
I'd suspect a moonshining rig in that area.
Posted by: Lord Nazh at September 24, 2009 07:18 AM (sBNzZ)
4
"americablog specifcally says it is too early to link this to a political motive"
You're as dishonest as americablog. What they say is -
"It's too early in the investigation to link this to the Republican demonization of the Census in particular (ACORN) and the US government in general (suggesting that the Obama administration was full of communists bent on destroying our country)."
In other words they say it's too early to link it to a political motive at the exact same time as they link it to a political motive.
But I'm touched that the left suddenly thinks that demonizing the government is a bad thing, now that BusHitler and his reichwinger SS no longer run it.
Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2009 08:24 AM (PN3VA)
5
Typically pot farmers and meth cookers don't murder federal employees and display their bodies in a provocative manner that essentially guarantees a thorough investigation. As a rule, they really like to keep a lower profile than that. This is the type of crime that usually turns out be politically motivated. If so, people pushing insane theories about the census or the federal government in general will indeed bear some moral, if not legal, responsibility for this murder.
Please note the various qualifiers.
Posted by: MS at September 24, 2009 08:38 AM (5SZ5z)
6
>>"people pushing insane theories about the census or the federal government in general will indeed bear some moral, if not legal, responsibility for this murder."
When you accept moral responsibility for the murder of JFK, get back to me on this. Until that time, can it.
Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2009 08:46 AM (PN3VA)
7
One has to remember the folks in eastern Ky dont like people askin questions and when the questions are from a Fed worker it will make matters worse. With all the coal miners, and coal haulers out of work in eastern Ky I dont think I would go around saying "Hi, I'm from the Federal Government and I would like to ask you a few questions"....Paw get your shotgun would be the next thing the Fed worker would hear.
Posted by: Joe at September 24, 2009 09:21 AM (3u/pA)
8
Better stay away from Copperhead Road.
Posted by: Tully at September 24, 2009 09:31 AM (tUyDE)
9
Could Steve possibly explain his total non-sequitur to me? I have no idea what point he's trying to make. While I was alive (although in elementary school) when JFK was killed, I wasn't going around spouting nonsensical theories about the White House being secretly run by the Vatican, or controlled by the Kremlin, so I don't think I bear any responsibility, moral or legal, for his death.
And for the record, yes, I think Bill O'Reilly bears some moral, although probably not legal, responsibility for the murder of Dr. Tiller.
Posted by: MS at September 24, 2009 09:40 AM (5SZ5z)
10
Bill O'Reilly? How so?
Posted by: Calumet7 at September 24, 2009 11:07 AM (arVyR)
11
Calumet7-
they claim that because O'Reilly pointed out that Tiller killed kids older than my niephew was at birth, he's responsible for Tiller being killed in some fashion.
Because, y'know, pointing out facts is horrifically biased.
This crime sounds to me like someone trying to disguise a murder, and doing a piss-poor job of it.
Posted by: Foxfier at September 24, 2009 12:36 PM (OtIqW)
12
Yeah, what sort of crazy idjit would think that a census-worker being murdered right when the 9/12 protests were happening, with the word "FED" on his chest, & right after nice people like Glenn Beck told millions of Americans that he & people like him were the enemy - to be resisted at any cost, by any means necessary - has anything whatsoever to do with those same nice people repeatedly comparing census-workers to the Gestapo &/or Stalinist Commissars? The NERVE!
It's good to know that the finest minds at FreeRepublic have already blown the whistle on the obvious perps ... ACORN! This false-flag lynching will surely not go unpunished for long: I'm sure that his volunteer school-aid work made Sparkman many enemies in this nefarious crypto-socialist cabal, & they had to silence him before he revealed the truth about their mandatory blood-oath to serve Lucifer (& Kylie Minogue).
Congratulations on taking the responsible route & not jumping to unwarranted conclusions over what is plainly a politically sensational crime-story (*cough cough* Ashley Todd *cough*).
Posted by: jim at September 24, 2009 02:24 PM (2TjV9)
13
>>"what sort of crazy idjit would think that a census-worker being murdered right when the 9/12 protests were happening ..."
A crazy idjit like you, as he was NOT murdered on 9/12. Facts and liberals don't mix.
Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2009 03:05 PM (QnU4y)
14
>>"Could Steve possibly explain his total non-sequitur to me?"
It's no non-sequiter. It's your own stupid thought procesess reflected back at you. You're a man of the left. So was JFK's killer. Hence you bear some "moral responsibility" for what the left does, including kill JFK.
If that sort of thinkng bothers you in others, then stop engaging in it yourself.
Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2009 03:09 PM (QnU4y)
15
Typically pot farmers and meth cookers don't murder federal employees and display their bodies in a provocative manner that essentially guarantees a thorough investigation.
Really?
Just how well versed are you in the 'typical' murder of informants/federales by the Appalachian narco mountain boyz?
Because I work all through eastern KY and travel that area every month (Harlan up through to Hazard.) I'm willing to bet that they don't play by anybodies rules.
That CSM article quotes a guy talking about 'roads that have never been paved' and he's not kidding.
Posted by: ThomasD at September 24, 2009 03:54 PM (21H5U)
16
That CSM article quotes a guy talking about 'roads that have never been paved' and he's not kidding.
I grew up (partly) in such an area. Some "warning" killings happened around Modoc county, when folks got too nosy in...uh...unofficial import areas. All the locals know that if you come over a hill and there's a camper and evidence of folks being there, but they're not showing themselves, you get your cows and get the heck out without even looking like you were looking.
Posted by: Foxfier at September 24, 2009 07:36 PM (OtIqW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 23, 2009
ACORN Commits Suicide
They've decided to sue James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles in Maryland.
How will they do that and avoid making their records available through
discovery?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
05:49 PM
| Comments (63)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I am not a lawyer, and I have not seen the filings, but I am going to guess that the filings are very carefully worded to mention only the fact of the allegedly illegal voice recordings, with no mention of why the recordings were made, just that they were.
I think that will limit discovery to pretty much safe territory.
As usual, public safeguards will work against us.
Posted by: Larry Sheldon at September 23, 2009 06:34 PM (OmeRL)
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at September 23, 2009 06:36 PM (MxQFN)
3
>>"The liberal activist group contends that the audio portion of the video was obtained illegally because Maryland requires two-party consent to create sound recordings."
Maryland does not require two-party consent for sound recordings.
Posted by: Steve at September 23, 2009 06:48 PM (O/V6T)
4
What the hell is ACORN?
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 23, 2009 06:59 PM (OX5qU)
5
ACORN is an organization that helps poor people and for that reason it's been targeted by Republican operatives. Don't you listen to NPR? You would know these things.
Posted by: zhombre at September 23, 2009 07:32 PM (zzL++)
6
Steve,
These folks (ACORN)need to be put out of business, but I'm afraid you are mistaken about the Maryland law...
Under Maryland’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, it is unlawful to tape record a conversation without the permission of all the parties. See Bodoy v. North Arundel Hosp., 945 F.Supp. 890 (D. Md. 1996). Additionally, recording with criminal or tortuous purpose is illegal, regardless of consent. Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402.
Disclosing the contents of intercepted communications with reason to know they were obtained unlawfully is a crime as well.
Violations of the law are felonies punishable by imprisonment for not more than five years and a fine of not more than $10,000. Civil liability for violations can include the greater of actual damages, $100 a day for each day of violation or $1,000, along with punitive damages, attorney fees and litigation costs. To recover civil damages, however, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant knew it was illegal to tape the communication without consent from all participants. MD. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-410.
This is from http://www.rcfp.org/taping/states/maryland.html The Reporters committee for freedom of the press.
All that being said, if what they did is indeed illegal, how is it that the tv stations get away with 'ambush interviews'?
PeterT
Posted by: PeterT at September 23, 2009 08:29 PM (4I9p+)
7
PeterT,
All that is well and good, but you're talking about criminal law, and APORN is bringing a civil case.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at September 23, 2009 08:43 PM (WjpSC)
8
Actually it's a civil case based on criminal complaints. The AG refused to pursue it and decided the best avenue would be to file criminal complaints for further litigation. There could actually be prison sentences involved with it. Unfortunately these videos prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Giles and O'Keefe broke the law. Little bit of irony if you like that sort of thing, ha.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 23, 2009 08:54 PM (OX5qU)
9
RICORN:
Racketeering-Influenced Corrupt Organization for Radical Non-Whites.
Posted by: Zeek at September 23, 2009 09:31 PM (HQn1a)
10
Everyone keep an eye out for a link for a defense fund.
I plan on giving as much as I can to them.
After Acorn loses, I hope they counter sue the bastards.
Papa Ray
Central Texas
Posted by: Papa Ray at September 23, 2009 09:46 PM (JpVJn)
11
Maryland does not require two-party consent for sound recordings.
Note that for a civil suit to prevail the plaintiff must be able to prove that the defendants knew the taping was illegal.
Good luck with that.
how is it that the tv stations get away with 'ambush interviews'?
They do them in public, where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
Posted by: Tully at September 23, 2009 10:18 PM (tUyDE)
12
zhombre, ACORN is a corporation that has received multiple millions of dollars in tax payer funding and they intimidate banks into giving loans to people who can't afford them, register democrats and other phony Americans, and give advice on skirting U.S. laws and basic decency. Thus Obama made sure they were a partner in the U.S. Census based on their total respectability and attention to accuracy because as we all know the census is extremely important. That was after he spoke to their group and assured them that he would enthusiastically request their help in shaping the agenda for his administration - youtube it - it'll give you a tingle up your leg just like Chris Matthews.
Posted by: Jayne at September 23, 2009 10:19 PM (dwIL0)
13
Thanks, Jayne, but I knew that. The irony lamp was lit when I posted that. But I have liberal friends who get all their news from NPR and, nice people that they are, about many issues they are clueless.
Posted by: zhombre at September 23, 2009 10:35 PM (zzL++)
14
From Roxanne, 1987 movie with Steve Martin:
[Roxanne Kowalski is walking behind a hedge because she is nude]
Roxanne Kowalski: Nobody had a coat?
C.D. Bales: I thought you said you didn't want a coat...
Roxanne Kowalski: Why would I not want a coat?
C.D. Bales: You said you didn't want a coat!
Roxanne Kowalski: I was being ironic.
C.D. Bales: Oh, ho, ho, irony! Oh, no, no, we don't get that here. See, uh, people ski topless here while smoking dope, so irony's not really a, a high priority. We haven't had any irony here since about, uh, '83, when I was the only practitioner of it. And I stopped because I was tired of being stared at.
Posted by: zhombre at September 23, 2009 10:37 PM (zzL++)
15
I don't know exactly where to search, but I have heard that there is a journalist shield law that protects investigative journalists from the electronic surveillance law.
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 12:09 AM (P4tl8)
16
Looks like the case will turn on whether or not the Acorn slimes had "a reasonable expecation of privacy". Something I would reasonably expect they did NOT have. Of course, it depends how many lefty kooks they pack the jury with.
The real solution is to conduct retaliatory lawfare. Such as finding someone with standing to file personal lawsuits against the crooks who run Acorn....
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 12:19 AM (P4tl8)
17
"Note that for a civil suit to prevail the plaintiff must be able to prove that the defendants knew the taping was illegal. " -- Actually, that's the responsibility of the tapers and not the taped. These wannabe journalists should have familiarized themselves with the law prior to undertaking their operation. By not doing so, they are guilty by negligence.
Discovery goes both ways. Now Giles and O'Keefe will have to turn over ALL the raw, unedited tapes from ALL the ACORN offices they visited. Giles and O'Keefe are now going to have to show WHY they undertook this operation in concocting an elaborate scheme involving underage sex traffic and prostitution. Are there previous statements and/or witnesses to this specific kind of illegal behavior on behalf of ACORN and if not, why would they concoct such an elaborate scheme if not for the sole purpose of embarrassment and harassment.
Remember also that these ACORN representatives broke no laws. The underage sex traffic and prostitution idea/scheme was created by Giles and O'Keefe and not ACORN. These reps can easily say they knew it was all a hoax and played along with it and the burden to prove differently is on Giles and O'Keefe which will be impossible for them to do. This is why Giles and O'Keefe should have filled out the paperwork and allowed these reps to process the paperwork knowing their criminal intent. That way ACORN would be implicated in criminal conspiracy activity. Real journalists would have known to do that. That way, this lawsuit and any future lawsuits (and you can bet there will be more) wouldn't have any merit due to the organization's self-incriminating behavior.
Giles, O'Keefe and Breitbart are going to have to prove they did what they did for the social good as journalists or to target, harass and cause irreparable harm to the organization's reputation for political interests. Discovery of ALL the raw, unedited tapes from ALL the offices they visited will definitely shed light on this issue. Keep in mind, they've already been caught in several lies concerning their "operation" and depending on the outcome of this litigation, will undoubtedly be facing more litigation in each state they visited. They should have filled out the paperwork.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 12:40 AM (bhNGz)
18
Tully,
You write:
>They do them in public, where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
Would one have such a reasonable expectation in a corporate workplace? This is normally represented in an employee manual, although the Acorn manuals I've found so far are exceptionally poor substitutes for such a document. As a information technology and security risk expert for a Fortune 500 financial firm, I'm well aware that we not only monitor employee instant messaging, emails, web usage and other activities, but specify in our policy that there should be no reasonable expectation of privacy in the workplace. This policy specification also provides for our video monitoring of workplace environments (particularly necessary when you handle checks and credit cards) and for the other controls that may result in the digital recording of employee behavior within the workplace.
Would one expect an employee at ACORN to be subject to such monitoring? In the event the employee ever encounters PII (personally identifiable information), especially financial information (credit card, debit card, checking account), the industry practice answer is a certain yes. Controls recommended in PCI (Payment Card Industry), for instance, would provide for such monitoring. Do we have the express written consent of an employee prior to their being recorded on a camera in Maryland or any other state? Of course not; they've received training that they are subject to the various privacy programs and controls the company may deem necessary to protect the confidentiality of our customer's data.
Given that Acorn was dealing with PII (social security numbers, names, addresses, etc.), there should be no reasonable expectation of privacy given the expectation that Acorn would institute monitoring controls. Should Acorn have failed to document such expectations, the industry practice still should prevail and if anything, this is further indication that Acorn has failed in the application of appropriate controls over PII and financial data (something I would expect to encounter given the data I've seen so far).
Conclusion: These employees had no such expectation of privacy in a workplace handling PII/financial data.
Posted by: HatlessHessian at September 24, 2009 12:40 AM (7r7wy)
19
"a reasonable expectation* of privacy" -- is already established in Maryland's law.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 12:42 AM (bhNGz)
20
You're wrong hatless -- the reasonable practice would be conducted by the company itself in which the employees would be aware and by taking jobs with the organization, would have consented to being monitored and recorded. Usually this type of monitoring involves video only and that in many states, it's a felony to audio record somebody without their consent. This does not apply to a pimp and a prostitute who are not doing what they did for PII. If Giles and O'Keefe were to embark on this operation for the purpose of PII, then they would need the organization's permission and/or a regulatory agency's permission and STILL, the reps at ACORN would need to be notified as per Maryland's law. And most certainly, audio recording would have been forbidden.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 12:48 AM (bhNGz)
21
That is for a court to decide, not a lefty with situational ethics.
As for the discovery phase, I highly doubt that the discovery will be able to extend to tapes made outside of that particular office. Which is a pity because it will show even more Acorn corruption
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 12:49 AM (P4tl8)
22
It's not situational ethics, it's the law and us lefties knew it all along. 8>)
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 12:53 AM (bhNGz)
23
>>"Under Maryland’s Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, it is unlawful to tape record a conversation without the permission of all the parties."
The law does not say any such thing. Go ahead and cite the relevant language from the Act if you can.
Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2009 07:17 AM (PN3VA)
24
Why is that disgusting pedophile Timmy Evans being allowed to post here?
Posted by: Steve at September 24, 2009 07:19 AM (PN3VA)
25
Because ACORN and their fine educated state-of-the-art Jewish lawyers got me out of it and a huge cash settlement while bankrupting the defendants 50 times over in making them defend themselves. You know how it works, all the best Conservatives always have the best Liberal lawyers.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 08:50 AM (OX5qU)
26
One can gauge Lipiwitz's knowledge of the law by the fact L seems to think that we have private prosecutions leading to jail sentences in the US, when this is a purely civil suit. The actual filing can be found HERE.
Maryland law does indeed require proof that the tapers knew they were violating the relevant two-party-consent law in order for the plaintiffs to recover civil damages. (See claim #13 in the suit, which claims "knowing AND had reason to know." "Reason to know" is not enough to collect damages, the plaintiff must prove positive knowledge. Difficult.)
This is further complicated by Maryland's shield law for press. Note that all three plaintiffs are claiming damages for "loss of reputation," a claim that is a naked attempt to end-run the absolute-truth defense for defamation by trying to recast a defamation claim as something else, something which has failed to fly in court on the 4th Circuit before. See the Food Lion case, wherein the court dismissed such attempts and noted that the damage to reputation was caused not by the publication of plaintiff's embarrassing actions, but by the actions themselves.
Also note that once you remove the "reputation" claims the only remaining damage claims are those of the two employees for loss of employment and emotion distress, damages caused at least in part by their co-plaintiff, ACORN. The defendants didn't fire anyone, and ACORN itself will find a judge rather non-sympathetic to their being a party to claims for damages they themselves caused. It would be LOL irony if Breitbart et al dragged ACORN in as a third-party defendant....
Yes, Maryland has an anti-SLAPP statute tied directly to the First Amendment. That could also come into play, as ACORN has a history of SLAPP suits against anyone who stings them with truths. Discovery could be really really fun, as the defendants can explore just about everything related to ACORN's hiring, training, and operational practices.
No call on the "expectation of privacy" issue. Not enough information yet available, but generally employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the workplace, as employers generally have an inherent right to supervise employee conduct, especially when the personal financial information of others is involved.
Posted by: Tully at September 24, 2009 10:00 AM (tUyDE)
27
no lipi, it is merely your facile interpretation of the law.
The Acorn representatives had no reasonable expectation of privacy when in an office conducting business. Leon Wolfe has a nice discussion of some of the applicable law on redstate.
So the privacy consideration is reasonably out, which eliminates use of the wiretapping law if the "reasonable expectation" were not enough. Truth is always the best defense against defamation. And the Acorn has as much admitted that the firing was unjustified--putting it at risk for an employee lawsuit for unjustified firing. Nice
And this assures that Obama's Acorn will remain in the news for a while longer. Though possibly going around some more and blathering like a lefty kook about eliminating nuclear weapons, blaming the USA for the world's problems, and pontificating about the biggest non-problem in the world Global Warming will distract attention from Obama's Acorn.
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 04:27 PM (FGCRY)
28
The trailer park "Woodward and Bernstein" will also be facing multiple suits in California and Pennsylvania as well. Maybe they can go back to Joe Thiel and get another $30,000 "grant" to pay for 10 minutes of their attorney's billable time to defend themselves from the first $30,000 "grant".
And how many more times if Breitbart going to claim how much he supports Giles and O'Keefe who PRODUCED, EDITED and SUBMITTED THESE VIDEOS?!?!? We get it Breitbart...you're blaming it on the kids. We get it!!!
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 24, 2009 05:29 PM (OX5qU)
29
I find it ironic that Lipiwitz, who on other strings at this site has recited ad nauseum that he has no interest in this matter, is the one defending ACORN and their former employees.
Posted by: Michel Smith at September 24, 2009 05:37 PM (T4ASz)
30
we get it lipi--Acorn and its affiliates like SEIU plan on conducting lawfare to discourage any further investigations.
However, since the truth is the best defense against defamation lawsuits I would guess that the CA suit has little chance of going anywhere. Philly? well, how exactly will anyone sue for damages in Philly? I thought the Acorn enablers refused to help O'Keefe and Giles? Maybe because the Acorn workers weren't offered enough juice on the deal?
Great group of scumbags you have chosen to ally yourself with, lipi. Not surprising for someone on the left--most lefty organizations are as ethical as Tammany Hall, but with fewer scruples.
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 05:43 PM (FGCRY)
31
btw, does effectively calling Giles and O'Keefe trailer trash qualify as hate speech? If someone described Van Jones as ghetto scum, would that be hate speech?
just asking if lipi thinks all people who live in trailer parks, ghettos, barrios, and similar places are trash undeserving of any consideration or respect.
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 07:37 PM (FGCRY)
32
zhombre, I have liberal acquaintances - I can't call them friends - who state that Republicans targeted ACORN just to get at Obama, so I don't see irony as often as I see stupidity.
Posted by: Jayne at September 24, 2009 11:36 PM (dwIL0)
33
Keep f***ing that chicken, Lipiwitz. You've really jumped the shark. It sounds like you're getting your legal talking points from those lefty human rights lawyers who are such experts on international law surrounding torture. Heh! Keep that caterpillar away from me you brute!
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 24, 2009 11:57 PM (3O5/e)
34
jayne
That is just mouth-dropping unbelievable for any Obama supporter to utter. So further investigative journalism should explore further into the world of underage immigrants forced into prostitution in order to target Obama? Really?
Of course, for real prostitutes one doesn't have to go much farther than MSNBC....
Posted by: iconoclast at September 24, 2009 11:59 PM (O8ebz)
35
Here is something interesting:
http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/acornstudy/
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 25, 2009 12:51 AM (bhNGz)
36
"So further investigative journalism should explore further into the world of underage immigrants forced into prostitution" -- And exactly WHO'S idea was it to have underage immigrants forced into prostitution? Was it ACORN's or was it Giles and O'Keefe's? You can go to YouTube and replay the videos if you need reminding before answering the question as to WHO'S idea it was to have underage immigrants forced into prostitution. Obviously Giles and O'Keefe are not engaging in underage sex traffic and prostitution activities but neither is ACORN. The idea was Giles and O'Keefe's.
The disgusting aspect of this whole ACORN McCarthyism is the mainstream media. ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, NY Times, Washington Post, USA Today, LA Times...all of them. Of all the accusations and allegations against ACORN from all the Right-wing opinion generators, pundits and Republicans and their echo chamber, not one single member of the mainstream media ever asked any of them "where's your proof?" Never was there a "truth" litmus over this 3 year, non-stop partisan campaign of lies against ACORN and the Right's attempt to tie them in with every Democrat and RINO they could find.
The truth has finally been revealed:
http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/acornstudy/
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 25, 2009 05:38 AM (bhNGz)
37
"not one single member of the mainstream media ever asked any of them "where's your proof?""
No one asked "where's your proof" because they were capable of watching the video tapes to see for themselves that ACORN employees and supervisors freely, repeatedly offered their official advice on:
* the best ways to smuggle underage sex slaves into the U.S.,
* the best ways to commit tax fraud by claiming these underage sex slaves as dependents to the IRS, and
* the best ways for the pimp-turning-politician to use cutouts and fake fronts to politically shield himself from his illegal sources of income.
No non-pedophile wants any of their taxpayer money going to sponsor an organization that's advising people on how to maximize their profits while sexually exploiting young girls.
And that's why non-pedophiles are universally repulsed by ACORN's nationwide behaviour, and why government agencies that are involved with ACORN are scrambling to dissociate themselves from such a scummy and exploitative organization.
Posted by: Lipsfullofshit at September 25, 2009 06:19 AM (sPIAv)
38
Federal Whistle Blower Laws should protect them from any suit.
Posted by: Frank at September 25, 2009 06:48 AM (R80G6)
39
Federal Whistle Blower Laws? Have you even read the Federal Whistle Blower Laws? Can you even read? Go read up on the Federal Whistle Blower Laws Frank and then decide if these two hacks qualify.
And Lipsfullofmaturityandintelligence...talking about a crime is not illegal. DOING a crime is illegal. And the idea of sexually exploiting young girls was Giles and O'Keefe's according to the videos you hold so sacred. You're accusing ACORN of being pedophiles but by your own logic, it's Giles and O'Keefe who on the videos, are self-admitted pedophiles. Soon to be so far in debt it ain't even funny self-admitted pedophiles.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 25, 2009 04:13 PM (OX5qU)
40
Interesting stuff:
On September 23, Los Angeles Times media critic James Rainey reported that ACORN official Lavelle Stewart "told me this week" that when conservative videographers James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles came to Stewart's ACORN office in Los Angeles disguised as a pimp and prostitute, Stewart "tried to get the 'prostitute,' who claimed she had been beaten by her pimp, to go to a women's center." Stewart's reported statement and a police report filed by officials at ACORN's Philadelphia office undermine O'Keefe's and Giles' claims that they were never rebuffed at any of the ACORN offices they visited, and the videographers have yet to release the Los Angeles and Philadelphia videos.
"And visits to other ACORN offices have gone almost entirely unmentioned. Lavelle Stewart, a fair-housing coordinator in the group's Los Angeles office, told me this week that she tried to get the "prostitute," who claimed she had been beaten by her pimp, to go to a women's center.
"The fact she was not taking the help I offered her made me think something was not right," Stewart said. "It raised a red flag."
******************************
San Diego ACORN official also reported duo to police following encounter. In a September 22 article, the Associated Press reported that California police said an ACORN worker contacted them about "possible human smuggling":
Police say a worker with the activist group ACORN who was caught on video giving advice about human smuggling to a couple posing as a pimp and a prostitute had reported the incident to authorities.
National City police said Monday that Juan Carlos Vera contacted his cousin, a police detective, to get advice on what to with information on possible human smuggling.
Vera was secretly filmed on Aug. 18 as part of a young couple's high-profile expose.
Police say he contacted law enforcement two days later. The detective consulted another police official who served on a federal human smuggling task force, who said he needed more details.
The ACORN employee responded several days later and explained that the information he received was not true and he had been duped.
And you honestly believe these hacks are NOT getting sued? Come on!
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 25, 2009 04:57 PM (OX5qU)
41
More from mainstream media's decision to practice journalistic integrity today:
O'Keefe's dismissal of ACORN's claim that "the videos were doctored" undermined by report that they were. O'Keefe reportedly dismissed ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis' claim that the secretly filmed videos were doctored, stating, "They've lied every step of the way." But one video that reportedly "left out" an ACORN employee's statement that it would have nothing to do with a prostitution business undermines O'Keefe's claim. According to a report by CNN's Casey Wian that aired on the September 17 edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight, the videographers edited San Bernardino ACORN organizer Tresa Kaelke's statement that ACORN would not associate itself with prostitution. Wian said: "Left out of the originally released tape but included in a transcript the filmmakers later released is Kaelke's statement that ACORN would have nothing to do with their prostitution business."
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 25, 2009 05:02 PM (OX5qU)
42
Lipiwitz - Edited tape is not the same thing as doctored tape. Sorry, your claim does not fly. The ACORN employees have not been accused of any crimes that I am aware, only stupidly conspiring on tape to commit them if O'Keefe and Giles had gone further with their scam. To claim otherwise as you imply is false.
Your strawmen of the Philadelphia and LA office visits are just that at this point. Compare what O'Keefe, Gilea and Breitbart have said with your pillowbiting, bedwetting assertions. Nothing you have put forward contradicts what they have said. If you cannot see that you are even less intelligent than I thought.
If you want to accuse conservatives of spreading lies about ACORN, have the testicular fortitude to lay them out in a comment and defend them. Mkay?
Keep f***ing that chicken. I'm glad you don't care about this, 'cause it's sure taking up a bunch of your time.
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 25, 2009 07:48 PM (3O5/e)
43
These reps can easily say they knew it was all a hoax and played along with it
At which point their lawsuit collapses, since they chose to play along, aka "consented".
Furthermore, since it was only a hoax and the employees didn't mean it, why did ACORN fire them?
It should be no surprise that the Obama puppet is defending the ACORN criminals. What's really funny is that the Obama puppet doesn't think that Breitbart, et al., were aware of this possibility all along and have planned for it -- including how to use it to inflict maximum damage on Barack Obama and his support and endorsement of ACORN's criminal behavior.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at September 26, 2009 01:24 AM (1Izxt)
44
Lipiwitz - The Democrats in the House put a cutoff in ACORN funding in the continuing budget resolution. Open your good eye and at least see what the stiffs in your own party see.
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 26, 2009 10:53 AM (3O5/e)
45
I'm very interested to know EVERYTHING about the wonderful "community organizers" at ACORN.
- HOW do they train their "get out the vote" specialists? Do they teach forgery as competently as tax evasion?
- Why is this organization NOT recognized as a partisan organization by the federal or state government? Could they be playing the race card, perhaps?
- When will our "representatives" finally investigate this organization that has received taxpayer funding for how long?
Posted by: nomoretaxmoneytoacorn at September 26, 2009 04:28 PM (enUtG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 21, 2009
Intimidation and Domestic Terrorism at UNC Chapel Hill
Glenn Reynolds links this morning to an article that hits close to home, an apparent campaign by radical campus leftists at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill to destroy a campus group via threats of violence:
Is a major state university going to let radical groups silence a legitimate college organization and drive it off campus through a campaign of violence and intimidation?
That is just one of the important questions raised by the most recent incident involving the UNC-Chapel Hill student organization Youth for Western Civilization (YWC) and a coalition of radical leftist groups. Some of the radicals are connected to the school, such as the UNC chapter of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), while others are community-based and have no affiliation with UNC.
According to a Raleigh News & Observer report last week, anonymous flyers appeared on the Chapel Hill campus that provided the name, photograph, phone number, and home address of the YWC's faculty advisor, emeritus professor Elliot Cramer. The flyers asked, "Why is your professor supporting white supremacy?"
Nikhil Patel, the current YWC president, perceived an implied threat in the flyer. It was not the first time that the radicals used this approach to intimidate the YWC. At a YWC event in April that was violently disrupted by radicals, they directed the following chant at YWC members and in particular, last year's YWC president, Riley Matheson: "Against racists, we will fight. We know where you sleep at night."
Violence and the political left is nothing new, especially violence from the SDS.
And there is the possibility that the threats of violence from this generation of SDS radicals may have "teeth" provided by an SDS radical of days gone by with a violent past.
Until several years ago, Howard Machtinger was the Teaching Fellows Director at UNC's
School of Education. Prior to his academic career, Machtinger was best known for his activities as an active member of the SDS and it's more violent domestic terrorist offshoot, the Weather Underground. A recent article called
Time Bomb in the
San Francisco Weekly News alleges Machtinger was one of the bomb builders for the terrorist group, and alleges that he and Bernadine Dohrn were behind the Feb. 16, 1970 Park Police Station bombing that killed SFPD Officer Brian McDonnell.
Machtinger, 63, still lives locally in Durham, NC and remains politically active.
I'm not alleging that Machtinger is building bombs for the UNC-CH Students for a Democratic Society or is training a new generation of Weather Underground terrorists, but his past associations indicate a man willing to go to extremes to push his ideology, and his proximity to the UNC group and his ties to the campus make it reasonable to wonder if his influence plays a role in the recent threats that may drive Youth for Western Civilization off of UNC-Chapel Hill's campus.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:07 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
America badly needs a de-communization effort similar to the de-Nazification which happened in Germany after WWII. These scum are are entrenched in positions of influence throughout society.
McCarthy was right.
Posted by: Steve at September 21, 2009 10:36 AM (RYcYq)
2
Word. The Democrats were lost to Marxism in the forties. Sadly, Republicans flirt with it as well, generally claiming only to more efficiently administer programs clawing FROM EACH in accordance with their ability (to pay) and TO EACH in accordance with their bottomless needs. Political philosophies are not even relevant at this point. Just the basic math dooms SS, Medi-this and that, the various takeovers of the economy. Bah.
From the youngsters, much of the objection to the objections about Barack is that they amount to calling him a big Commie. They are only vaguely aware of why this should be objectionable but aware they are. Here are two questions for the Meathead in your life. Firstly, if Obama WERE a "Big Commie" (and we presume they agree that there is such a beast) what WOULD he be doing? Maybe nationalizing the banks? Medicine? The auto industry? Newspapers? Hmmm. As the wise Goldfinger said; once is bad luck, twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.
Secondly, if someone is calling Barackus a "Big Commie", so what? Just what is wrong with being a Commie? I think you will find their education spotty on that.
Posted by: megapotamus at September 21, 2009 11:00 AM (wJMs3)
3
the University of Kansas just hired as it's chancellor a prominent member of the ruling elite of UNCC. A PC selection that believes in the self esteem of students rather than the education of students. Bad Call Jayhawks
Posted by: bman at September 21, 2009 11:39 AM (xK1dQ)
4
Setting aside the clear threats of violence, the leftists are also trying to equate a type of civilization with race. As always. They think your race affects your point of view and how you would like to order your civilization. This exposes their own bigotry, especially with the clear example of the opposite in the form of the USA, where persons of all races can come together to form one civilization. This isn't just my interpretation of the interpretation of a few "fringe." Rather, it is so central to the idea of America that we print it on all our money. E. pluribus unum. Would they rather we say, "Out of many, many?"
Posted by: Silhouette at September 21, 2009 12:08 PM (+ZT5h)
5
Bman: virtually all college administrators at that level believe in the PC catechism, or a do a real fine job of reciting it. They are the Establishment now, the conformists, the ones who impose and enforce orthodoxy.
Posted by: Zhombre at September 21, 2009 07:25 PM (zzL++)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NEA/Obama Administration Target of Next Breitbart Corruption Probe?
It sure looks that way.
The President had a certain amount of plausible deniability when he tried to claim he didn't know how deeply corrupt ACORN was. After all he has only acted as a lawyer and trainer for them over a number of years.
But if someone in the White House is illegally using public funds to further the Administration's political agenda, we may just have the start of something here far worse than we ever could have imagined...
Update: Big Hollywood has the
audio and transcripts of a highly politicized call between carefully-selected pro-Obama artists and artist groups, the White House Office of Public Engagement, and the National Endowment for the Arts.
This is apparently a
direct effort by the Obama White House to contract out political propaganda favorable to their policy initiatives.
What was said on the call seems irrefutable. What laws were broken (if any) remains to be seen.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:46 AM
| Comments (32)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Particularly since we also have "Obama 2.0" and the first serious attempts to repeal the 22nd Amendment. This is an all-out war on the Republic.
Posted by: Jonathan Nolan at September 21, 2009 02:13 AM (vCmG9)
2
Far worse than you could have ever imagined, perhaps. I have no illusions about the potential depths of human depravity, nor about the moral or ethical status of the current administration. It has none of either. So there is very little that Barry Lackwit or his minions could attempt that would be worse than I could ever imagine.
Posted by: wolfwalker at September 21, 2009 07:41 AM (OoSEZ)
3
AWESOME!!! Somebody is finally exposing Bush's Faith Based Initiatives program!!! SWEET!!! Unfortunately...that was considered legal by your "other" set of laws.
I'm intrigued. I'm sure it will be amusing. At least you had 60,000 tea-baggers and birthers who thought those ACORN videos were somewhat important.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 21, 2009 09:00 AM (OX5qU)
4
"we may just have the start of something here far worse than we ever could have imagined..."
I don't know - I can imagine pretty bad. Check out http://www.usdebtclock.org/ We're heading toward a crash that'll make the Great Depression look like the "Good ole days". The Fed will debase the currency in a futile attempt to maintain the entitlements by money printing; wiping out the savings of those who tried to plan responsibly. When reality finally dawns, they'll abandon those social contracts as well as the old currency. The currency replacement will be the "coup de grace" for whatever is left of our savings.
Remember, in the 1930's the U.S. was still mainly an agrarian economy. My mother's family had a family farm to move back to during the First Great Depression. I don't have that option.
The US dollar's failure will drive the world to a new standard reserve currency or a "world currency". I tell my wife that I hope I'm just a crazy old man, but at this point I don't see how it turns out any other way...
Posted by: Diogenes Online at September 21, 2009 09:17 AM (2MrBP)
5
I read the article and there is a point to be made. How much tax-payer money has been funneled every year through the Faith Based Initiatives Program to the Family research Council to thrown that Value Voters meeting held every year. I noticed no Democrats are ever invited. You may be on to something.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 21, 2009 09:32 AM (OX5qU)
6
>>"Somebody is finally exposing Bush's Faith Based Initiatives program!!! SWEET!!! Unfortunately...that was considered legal by your "other" set of laws."
It was "considered legal" by the American courts. To you those probably represent another set of laws.
Posted by: Steve at September 21, 2009 09:57 AM (RYcYq)
7
>>"How much tax-payer money has been funneled every year through the Faith Based Initiatives Program to the Family research Council"
Shouldn't you have an answer to your moronic questions BEFORE you pose them, pedophile?
Posted by: Steve at September 21, 2009 10:00 AM (RYcYq)
8
Here's a newsflash.
"The head of a community reform organization faces sentencing after pleading no contest to two counts of criminal sexual contact with a minor in Torrance County. Ben McGartland of Albuquerque, head of the New Mexico chapter of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, was charged in July in state District Court in Estancia with 10 counts, including second-degree criminal sexual penetration of a minor, three counts of criminal sexual contact, attempt to commit a felony, kidnapping, concealing identity, two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of marijuana."
Since Timmy Evans is still posting here I guess he has not been busted. Yet.
Posted by: Steve at September 21, 2009 10:30 AM (RYcYq)
9
The NEA should be abolished. The Constitution's only reference to the Arts was in Article I, Section 8, [8] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
It specifically gives only one avenue to promote progress os science and useful arts, which does not include funding.
If we followed the Constitution, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
lipowitz - if you truly believe that government funding of faith-based organizations was bad, then you should be just as appaled by the politicization of the NEA. Bush is gone - move on.
Posted by: SouthernRoots at September 21, 2009 11:34 AM (FJRFk)
10
"If we followed the Constitution, we wouldn't be having this discussion."
Constitution?? We have a Constitution? Who knew...
Certainly our current ruling class in D.C. doesn't.
Posted by: Diogenes online at September 21, 2009 12:03 PM (2MrBP)
11
Um, Lip,
I'm not real certain I can find a common point between your "progressive" friends in the .gov using a taxpayer-funded department of gov to further spread their propaganda and any money that was voted to a PRIVATE non-profit by Congress. Can you enlighten me?
DIdn't think so.
Posted by: emdfl at September 21, 2009 02:27 PM (Mkonf)
12
Lipiwitz is really getting desperate with the pivot and distract strategy.
Hey, look over there, BUNNIES!!!!
ACORN and Owebama's pitiful performance has put him over the edge.
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 21, 2009 06:51 PM (3O5/e)
13
If Federal employees participated, wouldn't that involve the Hatch Act?
Posted by: mark l at September 22, 2009 08:40 AM (WGbtD)
14
With Holder as AG, this goes nowhere.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at September 23, 2009 01:47 PM (nLRmO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 20, 2009
West Salem Street, Apex, NC
Just outside the shops and cafes of downtown Apex, NC is this yard display in front of a home being renovated. One is a two-sided sign slamming Obamacare, and the other pleading "STAND UP AMERICA STOP OBAMA'S CRIMES."
Click picture for larger image.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
04:22 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Heh. I saw that on the way home from the vet the other day.
Which begs the question: were you following me?
Posted by: Russ. Just Russ. at September 20, 2009 05:35 PM (YyAwk)
2
I was thinking the same this Russ. I was in Apex over the weekend and thought I saw a suspicious looking character in the car behind me. Must have been the Tea Party swastika on his car. Serioulsy though, I do get a chuckle every time I drive by that house.
Tarheel Repub out!
Posted by: Tarheel Repub at September 21, 2009 09:10 AM (AqLYg)
3
So it's true - apparently North Carolina IS a hotbed of racism!!!1!!eleventy!
Posted by: Tim at September 21, 2009 01:11 PM (3Wewy)
4
LOL @ "downtown Apex".
Looks bustling.
Posted by: anon at September 26, 2009 06:23 PM (mg30P)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 19, 2009
First Lady: Women "Crushed" by Current Healthcare System
Michelle Obama said women are being "crushed by the current structure of our health care" because they often are responsible for taking care of family illnesses, arranging checkups and monitoring follow-up care.
"Women are the ones to do it," she said to an audience of 140 people, including representatives from groups such as the Women's Chamber of Commerce and the National Council of Negro Women. "Mothers are the ones that do it. And many women find themselves doing the same thing for their spouses."
I missed the First Fashion Victim's
speech yesterday. I took my wife to the doctor after she had been ill with a cold for the past several days. I wanted to have her checked out because she wasn't getting any better and I wanted to make sure she didn't have any of the more serious viruses that seem to be going around. While there, trying to occupy an impatient, cranky, and ill toddler, we also had her foot looked at, as she had been experiencing severe pain since the night before.
Our primary care physician then sent us across the hall to radiology, so that my wife could get her foot x-rayed. We then went back to our primary care doctor, who saw what could be a stress fracture. We'll find out more when the radiologist has a chance to look at it Monday. Until then, we're trying to keep her off her feet as much as possible.
Later in the afternoon I took the baby to her pediatrician. she had a rash on her face and left leg, and had felt warm when we were at the wife's office visit earlier in the day. The pediatrician checked her over, and thinks that the rash could be contact dermatitis or potentially the same virus my wife has; apparently the rash component is a symptom that shows in children, but rarely in adults.
I missed a critical day of work to take care of my family. A major advertising campaign is rolling out and our marketing group is play a key role in meeting an aggressive deployment schedule. I'm the team lead for production, but my family came first. As a result of putting my family, the rest of my team had to readjust their schedules. In addition to this campaign, I'd committed to another time-sensitive project running concurrently, and was unable to meet my obligation there, either.
I love what I do, who I work for, and the team with which I work. They are extremely intelligent, knowledgeable, and hard-working, and I felt very guilty for having to take a personal day right when they needed me the most.
But family comes first.
My wife is feeling a little better this morning. I'm setting up her crutches so that she can go to our older daughter's soccer game. I'm the team's coach as well, so I'm packing two cars, one with my gear for the team, and the other with a folding chair, some toys for the toddler, her stroller, snacks etc. Grandma is going to help watch the baby on the sideline.
When the game is over, I'll take everyone home, unpack the cars, and take care of my family, the healthy and the sick. If I get them to bed at a reasonable hour tonight, I can log in and see how much work I can make up.
But healthcare is just a women's issue, so I'll manage.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:58 AM
| Comments (31)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Beyond the surface idiocy of her statements, is she trying to tell us that Obamacare will reduce the burdens of "current structure of our healthcare"? So there are no schedules under Obamacare? Someone from the state run clinic will call you to tell you when little Johnny or Little Suzy are to come in for a check up?
Why do I get the feeling that she hasnt ever scheduled a checkup for her kids or REALLY dealt with one of them having the flu?
Posted by: Mick Kraut at September 19, 2009 11:50 AM (WJ7Y9)
2
Mrs. Obama's point, in addressing such a mean country, is merely trying to follow traditional Democrat thinking. She clearly sees all American women as a potential victim group if only she can convince them that they're being cruelly oppressed (by their husbands? Their children? Their doctors?) and that only the loving arms of Michelle Obama, those magnificent, storied arms of song and legend, backed by the federal government, can provide blessed relief.
Imagine a victim group comprising half the population! Get them all on SIEU membership rolls, push their underage little weasels into ACORN financed brothels, assign all women lawyers to sue their oppressors ("your honor, it's only right that my client's children's piggy banks be forfeited to pay for the pain my client has suffered at their runny nosed hands..."), and America can finally be transformed! Yes we can!
Posted by: mikemcdaniel at September 19, 2009 11:58 AM (YKc1G)
3
I remember the days when working out the nothing-overlaps-anything schedules for 3 hyperactive children (by our choice, school and doctors visits, by their independent choices some subset of marching band, orchestra, soccer (3 leagues), softball (2 leagues), outdoor environmental (don't really know what to call it) program, church and affiliated activities, out-of-town travel, and a lot of stuff I have forgotten about.
Then my wife got breast cancer, tore a rotator cuff or two, got two knees replaced, and I developed eye and heart issues that require visits to a number of places.
Feller could get bitter about some of this denigration.
Posted by: Larry Sheldon at September 19, 2009 12:04 PM (OmeRL)
4
>Why do I get the feeling that she hasnt ever scheduled a checkup for her kids or REALLY dealt with one of them having the flu?
Of course she hasn't. Her mother took care of all that.
Why, just having one baby kept her and BO from attending church for years as he explained missing Reverend Wright's comments. "Everyone knows how difficult taking a baby to church is."
Posted by: History Chaser at September 19, 2009 12:13 PM (D72TY)
5
Playing the race card didn't make us want government run health care, so now they will try the sex card.
The case has been made and we have decided that this plan stinks. The only question is if the Democrats can ram it through anyways.
Why they want to continue to insult us in the process beyond me.
-Bri
Posted by: Bri at September 19, 2009 12:13 PM (ykOvo)
6
Not mentioned was the money quote wherein Michelle denounces the fact that young women, sub-30, incur premiums 25% higher than young gents. Of course, as a former medical professional, Michelle may recall that females, human and otherwise, are the ones that bear the babries. That is covered and therefore must be paid for. It seems that the Obamas are ignorant of the simple facts of insurance as they are ignorant of so, so much. But if Michelle is weighing in I suppose it is only proper and fair game that her career in the healing arts is scrutinized. Hey, she was making $300k doing PR for a hospital, of course only AFTER Barry became a bonafide Senator so obviously she is an expert to whom attention should be paid.
Posted by: megapotamus at September 19, 2009 04:38 PM (VSksv)
7
Crazy stuff. I hope your family is feeling better.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 19, 2009 09:32 PM (bhNGz)
8
>>"Michelle denounces the fact that young women, sub-30, incur premiums 25% higher than young gents."
I'm sure she'll next denounce the fact that young man pay auto insurance rates which are much higher then those for young women.
Posted by: Steve at September 19, 2009 10:01 PM (S24h1)
9
Just think, under Obamacare you would have to spend about 18 hours getting your wife seen much less another day for the child. Forget the X-Ray the same day or week. Why do I know? Because Louisiana has the socialist system for its lower income citizens. All doctors who train here are very familar with it. If you want to see what is coming, I will gladly show you what to expect, it will definitely make you sick.
As to Black mothers taking care of their kids, I haven't seen that in over 30 years in the business. It is always the grandmother.
Posted by: David at September 19, 2009 10:09 PM (k1mBN)
10
I find it hard to sympathize with Mrs. Obama. She seems so angry and insincere that she makes my teeth itch. And David is right, at least it's this way here in Houston. The black grandmothers do all the schlepping of kids to doctors, taking them to baseball practice, shopping, etc. Of course, now Mrs. Obama has the skilled and infinitely patient White House staff to handle these and other emergencies. They are the real "pros" here. They have my sympathies, since Mrs. Obama seems to be as short-tempered as Mrs. Clinton.
As for you CY, you seem to be the paradigm of a good modern husband. Your wife is a lucky woman.
Marianne
Posted by: Marianne Matthews at September 19, 2009 11:32 PM (VbbNx)
11
BRAVO to you!! you are a fantastic husband and father so it goes w/o saying you are Conservative. I as a woman DO NOT want to spend a WHOLE day waiting to see a doctor for myself or my children and if this monstrosity of a bill goes through the level of care will be horrendous. I work very hard for the insurance I have and if every low level lazy welfare queen gets to have the same insurance as I do I will be FORCED to have my care lowered to their expectations. Mrs. I Won is a LIAR just like her husband, now where is Joe Wilson?
Posted by: Jaded at September 20, 2009 10:41 AM (1I7uq)
12
How dare you give such a beautiful example of the sacrifices inherent in family life? Don't you know that people like yourself are ruining the public debate over health care by injecting it with reality? /scarcasm
Ditto to what Mick Kraut and History Chaser said; the Obamas don't live in the real world. Every time Michelle opens her mouth we're reminded of that fact.
Posted by: RandomThoughts at September 20, 2009 06:31 PM (tqqUo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 17, 2009
Pelosi: "He Hit Me Back First!"
In a summer where ACORN-affiliated union thugs took the President's advice to hit protesters back "twice as hard" quite literally, it's now amazing to hear House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's born-again concerns of political violence erupting from harsh rhetoric.
This is the same woman who claimed Obamacare protesters
carried swastikas to townhall meetings, and has been silent as Americans have been attacked as racists and radicals by everyone from officials within the Administration itself and Congress to street-level loonies.
Perhaps if Pelosi raised her voice earlier, when SEIU union thugs were beating people at town halls, or when MoveOn.org activists were
cannibalizing elderly protesters on the streets, I'd find her new-found fears more legitimate.
As it now stands, she sounds like a child complaining that she might get hit back first.
Update: It's also interesting that Pelosi only recalled the political violence from the late 70s that affected liberals. The Park Police station bombing in 1970 and the
bomb plot against conservative California state senator John V. Briggs and dozens of other bombings, shooting, and robberies committed by left-wing terrorist groups don't seem to have troubled her at all.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
05:20 PM
| Comments (33)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
If Pelosi is "concerned" about political violence, it's because she and the Leftists are planning some.
I'm a happy and peaceful person, myself. But I've got enough firearms to equip a couple of platoons, with plenty left over for me, and I'm still buying all the ammo I can afford, every time I can afford it.
In other words, I trust those crocodile tears from Pelosi just like I trust most of the avowals of "Good Faith" from the Left, which is not at all. We may see a false flag riot, or worse, coming up any day now.
Be nice, be civil and respectful, but keep your powder dry, folks. We may well need it.
Posted by: jefferson101 at September 17, 2009 07:05 PM (hym18)
2
Yeah, but why highlight leftists violence. Even you can understand that.
Posted by: bill-tb at September 17, 2009 07:08 PM (iiiMw)
3
This radical liberal is the best asset the Republican Party has.
Posted by: Rick at September 17, 2009 07:25 PM (FWmwx)
4
This is the woman who allows Code Pink to disrespect military recruiters in her district? THis is the woman that wanted ROTC banned from universities -- and joined the groups that ran the military personnel from their booths at job fairs?
Nancy Pelosi was very quiet when conservatives were booed and threatened at Columbia University.
Nancy Pelosi -- your crazy old aunt's deranged mother.
Posted by: Karen at September 17, 2009 08:05 PM (uSWi+)
5
Isn't govt funding of an organization that would use sexual slavery of children to fund political campaigns an incitement to violence? Would violence be justified to end such a thing? If congress refuses to end support for ACORN and Holder does not use RICO against such an organization, would violence against ACORN or their supporters be morally justified to end support for sexual slavery of children. If the Dems keep using such corruption to fund their campaigns, they cannot criticize anybody for thinking about violence.
Posted by: David at September 18, 2009 12:02 PM (aFv9B)
6
jefferson101,
If Pelosi is "concerned" about political violence, it's because she and the Leftists are planning some.
BINGO! We have a winner!
That would give the Corruptocrats the "crisis" they have been waiting for. However, I do not think that many states would go along with them if they tried doing something drastic like declaring martial law and attempted to disarm the citizens. What they would end up with is a civil war, one they can not win.
Posted by: Nahanni at September 18, 2009 12:17 PM (S4wMM)
7
I am a 65 year old Vietnam Vet. I can remember the demonstrations put on by the "peace loving"
leftist college students and anti "WAR"
demonstrators. The demonstrations at the Republican convention, and adnauseum. All these leftist demos had violence as a common event.
All the Tea Partys, and the march on Washington
by normal working class people had to my knowledge, zero violent incidents. That said,
Nancy is right to be afraid. The people at the tea partys and march on Washington are the
backbone of America. The working class, tax paying contributers to our society. In other words, the same type of person who went to war during WW II and destroyed the National SOCIALIST
party and the Imperialist aggressors in Japan.
History shows in America
the most violence prone segment of our society is the LEFTISTS. History also shows that when the working class finally has enough, "Katy bar the door" These so called liberals, who are really not truly liberal unless you believe in their way, cannot comprehend the concept of pushing too hard and will learn the hard way to
"BEWARE THE FURY OF A PATIENT MAN" We as normal
thinking people who have learned to plan ahead and understand long term consequences and effects
will target the leaders and beaurocrats who order the restrictions on our civil rights. The
drones will automatically fall by the wayside.
These statists who preach that we must "share" only seem to be willing to share other peoples money, not their own. Lets see what time shows us.
Paul in Texas
Posted by: Paul at September 18, 2009 04:34 PM (rCmYM)
8
Paul, I keep posting the fact that Democrats should be very concerned regarding the recent protestors. These are not the usual leftists loons protesting, these are the bill payers of this country and are getting irate of continually be compelled to "water the weeds." In fact the "weeds" should also be concerned as their "free lunch" could come to an end.
Posted by: Rick at September 18, 2009 04:57 PM (FWmwx)
9
I found it odd that the Speaker of the House spent her time worrying about violence, but didn't try to use her office to help lower the level of the din.
This is sort of like telling a crowd with pitchforks that if they don't watch out somebody might get hurt, then wishing the crowd "Godspeed."
Posted by: Neo at September 18, 2009 09:52 PM (tE8FB)
10
I'm amazed at the emotional range that she can achieve despite the botox.
Posted by: zhombre at September 18, 2009 10:55 PM (zzL++)
11
I don't think Squeaky Fromm's assassination attempt on Gerald Ford entered Pelosi's mind.
Posted by: McClatchy Watch at September 19, 2009 02:15 AM (f3OQE)
12
Pelosi obviously is refering to Milk and Moscone as her arid eyes crust over. The only problem with THAT is that the so-called "political violence" in this instance was not like, say, James Earl Ray, committed by someone opposed to Milk's politics but by a disgruntled Dem apparatchik looking to redress his career grievances. I don't know how whatever rhetorical climate be blamed for that. Rather it seems the attitude of the life-long gub careerist is the motivator, that is if we need one other than the bitter derangement of one man, Dan White.*
*wiki refreshed recollections
Posted by: megapotamus at September 19, 2009 08:28 AM (YKjqt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Quick Thought About ACORN and the Media
I think what bothers me the most about this still-developing story is that we have a fake prostitute trying to expose the truth, while the real prostitutes in the media are trying to sandbag the story as much as possible.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:51 AM
| Comments (26)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Good point! On the other hand, now we know how Charlie Rangel got into such trouble with his taxes... he went to ACORN for advice.
Posted by: Scott W. Somerville at September 17, 2009 04:46 PM (IcQ5F)
2
Nobody cares. The story came out. We heard it. Time to move on. We don't care. Most of America thinks ACORN is a nut people. They just don't care. They did wrong. Government unanimously agreed to cut off funding. Justice served. Time to move on.
It's your obsession. Don't expect it to be everybody else's.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 18, 2009 10:04 AM (OX5qU)
3
By my count, Lipiwitz, your comment above is your 23rd about the ACORN scandal this week--more than any other poster, and that's just on this blog. Who knows how many other blogs you've left similar comments on?
You've certainly addressed it more often than I have, and I suspect with more words.
Not your obsession?
Somehow, I don't buy that.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at September 18, 2009 10:14 AM (WjpSC)
4
Here ya go...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32909302/ns/politics-washington_post/
And here is why we don't care...the truth"
"Though O'Keefe described himself as a progressive radical, not a conservative, he said he targeted ACORN for the same reasons that the political right does: its massive voter registration drives that turn out poor African Americans and Latinos against Republicans.
"Politicians are getting elected single-handedly due to this organization," he said. "No one was holding this organization accountable. No one in the media is putting pressure on them. We wanted to do a stunt and see what we could find."
Gotta love the kid's honesty. At least he has the balls to tell the truth compared to all the other cowards and their manufactured outrage over their illusive "values". This is why we don't care...we know the truth.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 18, 2009 11:31 AM (OX5qU)
5
Fake or not. The only avowed pimp, prostitute and brothel designer in the film is O'Keefe and his 'actress'.
Posted by: Jim at September 18, 2009 12:21 PM (i2Juz)
Posted by: tm at September 18, 2009 03:33 PM (ZlXVq)
7
"its massive voter registration drives that turn out poor African Americans & Latinos against Republicans"
Acorn is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corp and by use of that non-profit entity not allowed to provide services for one competitor over another.
Posted by: Rick at September 18, 2009 05:10 PM (FWmwx)
8
Posted by Rick at September 18, 2009 05:10 PM
"Acorn is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corp and by use of that non-profit entity not allowed to provide services for one competitor over another."
==============
RRRRRIIIIIGGGGGHHHHHTTTTT!!!!!
Posted by: Robert at September 18, 2009 05:59 PM (h5Ij+)
9
It's fun to watch Lipowitz become even more unhinged over something that doesn't matter to him. His weaseling makes as much sense as ACORN's repeatedly debunked excuses.
How many states are investigating them now? And their reaction is to conduct a sham "internal" audit with shills? That'll convince a lot of people everything is cleaned up!
We need more spokesweasel Scott Levenson!
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 18, 2009 09:39 PM (3O5/e)
10
ACORN is Obama's SS. These are the shock troops. When Obama declares to his witless minions "get in their faces" he is addressing ACORN, SEIU, MoveOn, the Obama for America crowd and of course your garden variety anti-American but ACORN/SEIU are the heavy troops; the finger-biters, the Van Jones green/reds. Their assault on our electoral system seen most closely by the Hillary PUMAs in the caucus states and the New Black Panther Party thuggery in PA were only the beginning. Their true goal was manipulation of the upcoming census to ensure that anti-Americans like Maxine Waters, Dennis Kucinich and a platoon of others predominate in our Legislature. The coup is postponed, for now. But these scum never rest. The money in your pocket, indeed all the product of your labors is like honey to them. They are determined to feast on you and yours in perpetuity. They will, like all Lefty/Progressive/Commie institutions, merely change their name and continue on with their same-old same-old if they may. Don't let it happen. Obama is the President of ACORN. Don't forget it. Ever.
Posted by: megapotamus at September 19, 2009 08:41 AM (YKjqt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
House Faces H.R.3571, the "Defund ACORN Act"
Text of a press release from N.C. Republican Rep. Walter B. Jones:
WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week U.S. Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC) became an original cosponsor of H.R. 3571, the Defund ACORN Act. This legislation, introduced by House Republican Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-OH), would sever all ties between the federal government and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).
"Recent news reports have described potentially criminal activity involving ACORN associates and, last year, ACORN was linked to multiple instances of voter registration fraud and other illicit activity," Congressman Jones said. "It's clear that ACORN is not capable of using federal funds in a lawful way."
It is estimated that ACORN has received more than $53 million in direct funding from the federal government since 1994, and has likely received substantially more indirectly through states and localities that receive federal block grants.
"The U.S. Census Bureau has already ended its partnership with ACORN, and I hope all other federal agencies follow suit – whether their ties to ACORN consist of partnerships or the awarding of federal funds," Jones continued. "Since other federal agencies may not voluntarily take similar action, Congress needs to stop this waste of taxpayer dollars by swiftly passing the Defund ACORN Act to immediately terminate all federal funding of ACORN and its affiliates."
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi finds herself in a tight spot. There is no justifiable defense of ACORN at this moment, considering that employees have been caught supporting tax fraud and the trafficking of minors for prostitution at five offices (thus far) without batting an eye.
But ACORN has long been an asset to the Democratic Party in general and this President in particular, who has literally volunteered his time to help make the organization what it is today. The DNC is also heavily invested in ACORN's symbiotic relationship with the Service Employees International Union, a group developed in parallel with ACORN and which has been responsible for acts of intimidation and violence during heath-care town hall meetings over the course of the August recess.
The House Democratic leadership and President Obama do not want to sever ties with ACORN.
The real question now seems to be whether they risk the political capital to obfuscate on ACORN's behalf so close to the 2010 elections with such popular disgust running against the group and their close alliance with the Democratic Party.
Update: The House voted to defund ACORN as part of a motion on a student loan bill. The bill passed
345-75.
Michelle Malkin has the
votes.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:34 AM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I think we ought to follow the trail of bread crumbs to where its likely to lead. The impeachment of Obama and many Democrats in Congress.
Posted by: Scott at September 17, 2009 10:42 AM (mqy6N)
2
Why am I, a registered non partisan who has voted Rep for years, being FORCED to support an organization which is obviously in bed with the Dem/Lib party and against most everything I have voted for? I am literally hurting my own Rep vote because of this FORCED support and alliance with this fraudulent group! This is insanity and tyranny and should be stopped!
Posted by: NoCAGal at September 17, 2009 04:24 PM (MSD2j)
3
Lock and load boys, lock and load, fix bayonets... this mess is gonna get ugly... the Capt.
Posted by: capt26thga at September 17, 2009 07:40 PM (BJeda)
4
Now for the real question:
Who were the 75 scumbags who voted against this bill?
Posted by: Anthony at September 17, 2009 10:27 PM (wUsav)
5
This vote was mostly for cover. The house and senate voted to defund on different bills. The congressman can claim to vote against ACORN, knowing all the while it will be scrubbed when they reconcile senate/house versions by the Democratic leadership. It is a starting point but we need to keep up the pressure so they don't pull the switch.
Posted by: RicardoVerde at September 17, 2009 11:06 PM (PBTsv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lunatic Fringe
Screwing over El Salvadoran girls and America's poor
at the same time, on your dime.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:55 AM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
ACORN San Diego Offers Assistance for Smuggling Child Prostitutes
From Big Government, another exposé that shows an ACORN employee—who claims to be a lawyer who does a lot of immigration work—offering to use his contacts in Mexico to help traffic a dozen 13-15-year-old girls across the border for the purpose of prostitution.
Part 1:
Part 2:
Playing devil's advocate, I could see the man wanting to collect as much information as possible if he had the intention of turning James and Hannah in to law enforcement. He did get James' cell phone number, collected details about times and places, and could have easily set them up. So it should be a simple matter to determine if the man reported the trafficking James and Hannah were attempting to engage in to the responsible authorities (he does, after all, make a claim about working with the district attorneys).
Unless James and Hannah file their next report from a San Diego jail, however, I'll assume the cops were never called.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:50 AM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
These kids demonstrate a real media savvy in their actions here. They didn't go down the street to their local ACORNies and pull this stunt once and then do a touchdown dance on TV. They anticipated much of the tactical response of ACORN and their supporters in gub. The "few bad apples" meme is obliterated. The instant counter of falsification does not fare well in the age of YouTube. ACORN is more toxic by far right now than Da Wright Rev could ever be. But they are not merely part of Barry's past, they were to be foundational for his radical future and ours. It is now safe, I think to say, that ACORN will play no public role in the census. This is a dagger to the heart of Barry's long term goals. SEIU/ACORN is a millstone now to the preening Dems more than it is a millstone around the American people, as it was meant to be. This is the biggest blow Team Barry has taken to date and that is saying something. This was a full spread impact; The Obamic is on fire, without power and taking on water. It's not great news since the nation is left at least temporarily rudderless but rudderless drift is preferable to full steam ahead towards a Soviet America. So breathe a bit easier. Today.
Posted by: megapotamus at September 17, 2009 10:19 AM (/HrWJ)
2
The information was passed on to a detective working for the local police station and the detective passed it along to the local DA.
This is video number 2 that Fox News and the Right-wing slander machine has broadcast as gospel without having a single ounce of journalistic integrity to do any attempt at fact-checking or verifying. It's easy to see where ACORN is going to make up for the lost funds from federal funding.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 19, 2009 11:06 PM (bhNGz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 16, 2009
So ACORN: Where's the Best Place to Smuggle Kids Across the Border for Sex?
Sorry. I'm simply speechless now.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:22 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I have to admit this raised my eyebrows..and not much gets me to do that. as already stated, no words.
side comment cause no time to make another post: yeah Stewart was piss funny. probably the funniest thing I have heard in 25 yrs. stunningly funny yet truthful in this instance.
THIS IS A POLITICAL SCANDAL.
I want to know why no one in Congress, the press, or the nation, is calling for an investigation (independent or otherwise) and hearings investigating ACORN & its administrators and if they ever knew about any legal protection/illegal cover up of ACORN employees doing similar illegal activities as recently uncovered by the two journalists who carried out the pimp/prostitute investigation?
...and I believe Obama should be called as a witness. We have to know how long this has been going on.
ALSO why did Obama & his TEAM OBAMA advisors promote and/or pay ACORN $800,000.00 during the presidential campaign, as well as coordinate with ACORN to develop and be on the list for Stimulus funds once Obama became POTUS?
I would like to know if the current POTUS, as a past representative of ACORN, ever promoted or tolerated this type of illegal behavior in his role of a legal counsel for ACORN?
I would like to know if Mr. Obama in his role as the POTUS, or any other member of the USA federal government, has known of this illegal ACORN activity while coordinating with ACORN for the Stimulus Bill as well as other federal govt programs & legislation?
why arent these questions being asked? If this had been Bush or Cheney working for a company, say like Haliburton, who was caught in illegal activity, or even allegations from whistle-blowers, EVERYONE KNOWS that hearings & and an independent prosecutor would have been called for by now. Look at the treatment of Alberto Gonzalez & Libby.
It is astonishing that this is NOT getting more scrutiny in regards to the Executive Branch's association with ACORN, either now or when the POTUS was working for them in a admin/legal counsel capacity, as well as the rest of the federal govt's association with this corrupt organization.
if there was EVER a case for the implementation of RICO, this is it.
Prosecutorial & investigative dragnets were ideally created for a national criminal scandal such as this.
just sayin...you have a national organization who has now been caught in a patttern of rampant illegal activity throughout the country. And this organization was once administrated and legally counseled by the current POTUS and no one wants to know what he knew, and when he knew it?
very strange & very scary.
Posted by: lu-ee at September 16, 2009 11:08 PM (QTvDP)
2
Some great questions lu-ee.
Please don't hold your breath waiting for the answers.
Hell, some of us would be happy just seeing Obama's school transcripts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey LIPSHITS - John Stewart got your tounge???
Posted by: slimedog at September 16, 2009 11:34 PM (2q+ht)
3
"LIPSHITS" bwaaaAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!! i know exactly who you mean. yeah he's been quite on this whopper of a scandal.
i would too if my presidential pick had ties to an organization that accepts & abets international kiddie prostitution in poor USA urban areas. we should call it "sex, truth, and videotapes"
hahahahahaha
this is the democrats version of the Harding administration fiasco. where is Biden when you need him to say something stupid about this whole thing. Where is that pin-cushion of a VP?
sad. we get the leaders we deserve has never been more true. ACORN & Obama and all the nasty baggage both of them bring, are a wonderful fit for liberals. Both of these groups promote, thru toleration, of all of this immoral & illegal activities to begin with and now they find they are in bed with them and imploding.
oh f'n well...
Posted by: lu-ee at September 16, 2009 11:59 PM (QTvDP)
4
hey lu-ee -- is Obama in any of those videos? Is Obama President of ACORN? Where is this a political scandal for anybody but you?
I'm with CY on this...I'm speechless. Where the hell does ACORN get these degenerates? I also don't care. ACORN is your obsession, not mine.
They clean up their act, they get their funding back. It's going to be that simple.
Now...if we can only find out all of those Blackwater employees who paid a dollar (that's $1.00) to repeatedly rape children ages 8 to 10 while overseas in Iraq. Think the pimp and his whore posing as journalists can help out with that or should the DoJ just continue to investigate it like they have been?
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 01:09 AM (bhNGz)
5
>>"I'm with CY on this...I'm speechless."
No, you are only "speechless" because you don't give a rats ass about the story except to the extent it hurts the Democtrats.
>>"if we can only find out all of those Blackwater employees blah blah blah"
Textbook troll, try to change the topic away from the one that makes you look bad. You care about Iraqi kids being raped no more than you do about the ACORN story.
People like you (and I use "people" in the loosest possible sense) make me embarrassed to be a member of the human race.
Posted by: Steve at September 17, 2009 02:55 AM (eORJj)
6
Please Steve, give examples, credible verifiable examples as to where this hurts Democrats.
The division of ACORN is the housing division so none of the activists or affiliations of activist organizations are bothered by this nuisance. Federal funding only makes up 2% of ACORN's total revenue stream so it's not like they're going bankrupt anytime soon. Heck, I just donated $50 to ACORN to do my part in helping this 40 year old institution to continue it's proven track record of doing outstanding community service. I'm pretty positive I'm not the only one. $50 to help them rebound from this modern day racial McCarthyism and the irresponsible but not illegal behavior of a handful of stupid employees. I mean, it's not like they actually did anything illegal like Mark Foley or the Evangelical Church in Florida distributing child pornography that Miss Giles' father and his church in Miami were affiliated with. Nothing that bad now is it? I think not.
ACORN's housing division will rebound with much more strict guidelines on proper, ethical conduct and they will subsequently get back their 2% revenue stream from the federal government which probably is less than the amount of donations they're receiving now. The pimp and his whore posing as journalists managed to get a handful of people fired which is a good thing and probably pissed off every single minority in this country. I wouldn't be the first in line to want to walk down the street alone with either one of these two missing rocket scientists.
You can obsess over this for a while in some sort of massive victory over getting a handful of people fired. Proud of ya! But damage control is already in play and the clean up has already begun and well...health care reform is the priority of the Left right now. Not some shallow and empty victory of racial McCarthyism from a insignificant minority who can only attack a activist organization because they lack the power and the might to attack anything bigger. WHO HOO!!!
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 04:44 AM (bhNGz)
7
And Steve, if you're that embarrassed to be part of the human race, please by all means...drop out.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 04:45 AM (bhNGz)
8
Now here is some massive corruption that ACORN needs to be thoroughly investigated for ASAP:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/07/washington/07bremer.html?_r=3&ref=world
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 06:03 AM (bhNGz)
9
Please Steve, give examples, credible verifiable examples as to where this hurts Democrats.
One of Barack Obama's first big "community organizer" jobs involved ACORN in 1992. Obama also trained ACORN employees. He represented ACORN in court. Obama worked with and protested with ACORN. His campaign donated $800,000 to ACORN in 2008 for voter registration efforts.
And, ACORN even canvassed for Obama last year.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/09/another-acorn-cracked-hannity-releases.html
Posted by: Poor dummy Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 06:57 AM (m5a+T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Daily Show Slams ACORN and the MSM
Sure, you've probably seen it elsewhere already, but it's worth watching again.
Somewhere in Washington, DC, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama are sweating bullets that their allies are falling apart.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:17 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Thanks Jon Stewart.
Meanwhile Sullivan and Charles Johnson have turned into ACORN apologists, worrying that the right wing blogs are...well, too mean.
Andrew Sullivan speaks about Charles Johnson:
16 Sep 2009 09:40 pm
The Continued Evolution Of Charles Johnson
The pioneer of the anti-Jihadist blog, Little Green Footballs, is repulsed by some of the developments on the populist, racist right. He's right to be; and has the courage to say so. For that he is subjected to the usual mau-mauing. Check out his blog. It's an Yglesias Award in motion.
Mau-mauing? That sounds rather racist from a Brit? So what's next, will CJ and Sully both appear on Bill Maher's show, followed by a few doobs and a post show circle jerk?
Posted by: Joe at September 16, 2009 11:56 PM (0Gde6)
2
Funny. True, but funny. As i said before, ACORN needs to clean their house and lose all federal funding until they do.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 01:41 AM (bhNGz)
3
>>"As i said before, ACORN needs to clean their house"
If lying was a felony, you'd spend the rest of your miserable life behind bars.
Posted by: Steve at September 17, 2009 02:57 AM (eORJj)
4
Yeah Steve but could you prove it.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 06:02 AM (bhNGz)
5
Nancy's only sweating whether she will be able to get enough illegals to pick the grapes in her vineyards this year.
obumbles is sweating whether acorn saved his emails with the directions on how to smuggle those children into the US.
Posted by: emdfl at September 17, 2009 09:19 AM (Mkonf)
6
Who could be surprised that the party of slavery on a national scale would find nothing objectionable to a bit of sex slavery on a neighborhood scale. This crowd thinks globally but acts locally.
Posted by: megapotamus at September 17, 2009 10:23 AM (/HrWJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACORN in Denial and Retreat
First, they tried to claim it was an isolated incident, and threatened lawsuits.
Then they tried to claim it was the actions of a few bad apples, which they subsequently terminated.
After New York, they gave up the pretense of firing their employees for enabling fraud in the interests of trafficking in minors for the purpose of prostitution. By that point, with the state AG starting an
investigation, such a fig leaf was obviously no longer of use.
And ACORN San Bernardino still employs the worker who not only was willing to help commit fraud for the lust of pedophiles, but who was
concerned over the safety and love life of our young madam-to-be.
Seemingly radioactive, all ACORN can do now is hunker down and hope that they can survive being exposed. They've
stopped taking new clients, perhaps fearful of what more hidden cameras might find. As
Ace noted, they're playing by the crisis management handbook.
The real question is whether or not activist filmmaker James O'Keefe and journalism student Hannah Giles have enough damaging undercover videos capturing ACORN-trained employees encouraging and supporting fraud and slavery to do the criminal enterprise in.
Human Events says a new video is supposed to drop tonight, and says their are more to follow.
For their part, ACORN
continues to threaten on one hand as they apologize on the other. They are ashamed of getting caught, but hardly remorseful.
They are thugs and they are monsters, exploiting those they claim to represent, and they must be shut down.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:37 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The latest video from San Diego shows the ACORN guy telling the couple to bring their underage girls to Tijuana, where he has good contacts that can facilitate getting them into the country illegally.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) at September 16, 2009 09:59 PM (nas9l)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Well, You Know, Kids Sometimes Don't Always Like What Their Parents Want Them to Do."
I know we have several months remaining, but I'd still like to nominate this as the Parental Understatement of the Year.
Christian Pebbles of Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District said the teen made it clear why she started the blaze, which damaged church pews.
"She hates the church and she worships the devil," Pebbles said. "That's the reason why."
Pebbles said the teen was taken into custody on suspicion of felony arson.
"Well, you know, kids sometimes don't always like what their parents want them to do," said Annette Hilt, the suspect's mother. "Everybody knows that."
Yeah, remember that time when you were a kid and rebelled by setting fire to a church building with dozens of people inside?
Me neither.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:11 AM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Just came across this blog today, and really enjoyed it! Keep up the good work.
I posted a hilarious YouTube video about Obama and the current debate over the size of government I found today on my site. Check it out:
http://rjmoeller.com/2009/09/obama-and-the-white-stripes-a-youtube/
Posted by: RJ Moeller at September 16, 2009 12:59 PM (C150d)
2
HUH?
Being a conservative and believing in personal freedom I sometimes have such periods of cognitive dissonance because I read stories like this and can't help but think that some people just shouldn't be allowed to breed.
Posted by: PRM at September 16, 2009 02:03 PM (5sGLG)
3
Forced sterilization is a very bad idea.
Posted by: brando at September 16, 2009 02:50 PM (IPGju)
4
Isn't church burning supposed to be a hate crime?
Oh wait, it was an LDS church in CA not a Baptist church in the South.
Posted by: MikeM at September 16, 2009 03:39 PM (fqvpi)
5
I liked the last sentence of the article.
"Fire officials said the goal is to make sure that the girl receives counseling, not to necessarily punish her."
Need to change the definition of counseling to "Beating the stupid out of them."
Posted by: MikeM at September 16, 2009 03:44 PM (fqvpi)
6
MikeM
In the words of Ron White. "You just can't fix Stupid."
Posted by: Matt at September 16, 2009 05:45 PM (54Fjx)
7
Ah, kids these days. Heh heh heh... gotta laugh at the wacky shenanigans they get themselves up to. I remember once, I swiped my brother's wagon to haul dirt for a bunker I was digging. And then there was the time I scratched my parent's car getting my bicycle out of the carport.
Same thing, right? Oh, those nutty kids.
Posted by: Steve Skubinna at September 17, 2009 09:39 AM (Vcyz0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
FBI: Be On Alert For TATP Terror Plot
Unstable men with unstable chemicals. This isn't good:
Counter-terrorism officials on Tuesday urged local police to be on the lookout for evidence of homemade bombs, a day after the FBI raided four apartments in Queens looking for bomb-making components.
Police departments are being urged to be on the lookout for specific indicators of terrorist activity.
"I believe it's prudent to put that information out. We welcome it," said NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly.
The directive speaks of the possible use of hydrogen peroxide in bombs, and to look for people who may have burns on the face, hands and arms.
Hydrogen peroxide is a key ingredient in the home-brew explosive
triacetone triperoxide, or TATP. It is a very unstable and made with relatively common chemicals, and has been used in
numerous plots around the world.
The good news?
Many terrorists have blown themselves up attempting to create the mixture, and often times incorrectly manufactured TATP refuses to detonate.
Hopefully the exposure of the plot will send the plotters on the run and foil their plans. That said, if you happen to be near someone carrying a pungent, leaking backpack, take the only sensible precaution, and
push him in front of a bus.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:18 AM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Push someone in front of a bus for carrying a leaking pungent bag? That would be me with my wife's three-day old meatloaf!
Now waitaminutehere!
Posted by: Mike at September 16, 2009 04:52 PM (eXdIs)
2
No, put one round between his running lights.
Posted by: Federale at September 17, 2009 10:54 AM (UQeEa)
3
Don't do that! You might blow up the bus!
Posted by: Steve at September 17, 2009 02:11 PM (TaHHC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACORN: A Party to Sexual Slavery?
To put it mildly, Democratic blog No Quarter has developed something of a credibility problem over the years for past threats and outbursts that didn't pan out, but one of their writers does get credit for making a very interesting observation this evening in regards to their own party amid the snowballing scandal of ACORN offices showing themselves quite willing to commit fraud and accept the trafficking and prostitution of foreign minors.
Linda Anselmi
writes:
The 13th Amendment to the Constitution was passed by the Congress on January 31, 1865, and ratified by the states on December 6, 1865 and it declares that "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude…shall exist within the United States."
We claim we abolished slavery in the US, but we did not. We only passed a law and made it illegal. We said as a society we find the acts and practices of slavery so reprehensible and inherently harmful to our society, that hence forth we will not tolerate them.
But slavery still exist in America today. We just don’t see it. It is no longer this easily identified black vs white, North vs South, leg chains and bull whips image that we can point at in disgust and outrage. It has gone underground and become embedded in our society.
Anselmi further cites the Department of Justice,
noting:
...Under federal law, the technical term for modern-day slavery or coerced labor is "severe forms of trafficking in persons." ...
defined as 1) sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion or in which the person induced to perform such an act is under 18;
or 2) the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion, for the purpose of subjecting that person to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.
...Trafficking covers the use of minors for commercial sexual activity even if there is no force, fraud, or coercion.
Put simply, ACORN officials in Baltimore, Washington, New York, San Bernardino, and as-yet-unknown other cities have willingly accepted and apparently condoned sexual slavery. There is no indication that any of the officials that have gone on camera have attempted to contact law enforcement. In fact, they did not seem overtly disturbed at all.
Perhaps there is a perfectly acceptable excuse for shockingly consistent behavior among ACORN employees in various locations. Perhaps it has something to do with the way they were trained, or they were told to act this way by legal counsel (
someone allegedly filled both those roles as a "
community organizer"

.
Or perhaps it is exactly what it looks like: a group so steeped in corruption and criminality that even the human trafficking and prostitution of minors doesn't horrify them at all.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:54 AM
| Comments (40)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The question is just screaming to be posed: How many ACORN locations did these "investigators (Inquisitors?) have to infiltrate before they were able to implicate three corrupt officials?
Has anyone bothered to ask that question?
I smell a rat. Better still, I smell a FOX.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Posted by: Tom Degan at September 16, 2009 11:46 AM (Gzl9F)
2
Well Tom, this isn't the same thing as the Gov't working to get Delorean to take some coke. Even if the visited 10 places and only got these places to not bat an eye at what they were saying, that is still too much of a pattern when considering the other things ACORN is known for. Your argument may hold merit if A: ACORN wasn't being investigated for fraud in several states, and B: this was on maybe one office out of them testing say ALL of ACORN offices.
Oh, and YOUR tax dollars went to fund a brothel of under-aged illegals (or so the ACORN offices believed)in, so far these cases. . . you feel that is a good usage of your money?
Posted by: JP at September 16, 2009 12:05 PM (VxiFL)
3
"you feel that is a good usage of your money"
Yeah, he probably does. Can you believe that some people actually defend this garbage? Yuck.
I don't think that children should be raped, but that's just me.
Posted by: brando at September 16, 2009 12:17 PM (IPGju)
4
Cool, fixed. Sorry about the junk comments.
Posted by: Kevin at September 16, 2009 02:52 PM (hNk8s)
5
Golly gee gosh, Tom Degan, that's a dadgum gosh darn good question.
Here's another one for you, buckaroo. How many Acorn offices did the investigators visit in which the Acorn folks turn them down AND IMMEDIATELY REPORTED THE INCIDENT TO THE POLICE?
Inquiring minds, like wanna know and stuff.
You know what, pilgrim, I smell something too.
Posted by: George Bruce at September 16, 2009 04:12 PM (H/L6i)
6
"ACORN offices showing themselves quite willing to commit fraud and accept the trafficking and prostitution of foreign minors" -- I see no evidence of this on behalf of ACORN but there is evidence of this on tape that the pimp and prostitute were willing to engage in this activity and were soliciting advice on how to continue this criminal activity which makes them guilty of conspiracy. Despite a few ACORN representatives acting incredibly stupid and irresponsible, they broke no laws.
This pimp and his whore posing as journalists visited over 30 ACORN offices across the country on a witch hunt to find 3. Who funded this? All the other ACORN offices told the pimp and his whore to leave immediately and they had no interest in engaging in their criminal activity that the pimp and his whore were committing conspiracy for. The Philadelphia ACORN office even called the police and reported their criminal activity and the police report is available online. Where are all those tapes? There has to be hours upon hours of video footage showing the majority of ACORN offices and their representatives engaging in moral and responsible behavior and not engaging in highly illegal behavior being instituted by a pimp and his whore posing as journalists. Where is all that video footage? Why won't they make all that footage available? There must be an obvious and biased reason for it. This video footage would prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the majority of ACORN offices and their representatives were quite moral and responsible citizens when it comes to the pimp and his whore having an alarming amount of knowledge and expertise when it comes to prostitution, brothels and underage sex trafficking. An investigation should be conducted indeed.
The pimp and his whore posing as journalists reported a murder from a San Bernadino ACORN representative without confirming or verifying if it was credible in which it wasn't. Real journalists would have known to do that.
The Baltimore D.A. are preparing to bring charges against the pimp and his whore posing as journalists (guy couldn't keep the camera off her ass) because apparently in Baltimore, it's a felony to record individuals without their knowledge or consent. Real journalists would have known that.
I call upon the pimp and his whore posing as journalists to release ALL THE TAPES!!! All their encounters with all the ACORN offices and all the ACORN representatives that they recorded on video...release them!!! If you are right and have nothing to cover up or are not being biased in any way then release the tapes. You have nothing to lose by doing that. Release the original recordings of the tapes we have seen without gaps in the time-lines and without time-lines that are from 5 years ago. Release them!!! Let the public go through all the footage and make their own judgments about the pimp and his whore posing as journalists with an alarming amount of knowledge about prostitution, brothels and under age sex trafficking in soliciting advice on how to continue their criminal activity and commit conspiracy and the majority of responses (including the Philadelphia PD police report) from ACORN representatives. And last but not least, show who funded your country wide operation. If you have nothing to hidee than you have nothing to lose.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:03 PM (OX5qU)
7
>>"This pimp and his whore posing as journalists visited over 30 ACORN offices across the country on a witch hunt to find 3. Who funded this?"
Lipshits, you and all the other lefties are going crazy over this story. Or crazier, since you were already nuts.
ACORN is supporting chld sex slavery, and the question burning YOU up is "Who funded the people doing the investigation?"
I did not think the left could sink any lower in my estimation but somehow you always find a way to act even more disgusting.
>>"apparently in Baltimore, it's a felony to record individuals without their knowledge or consent."
Sorry, Lipshits, but it is not. However, thanks again for showing you main focus of interest in all this - getting those fucking reich-wing Rethuglikkkans!
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 06:09 PM (eORJj)
8
The Philadelphia ACORN office even called the police and reported their criminal activity and the police report is available online.
So, one out of (if we are to believe you) scores of ACORN offices bothered to report this to the police, while four of them (so far) went along with it.
And you, with your sick pedophiles brain, believe this makes ACORN look good!
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 06:13 PM (eORJj)
9
"Sure, I found more than half a dozen people who were happy to aid me in shipping in little girls for whores-- but that was only out of 20 locations!"
ACORN: WE'RE ONLY 20% IN SUPPORT
OF SELLING CHILDREN TO BE RAPED.
I can see the advertisement now....
Posted by: Foxfier at September 16, 2009 06:47 PM (OtIqW)
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 07:35 PM (OX5qU)
11
Foxfier...it was 3 locations buddy. Parents kept you home a lot so you wouldn't be indoctrinated into becoming a smart person? Here's hoping you at least wash your hands.
Steve...we don't believe this makes ACORN look good. This may come as quite a shock to you but the Left agree with you on this. If ACORN has people this stupid and incredibly irresponsible on their payroll then ACORN needs to clean their house and they should be cut off from federal funding until they do. I know you live in the delusional world of having one Leftie go crazy so well must go crazy similar to you all being a bunch of Mark Foleys and Larry Craigs right? Fabrication of one's own reality is a gift that just keeps on giving.
There have been a whopping 4 (that's FOUR) representatives fired out of hundreds of thousands of representatives, activists and volunteers affiliated with ACORN and all it's affiliates. FOUR!!! Not really something the left is going to hit the "self destruct" button on. Sorry. And this effects the housing division and not the other divisions so...congratulations? Yay? Ummmm...the activists are still there son.
If the pimp and his whore posing as journalists had actually filled out paperwork and allowed ACORN to process that paperwork with full knowledge of their criminal intent then ACORN would be implicated in criminal conspiracy activity which would have been legally damaging. Real journalists would have known to do that.
What we are being shown is a few minutes of footage with gaps in the time-line that "Woodward and Bernstein" were not smart enough to dump to the can without (it's quite easy to us smart folk) and we're not being shown the hours upon hours of footage that we now know exists. Hours upon hours of footage that shows the exact opposite of what we are being shown. Hours upon hours of footage who told the pimp and his whore posing as journalists that ACORN was not interested in engaging in their criminal activity that they had an alarming amount of knowledge in. Where is that footage?
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 08:08 PM (OX5qU)
12
>>"it was 3 locations buddy."
No, Lipshits, it was four. So far.
>>"What we are being shown is a few minutes of footage with gaps in the time-line"
No, Lipshits, you are lying again. The complete unedited tapes are avilable for you to see if you want.
>>"Hours upon hours of footage who told the pimp and his whore posing as journalists that ACORN was not interested in engaging in their criminal activity that they had an alarming amount of knowledge in. Where is that footage?"
It does not exist except in your sick, sick mind.
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 08:16 PM (eORJj)
13
>>"Steve...we don't believe this makes ACORN look good. This may come as quite a shock to you but the Left agree with you on this."
The left agrees with me? Is that why the left, in the form of you, is running around focusing its fire not on the kiddy sex slave fans in ACORN but on the people bringing this to light?
Or as you charmingly call them over and over again, "the pimp and his whore posing as journalists".
You don't give a crap about ACORN wrongdoing, Lipshits. What has you enraged is the people who caught them at it. You make that clear in comment after comment.
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 08:22 PM (eORJj)
14
Lipiwitz, you're a Discworld fan? (Their trolls have trouble counting to big numbers like "four", as well.)
Posted by: Foxfier at September 16, 2009 08:32 PM (OtIqW)
15
>>"If ACORN has people this stupid and incredibly irresponsible on their payroll then ACORN needs to clean their house and they should be cut off from federal funding until they do."
But why? According to all the lefty comments I'm seeing here, ACORN was the hapless victim of some pimp and his whore, and only some tiny percentage of them are dirty. That's what Lipshits keeps telling me. Why this need for a house cleaning? Just fire the four people and then prosecute the pimp and his whore. Right? That was the lefty line until an hour ago.
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 08:36 PM (eORJj)
16
There's a new video out. An ACORN guy is offering to help smuggle teenage girls across the border into America to act as sex slaves.
I'm sure he was just funnin' thoough. Those ACORN people have a whacky sense of humor.
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 09:22 PM (eORJj)
17
Steve Foxfier -- who gives a crap about ACORN? You do!!! 4 people got fired from an activist organization from the biased videos released from a pimp and his whore posing as journalists!
Look, did you actually read the Baucus bill released today in the health care reform? It's a freakin' Christmas gift to insurance companies. ACORN is not very high on the Left's "to do" list right now. It's your obsession, not ours.
Here's whats going to happen: ACORN has an independent investigation and audit being conducted over this. Once they clean up their house, they get their funding back. The activist wing of ACORN and all it's affiliates remains untouched so it has no political repercussions against the Left at all. In the end, the pimp and his whore posing as journalist got 4 people fired. Congratulations? They won't release all the tapes so ACORN's lawyers will get them eventually and as far as the trailer park Woodward and Bernstein? Well...it's all about following the money.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 17, 2009 12:50 AM (bhNGz)
18
Lipiwitz - If that Philadelphia police report is online as you claim, why haven't you linked it for every one's benefit?
Also, if these investigators visited 30 offices (your source please)but only got a few cooperators, why wasn't the bad conduct uncovered before the tapes were released and the people fired in advance? Hey, we're being set up by a hooker and pimp team, don't talk to them! The alibi doesn't make sense Bozo.
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 17, 2009 01:31 AM (3O5/e)
19
Lipiwitz: "Release all the tapes!"
According to Big Government, they have.
As of San Bernardino, they were batting 4-4, with every office they've touched being totally accepting of tax fraud and the trafficking of children for prostitution.
With Juan Carlos offering support in San Deigo (and apparently asking of the wanted a business partner so he could get his cut), they are (apparently) now batting a perfect 5-5.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at September 17, 2009 11:43 AM (gAi9Z)
20
Steve Foxfier -- who gives a crap about ACORN?
Clearly, you do, since you're having a melt down about it-- and just keep on lying.
Wait, you clearly have a problem with reality, since you haven't figured out yet that the woman was *posing* as a hooker. Odd, since you were able to figure out that the guy is a journalist... wonder why you can't get your brain around her being a journalist, as well?
Posted by: Foxfier at September 17, 2009 11:43 AM (OtIqW)
21
I find it fascinating that the liberals, who enforce their own brand of politically correct morality on the rest of us, give themselves and their international allies a pass.
The latest scandal -- ACORN "attorneys" offering to facilitate the infiltration of minors across our border for the purpose of sexual slavery -- is just the latest in a string of offenses that they countenance.
Look at the treatment of women and homosexuals by the taliban and al quaeda. It's OK, though, because "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". Liberals will never raise their voices to hold their jihadi friends accountable for their murderously sexist and anti-gay behavior.
Posted by: Jim at September 17, 2009 10:00 PM (+gRW7)
22
Some talking-head REALLY needs to segway this into an illegal immigration debate.
It's NOT about hating brown people. It's NOT even about the Mexican border. Many sex slaves are from Asia and come across the Canadian border.
I know it's been tried, the argument that terrorists are using the Mexican border to smuggle in terrorists. Thas true, but of course thas also nuthin the MSM or liberals(I repeat myself)cares about.
Stopping illegal immigration is about stopping slavery in our great nation.
Thas it and thas all. And don't call it 'human trafficking'. Thas the Liberal NewSpeak term for it. Call it what it is. Slavery.
Human Trafficking is when I take a bus or a plane. A human(me) is being Trafficked from one place to another.
Call the people who do this what they are. Not 'Human Traffickers'. They are Slavers.
Noun 1. slaver - a person engaged in slave trade
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/slaver
I live in Florida..Plenty o Hispanics. They get pissed off cause some bastards dinna go thru the proper channels to become citizens while they did. And just cause I live in Da South, it's not about white folks(I am one) gettin all pissy about all these brown people show up and 'dilute our national heritage' or any nonsense like that.
No, it's none of that. Regardless of race, I'm royally and righteously pissed off about this issue because of the sex trade. Doesn't matter if it's some El Salvadorian or a White Russian chick.
It's Wrong. And it must stop.
Posted by: Keapon Laffin at September 19, 2009 12:44 PM (r5iM0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 15, 2009
ACORN.Org Unplugged
http://www.acorn.org/index.php?id=7878 should go to the local home page of the ACORN San Bernardino, but as a simple click will attest, it doesn't work.
ACORN.org is experiencing "
Error 503 Service Unavailable," indicating that the server is overwhelmed.
Must be all those search requests for underage hookers with
husband-killing madams.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
05:53 PM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I've called the San Bernadino office and the chicago office (where I live) and oddly enough the numbers have been disconnected.
Posted by: Jason at September 15, 2009 08:38 PM (jGPO9)
2
The San Bernardino office page is working, you just have the wrong id. It's 13049 - I can't seem to post urls here.
Posted by: Joe Franks at September 15, 2009 09:40 PM (plnVV)
3
Schur said that Kaelke will sign an affidavit stating that she was not seriously entertaining the idea of cooperating with an apparent attempt to establish a house of prostitution.
Kaelke Affidavit
I Kaelke state under oath as follows:
1. I was not seriously entertaining to help open a house of prostitution for underaged hookers;
2. I thought I was participating in community theater;
3. What are you going to believe, your lying eyes and ears or this very official looking affidavit?
*signed*notarized*bonofied*hearts xxxooo
Kaelke
Posted by: Joe at September 15, 2009 10:33 PM (0Gde6)
Posted by: Jayne at September 15, 2009 11:04 PM (dwIL0)
5
Lipiwitz here!!!
Ummmmm....congratulations? Who gives a crap about ACORN.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:31 AM (bhNGz)
6
ACORN is your obsession, not ours.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:32 AM (bhNGz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
ACORN Worker in San Bernardino Video Admits to Homicide on Camera
From tax fraud in support of child prostitution to murder, Big Government's James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles are exposing ACORN as a criminal enterprise more and more every day.
Tell me, Madame Pelosi: Why should taxpayers still fund this organized criminal conspiracy?
Update: Good News for ACORN. The woman in the video, Tresa Kaelke, did not apparently murder any of her past husbands (though one has a restraining order against her).
She's just another ACORN employee in a long line that condones human trafficking for juvenile prostitution.
What a relief.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
05:00 PM
| Comments (46)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
From the language the ACORN worker uses, it sounds like she planned the murder and spread complaints of abuse beforehand in order to lay the ground for an alibi.
Posted by: pst314 at September 15, 2009 06:41 PM (XP0Bd)
2
There's no statute of limitations for murder, so maybe the local police will start investigating this Fine Upstanding Citizen.
Posted by: pst314 at September 15, 2009 06:41 PM (XP0Bd)
3
The woman in the video, Tresa Kaelke, has a restraining order against her by her current husband, Ronald Kaelke:
http://speakmymindblog.com/2009/...n-prostitution/
Posted by: anon at September 15, 2009 07:03 PM (j+QOS)
4
Hmm, where are the trolls? Must be still waiting to get the appropriate talking points on this emailed to them.
Posted by: Steve at September 15, 2009 10:15 PM (VwUP7)
5
Never fear, a troll is here with brand new, freshly minted talking points!!! YAAYYYY!!!!
The woman in the video has really nice boobs.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:28 AM (bhNGz)
6
That's not a talking point. They are kind of impressive but obviously this woman is not someone anybody would want to hook up with.
I don't know tho....impressive.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:29 AM (bhNGz)
7
"She's just another ACORN employee in a long line that condones human trafficking for juvenile prostitution."
Really? How many ACORN employees do you know of who have condoned human trafficking for juvenile prostitution? That's like saying all Republican Senators condone having sex in airport bathrooms because of Larry Craig. I guess logic isn't your strong suit. But hey, ACORN was going to take over the world or something so I guess the lie is justified.
Posted by: Dot at September 16, 2009 09:51 AM (A9OWD)
8
Dot, do you mean other than all of those employees that ACORN has already fired for precisely that reason?
I'm sure you wish it was a lie, but they were caught on camera going along with it, and ACORN canned them as a result.
Orwell sure got to you with the whole TRUTH = LIE thing, didn't he?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at September 16, 2009 09:55 AM (gAi9Z)
9
She's flying high - probably cocaine. Notice that she touches her nose quite a lot. Yes, kiddies, I didn't always go to church twice a day.
Posted by: Roy Lofquist at September 16, 2009 09:59 AM (Aa3wK)
10
All the other employees? How many exactly? And they were fired? Wow, that's really *condoning* the behavior. Or perhaps you don't know what condoning means?
Posted by: Dot at September 16, 2009 10:02 AM (A9OWD)
11
ACORN has terminated the employees in Baltimore that discussed how to commit fraud to cover child trafficking and prostitution, and did the same for its employees in Washington, DC.
ACORN's employees certainly condoned the practice in all four locations exposed thus far; that the national organization would fire them is almost automatic. They have no other choice as a simple matter of PR.
That ACORN employees have CONDONED international human trafficking for the purpose of juvenile prostitution is obvious for anyone who has watched the videos. ACORN employees, even after learning that they were talking to people who who participating in what the US DoJ defines as slavery, were willing to help commit fraud.
That you are going out of your way to try to obfuscate the self-evident truth shown right in front of your lying eyes merely goes to show that in your case, political ideology trumps basic human decency.
You are disgusting, Dot.
Be gone.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at September 16, 2009 10:17 AM (gAi9Z)
12
How is the report different from hearsay as it surely provides no evidence of anything that the woman is talking about?
By this logic every lawyer defending a person who is found guilty is also guilty.
Looks from the video that the woman is just blabbering on and you are like wow, we have got it on tape so its true
Posted by: Roshan at September 16, 2009 12:02 PM (l7z68)
13
>>"How is the report different from hearsay as it surely provides no evidence of anything that the woman is talking about?"
That's worst internet lawyering I've ever seen. You don't know how a confession is different from hearsay?
>>"Looks from the video that the woman is just blabbering on"
Well, yeah. An Acorn manager is "blabbering on" about how to engage in child sexual slavery and not get caught! Did you somehow miss that part?
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 06:00 PM (eORJj)
14
"TRUTH = LIE" This woman's spouses (current and ex) are still alive and kicking. Real journalists would have known to verify a "TRUTH" before broadcasting a "LIE".
Apparently the "TRUTH = LIE" murderer won't be terminated with "ALL THOSE ACORN REPRESENTATIVES" who have been fired. All 4 of them (wow what a huge and irreparable dent). 4 of them! I believe the country may slip into an apocalyptic nightmare of unimaginable proportions with the termination of "ALL (4) OF THOSE ACORN REPRESENTATIVES" who have been fired.
Quick...find Jesus! The world is coming to an end!!! 4 out of hundreds of thousands of representatives have been fired from ACORN. What do we do?!?!? WHAT DO WE DO?!?!?!?
Get lawyers. That's what we do.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:16 PM (OX5qU)
15
Still...you removed the video of the woman who was quite impressive. Since "LIE = TRUTH" in the right wing world, apparently this woman was quite safe to hook up with.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 06:19 PM (OX5qU)
16
>>"Apparently the "TRUTH = LIE" murderer won't be terminated with "ALL THOSE ACORN REPRESENTATIVES" who have been fired."
She will be. Your kooky moonbat friend is out.
>>""TRUTH = LIE" This woman's spouses (current and ex) are still alive and kicking."
And you, with yor sick pedophiles brain, think the person(s) to be blamed here is not the LIAR, but the persons who reported the lie!
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 06:26 PM (eORJj)
17
Someone calls you out for labelling acorn a criminal enterprise based on those shoddily put together exposes so you ban them and call them disgusting? You calling someone disgusting is like the pot calling the kettle black, except in that case you'd try to lynch the kettle.
Posted by: John at September 16, 2009 06:37 PM (RPIBb)
18
Steve...do you know what time she will be fired and more importantly, for what? Fooling a pimp and his whore posing as journalists by yanking their chain on a "murdered husband" joke is not something you tend to get fired for. Especially when the pimp and his whore posing as journalists were to stupid to verify the story or if they were the victim of a truly pathetic practical joke. We're not exactly dealing with Woodward and Bernstein here.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 16, 2009 07:39 PM (OX5qU)
19
>>"Someone calls you out for labelling acorn a criminal enterprise based on those shoddily put together exposes so you ban them and call them disgusting?"
Well, yeah. What do you call people who make excuses for child sex trafficing? Heros of The Progressive Revolution?
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 08:24 PM (eORJj)
20
>>"Fooling a pimp and his whore posing as journalists by yanking their chain"
Is that the story that came down from Troll Control for you losers to parrot? She was just goofing? And so was her friend across the street?
This is a hell of a way for you to make a buck, Lipshits. I'd respect you more if you were a regular whore.
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 08:28 PM (eORJj)
21
Who is making excuses Steve? You're making a mighty big assumption, just like you're in way over your head when you assume that this is evidence that acorn is a criminal organization. Those people should have fired and were. But the evidence can't be extrapolated to prove acorn is a criminal organization, which you and your ilk desperately want to be true. But I wouldn't expect you to understand nuance.
Posted by: John at September 16, 2009 10:16 PM (RPIBb)
22
>>"I wouldn't expect you to understand nuance."
Are you trying to parody the typical smug and arrogant lefty mindset? If so, nice job!
Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2009 11:32 PM (eORJj)
23
Steve:
Aren't you a clever one, coming up with a "when did you stop beating your wife?" style question. The sad thing is that all that proves is that you should be smart enough to realize the failure of logic in the original post, yet choose to ignore it which makes you simply a sad man repeating lies for partisan gain. Why do you hate the truth and America Steve?
Posted by: John at September 18, 2009 05:50 AM (RPIBb)
24
well said John..This is from a completely different Steve..
Posted by: steve at September 18, 2009 05:35 PM (cWCWG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BECK: "The Whole Thing is Coming Undone. Brace Yourselves."
BigGovernment.com, the Breitbart site that has revealed videotapes showing ACORN officials in three metropolitan areas attempting help commit fraud in support of child prostitution, is going to release another, even more damning video this afternoon, according to Andrea Shea King:
Glenn Beck just wrapped up what had to be the most compelling radio I've heard... and lately, most of his shows have been pretty compelling.
Whew, where to start? Well, how about this: you should make it a point to do two things today: watch his TV show at 5 ET this afternoon on Fox News, and hit the Big Government website an hour earlier at 4 ET.
Here's what you'll find - the latest video sting of ACORN. This one in a San Bernardino ACORN office where the employee can't talk fast enough about the connections they have to politicians (naming them by name) and even an admission of murder.
As I haven't seen the video yet I cannot say with certainly that what Andrea reports is accurate, but if it is, then Democrats in the House of Representatives are going to be hard-pressed to continue supporting a group that appears to be a Democratic Party-subsidized criminal conspiracy.
I don't normally watch Beck, but the DVR is going to be set for this one. This could get... interesting.
Update: Confirmed.
Update: Hannah Giles:
The Science behind the ACORN Sting.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:03 PM
| Comments (33)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
OK, so can we now get an investigation into this criminal organization, or is that too much to ask of Barry & Company?
Posted by: Thomas at September 15, 2009 02:30 PM (gxlpn)
2
While the schadenfreude may taste delicious, I can't help but wonder if this is good for the country.
However, while I wish that our elected officials, our government departments, and national charitable organizations weren't all filled with corruption, it seems they are, so perhaps the best thing is to bring it all out into the light of day, and get all the pus out so that the wound can heal. Rather like that disgusting giant zit video that's making the rounds these days.
Posted by: Stoutcat at September 15, 2009 02:31 PM (kKdtK)
3
Stoutcat, how can exposing taxpayer-funded criminal behavior NOT be "good for the country?"
Posted by: swami at September 15, 2009 02:52 PM (na0wJ)
4
Holder? Holder? Eric Holder? Anyone seen US Attorney General Eric Holder? He appears to be MIA.
Posted by: GarandFan at September 15, 2009 02:54 PM (ZQBnQ)
5
So will this mean the rest of the media has to finally acknowledge that this is going on? I mean, if someone is naming names, you'd think that'd have to be reported...right?? (Yes, yes, I know: it's just another isolated incident, just one more bad apple, right trolls?)
Posted by: ECM at September 15, 2009 03:15 PM (q3V+C)
6
Swami, only in the sense that all this upheaval and disturbance isn't good. I know it's got to be dug out, so to speak, but it's going to hurt. The fact that it'll eventually get better seems rarther remote at this point, is all I'm sayin'.
Posted by: Stoutcat at September 15, 2009 03:18 PM (kKdtK)
7
I'm sure Holder will get right on this after he finishes the New Black Panther voter intimidation case.
-Bri
Posted by: Bri at September 15, 2009 03:39 PM (ykOvo)
8
um... where is it? i'm reloading big government, but nothing new.... AUUGGH.
Posted by: jdub at September 15, 2009 04:05 PM (t9pKb)
Posted by: Mark Harvey at September 15, 2009 04:28 PM (cs181)
10
Andrew Breitbart set up extremely high expectations for this one. But the woman seems nuts. Yes, it's more confirmation that Acorn's corruption is part of its organizational DMA. But Andrew needs to remember the Steve Jobs mo of underpromise/overdeliver.
Posted by: Mr. Mahketing at September 15, 2009 06:00 PM (Jh0om)
11
" IS THIS GOOD FOR THE COUNTRY???" GOOD GAWD..EXPOSING ACORN AND THEIR TAX FRAUD, ETC...AT OUR EXPSENSE...(OBAMA MADE IT CLEAR HE TAKES ADVICE FROM THEM AND SUPPORTS THEM TO THE TUNE OF WANTING TO FUND THEM IN THE BILLIONS WITH TAX PAYER DOLLARS) WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?
HOW LONG DO YOU SUGGEST WE WAIT TO EXPOSE ACORN? HOW LONG DO WE WAIT TILL THESE CRIMINALS ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE? HOW LONG DO WE WAIT TILL ITS " GOOD " FOR OUR COUNTRY TO EXPOSE IT ALL? HOW LONG WILL YOU WAIT TILL YOU SEE HOW OBAMA IS IN BED WITH ACORN? DON'T THINK SO? READ...ITS ALL RIGHT THERE IN HIS WORDS..AND ACORNS...OR IS THAT NOT GOOD FOR THE LA LA LAND YOU LIVE IN?
Posted by: BABS at September 15, 2009 06:40 PM (gxlpn)
12
Glenn, you are doing a great job. I love my country and I have written to Richard Shelby of Alabama about checking out Acorn and all the crooks in Washington. Prayer goes a long way according to the book of 2nd Chronicles 7:14 I says "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from HEAVEN, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." In God we trust is on our money and this country was founded on Godly principles. So I ask where are people in government now? Where is the churches and why are they not speaking out on this. Keep up the good work Glenn it's working. Brenda
Posted by: brenda at September 15, 2009 07:09 PM (lc9S0)
13
Dude? Lipiwitz? No comment?
Posted by: Jayne at September 15, 2009 11:06 PM (dwIL0)
14
If these events/actions have done no more than impede the ACORN pollution of the census it is the greatest service a pair of civilians have done for this nation in many a long day, and of course the impact on ACORN is far beyond that. This crapulent hive of moronic evil was built up by the Barack Obamas of this world to serve as their henchmen, thugs and fixers. Looks like Barry will have to start from scratch and this time under national scrutiny. Remember though that these freaks are never defeated, only routed for the day. And these particular freaks are not yet well-routed. When will some one with a press pass ask The One about this organization that he was so intimately involved with and that he has pimped with billions of our dollars? Anyone? Bueller?
Posted by: megapotamus at September 15, 2009 11:46 PM (/s1pv)
15
Babs, no need to shout, I can hear you perfectly well.
As I said upthread, "I know it's got to be dug out, so to speak, but it's going to hurt. The fact that it'll eventually get better seems rarther remote at this point, is all I'm sayin'." In no way did I either suggest or condone inaction. My comment was akin to the "I don't want to have a root canal because I know it'll hurt like hell, but I know I need it," that's all.
Posted by: Stoutcat at September 16, 2009 10:23 AM (kKdtK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 83 >>
Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.2257 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.2042 seconds, 245 records returned.
Page size 187 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.