Confederate Yankee
November 28, 2010
The Post-Muslim Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama
A recent article in the Arab News (available here), linked at the fine PowerLine blog (available here) on November 26 has, once again, raised an interesting and persistent question: Is Barack Hussein Obama, the President of the United States, a Muslim? The article quotes Obama’s paternal grandmother, 88 year old Haja Sarah Omar as saying “I prayed for my grandson Barack to convert to Islam.” Omar was interviewed in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia while on the Haj, the journey all observant Muslims are expected to perform once in their lives to Mecca, the most holy city of Islam.
John Hinderaker of PowerLine was not impressed. “President Obama is NOT a Muslim, whatever else he may be. But he needs this kind of story [linked to the Arab News story] like a hole in the head.” Hinderaker concluded his post: “ In principle, the fact that a substantial part of Obama's family is Muslim is neither here nor there. If Obama were a successful President, no one would care. But given that many millions of Americans view him as a kind of alien presence as a result of the policies he has tried to impose, Obama must wish his Kenyan relatives would fade quietly away for the balance of his term in office.”
Posted by: MikeM at
11:52 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
She went on the Haj? Last I heard, she had no visible means of support other than public assistance.
Illegal aliens must get some pretty generous assistance.
Posted by: Professor Hale at November 29, 2010 08:21 AM (FJTpO)
2
It's his AUNT who is on public assistance. The grandmother still lives in Africa.
Posted by: Spinnerella-1 at November 29, 2010 12:59 PM (sc3Bn)
3
I wasn't aware that Frank Davis had a muslum mother.
Posted by: ck at November 29, 2010 04:07 PM (T7cdX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NPR, or the Onion?
Taxpayers should not be subsidizing NPR's second-rate liberal commentary or slanted news... we have for-profit corporations for that.
Neither should we be paying for absurd satire... and
I sure hope this was satire.
The president played basketball yesterday with some friends in the gym of the Fort McNair Army Base, and reportedly took an elbow in the mouth from an opposing player who went up for a shot.
It took 12 stitches to close The First Fat Lip, if you please. I'm not sure that Joe Frazier needed 12 stitches after the Thrilla in Manila, though the White House stressed that a smaller filament was used, which increases the number of stitches, but leaves a smaller scar.
I wonder if having a larger scar wouldn't actually fortify President Obama's profile, as he contends with Kim Jong Il, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Vladimir Putin. Imagine a president with a gnarly, vivid scar telling the rulers of China, "Nice country ya' got here. I'd hate to see something happen to it if you didn't stop foolin' around with the value of your currency. Know what I mean?"
The problem is that in politics or in basketball Obama is a comically overrated amateur, and that never intimidates anyone.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:24 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
POW! Right in his socialist-spouting unAmerican kisser! Give that elbow a medal.
Posted by: twolaneflash at November 28, 2010 02:10 PM (xb4TD)
2
Did the guy have razorwire wrapped around his arm?! Who the hell needs stitches for a fat lip via misplaced elbow?!
Posted by: ECM at November 28, 2010 04:30 PM (nYKDd)
3
Bambi doesn't need a scar to be taken seriously, he needs a pair.
Posted by: Bohemond at November 28, 2010 05:21 PM (krvSm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 26, 2010
Something I'm Thankful For
I was on the road or at relative's homes yesterday soaking up good food and conversation, and didn't quite manage to get up a Thanksgiving post.
Had I been able to find the time to get online, I would have told you--and will tell you now--just how fortunate I am to have two so very talented, intelligent and
fun co-bloggers here at CY, not to mention all the wonderful readers that continue to frequent the site.
You are all very much a blessing in my life, and I am continually thankful for your company.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:10 PM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Your most welcome.
CW Johns
Son of the Confederacy
Posted by: capt26thga at November 27, 2010 12:04 AM (U+HI8)
2
You too. I'm still thinking about your comment the other night when we were having the discourse online on the uh. . . bustier holster idea.
"We have advanced degrees and we're like 8 year olds". But ofo course. Growing old is mandatory, growing up, not so much. Thanks for the friendship and the fun, guys.
Posted by: Brigid at November 27, 2010 03:01 PM (yKDjw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
I've got a Bad Feeling About This...
Han Solo must have been an East Carolina football fan.
My alma mater of ECU is up against Southern Methodist today in a CUSA game. Both enter with identical records 6-5 (5-2 CUSA), but there the similarities end.
The defending CUSA champion Pirates under first-year head coach Ruffin McNeal have been dazzling at times, with a high-octane offense that is capable of putting up astronomical numbers. Unfortunately, they've also been cursed with a young and undersized defense that is giving up the kind of points normally seen in basketball games, including a humiliating 62 points given up against a sub-par Rice team last week.
SMU, however, is a team on the rise,
hoping to contend for their first CUSA championship
local sports reporters is picking SMU, 56-42.
I'm not into
sports betting (primarily because I stink at that and just about every other form of gambling) but if I was putting money on the game, I'd have to give the game to SMU by a touchdown or more.
I'd really love to munch Thanksgiving leftovers while watching my Pirates win, but I don't think it's in the cards in their regular season finale.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:58 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
A few years ago I went to a football game between USMA (West Point) and -- I'm pretty sure -- ECU at West Point.
Before the game the ECU team all took a knee, on the field, for a short prayer, and the poor Army Cadets had to stand around staring at the laces on their cleats.
Posted by: Bill Smith at November 26, 2010 02:11 PM (pdFrC)
2
Sigh. Another bad loss for the Pirates
Posted by: William Teach at November 27, 2010 07:45 PM (7yTel)
3
Sorry to hear your team didn't win. On Friday I chanced to freeze my butt off, but it was worth it watching my alma mater Nevada come from behind to beat a much over rated BSU team.
Posted by: Todd N at November 29, 2010 05:18 PM (tep6g)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 24, 2010
The Erik Scott Case: Update 8.2: Training, Corruption, Confusion and (More) Coincidence
A press release on the business relationship between the Metro Police and Las Vegas Valley Locking Systems (LVVLS) can be found here.
On Thursday, November 13, Phillip Ransom of Kansas City ran out of luck. His old van, the van he drove every day in his janitorial business, broke down with a series of backfires, just before 6 PM, about a block from his home. But his luck quickly became worse. Someone called the Kansas City Police and reported hearing shots. Worried about his old van catching on fire, Ransom stepped out at about the time two officers arrived and immediately opened fire, shooting repeatedly at Ransom and the van. Ransom stood by the van, his empty hands up, shouting that he wasn’t shooting. “I guess they couldn’t hear me,” he said. Ransom didn’t know how many rounds were fired: “I wasn’t counting, but it sounded like a lot.” When the smoke finally cleared, Ransom and the officers were unharmed, but Ransom’s van was hit at least three times, and the officers also shot out several windows of their patrol car. The local media story of this incident can be found
here.
Posted by: MikeM at
01:28 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Just exactly what part of "...preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution..." does "Law Enforcement" not comprehend? As I have said before, the Mafia enforcers either obeyed their oath or they were gone. Permanently. If you paid your "insurance", you were protected. And if those who were SUPPOSED to protect you did not do so...
The stench is overwhelming. The ENTIRE MLVPD needs to be gone. Now. And not after waiting for a rigged trial where at worst the taxpayers will shell out a bundle of money.
Filthy. Maggot. Pigs.
Posted by: Mark Matis at November 24, 2010 06:15 PM (LzG0h)
2
Thank you Mike for a very well written and insightful essay. Thank you for following this case. I pray that the truth will come out speedily on this matter. It is very likely that some, or several, of those who actually know what happened will finally speak the truth when put under oath. May Almighty God be their Shield and Protector and give them the courage to do what is right.
Posted by: DisabledVeteran at November 25, 2010 01:11 AM (sAhB7)
3
Happy Thanksgiving,
I wish Mike M and everyone here a wonderful holiday, that goes for you too Federale. Thanks, once again for your great updates. Always looking forward to what's next.
Posted by: Jvh at November 25, 2010 04:56 AM (DKv/6)
4
Mark Matis:
How do you know the civil trial will be "rigged", and by whom? (Goodman?) Since you seem to be skilled into seeing the future, will the Officers involved receive 'qualified immunity'? And does not Nevada enjoy some kind of tort immunity or limitations, like most states?
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at November 25, 2010 01:51 PM (Fw0L3)
5
Keep on suckin', Buck! The stench of pig is overwhelming.
Posted by: Mark Matis at November 28, 2010 11:35 PM (LzG0h)
6
And a bad shooting in a jurisdiction hundreds of miles away from Las Vegas makes the LVMPD officers guilty? That is a stretch.
Posted by: Federale at November 29, 2010 03:26 PM (JS6HU)
7
Federale:
Don't you get it, it's one of them there collusion things or maybe even a double secret probation issue or at least a cryptic code buried in mystery.
But, whatever it is, I assure you prophet Mark would know as he can see it from his house.
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at November 29, 2010 05:48 PM (Fw0L3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Goldberg (Dull) File
Whoopi Goldberg, she of the manufactured pseudo-righteous outrage at Bill O’Reilly’s entirely factual assertion that Muslims attacked America on 9-11, appeared on the O’Reilly Factor on Fox on November 23rd. While Goldberg might be accorded some degree of acknowledgement for merely appearing on O’Reilly’s show, she revealed, in convenient capsule form, much that is wrong with the contemporary left.
Goldberg’s argument seemed to be that when O’Reilly said that America was attacked by Muslims--an incontestable fact--he was actually saying that all Muslims attacked America and that all Muslims want to attack America and that all Muslims are bad, hate adorable puppies (wait, they do hate adorable puppies)...or something like that. She also took exception with the assertion that the Japanese attacked America at Pearl Harbor (yes, she actually did).
Posted by: MikeM at
02:55 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I guess under the guise of those premises there was no WWII and we didn't drop nuke's on Hiroshima and Nagasaki either.
Posted by: ron at November 24, 2010 12:40 PM (zSURW)
2
whoopie is a stage one thinker who probably doesnt even see the box she's trapped herself in with her failed logic.
Posted by: rumcrook at November 24, 2010 01:05 PM (60WiD)
3
Liberals are amazing aren't they? You say something truthful and they jump all over you because the truth offends their tender sensibilities.
Posted by: mike w. at November 24, 2010 04:14 PM (btxkq)
4
Standing on street corners begging for money, which Ms. Goldberg did for much of her early life while trying to become an actress, doesn't leave much time for study or research. She obviously hasn't learned much over the course of her life.
If you feel that I'm being cruel, think about it. There are always some jobs for those who are willing to do honest work.
Marianne Matthews
Posted by: Marianne Matthews at November 24, 2010 04:59 PM (Aaj8s)
5
Wow! She's one smart cookie, eh?
Feewings, nothing more than feewings.
Posted by: maxx at November 24, 2010 09:21 PM (bFNvP)
6
for the left being offended is more important than whether it is true
and that is the bottom line.
Posted by: rumcrook at November 25, 2010 11:25 AM (60WiD)
7
In any other country in the world she would still be begging on corners or mucking out portable toilets.
Posted by: emdfl at November 25, 2010 03:36 PM (zI7uq)
8
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, Whoopi.
Posted by: Murgatroyd at November 25, 2010 05:30 PM (Cm09w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 23, 2010
Great Moments In Marital Bliss #257
Yesterday while in the checkout line at a local sporting goods/gun store, my wife, observing the purchases of others, turned to me and said, "Don't ever buy me a pink gun case...or a pink gun."
Yes Dear.
Posted by: MikeM at
06:15 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Your wife - my wife. Interchangeable parts. In theory, not in practice.
Posted by: ViolentIndifference at November 23, 2010 09:36 PM (IE6OB)
2
What, she wouldn't LOVE one of these? Heck, I think I want one and I'm a middle aged man.
Posted by: Pablo at November 24, 2010 12:39 PM (1fuCG)
3
Well, she's correct. Besides, she's also SWMBO.
(She Who Must Be Obeyed)
Learn it - Live it - Love it.
Posted by: Charles at November 24, 2010 05:45 PM (UpH0L)
4
"Yes, Dear."
"I love you."
The only 5 words any man really needs.
Posted by: Stretch at November 24, 2010 07:31 PM (0D7oJ)
5
Stretch:
Yup, but there are 3 more that are crucial to survival:
I was wrong.
Posted by: Bill Smith at November 24, 2010 09:47 PM (QfTFI)
6
My Dad has was married over 63 years to two wonderful women he outlived. When asked as to the secret of two marriages, each lasting decades, each very happy, he said "It's simple. We never went to bed angry. We would stay up, talking rationally, until each of us realized I was wrong.".
Pink guns are just WRONG though. I want a XD in .45 in the olive and stainless but so far Santa isn't answering his mail.
Posted by: Brigid at November 25, 2010 10:19 AM (NhXQi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 22, 2010
Gun Control Advocate to Head BATF
Barack Obama has been shy of acting on his radical anti-gun tendencies since he jumped on the campaign trail, but he has found someone with a similar agenda to run the BATF. Read about the nightmare that is Andrew Traver in my latest post at Pajamas Media.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:15 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Where does it end??? Do they not get the clue from the elections? Or do they just not care???
Posted by: Old NFO at November 22, 2010 03:25 PM (kCq7A)
2
I believe they do not care. They'll let this guy initiate regulations to damage our RKBA, and take the heat for it as well. I've been waiting for this president to show himself on this issue. I think he just has.
Posted by: Jim at November 22, 2010 04:12 PM (CWJ0q)
3
Perhaps this is just a distraction so that we will not pay attention to the economy. Remember, do not look at the man behind the curtain. Until the sheeple respond (never?) nothing will change significantly.
Posted by: 2knives at November 23, 2010 08:59 AM (Eghs8)
4
If you can't do it with legislation, do it with regulation. Once signed into "law", anything they do will take years to get to SCOTUS and be nullified-if ever. Look for the sheer bulk of unconstitutional idiocy coming out of BATFE to be mind-boggling.
Posted by: 1911A1 at November 24, 2010 09:31 PM (qqA+Z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 21, 2010
Me? Own A Gun? Article 2: Is Killing Justified?
The first article of this series ended with this paragraph:
“But let us assume that this article has, at least, persuaded you to the point that you are willing to tentatively concede that an individual, inalienable right of self defense is probably necessary. What then? The next installment of the series explores the legal, moral and spiritual issues revolving around taking the life of another, legally and illegally.”
Posted by: MikeM at
11:13 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
You mentioned Ghandi, so I thought a quote attributed to him is appropriate:
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest."
And from a fictional character:
"The one thing there's no shortage of in this world is people. If some of them can't behave themselves we're better off without them."
Matt Helm
Of course, one of the religious reasons to oppose capital punishment that you didn't touch on is the belief that the sinner should be given every opportunity to reconcile themselves with God. Allow them the maximum time to find God and repent, assuming they can be kept safely behind bars.
Posted by: strygwillidar at November 22, 2010 01:48 PM (FzhYM)
2
The ol' pensylvania pennitentiaries come to mind...Where virtually every prisoner was locked in solitary confinement for the duration of their sentence and given no human interaction but a bible to read. They came out sane and saved or went stark raving mad.
Which is what it take to be a criminal to begin with. Stark raving mad.
Every one know what Mark Twain said. "An armed society is a peacful society".
Posted by: ron at November 22, 2010 05:42 PM (ujvDt)
3
http://www.someworthwhilequotes.com/GUNCONTROLGUNS.html
Just for the record, the phrase was not from Mark Twain as far as I can tell. Above link indicates the quote "An armed society is a peaceful society" was a Colt marketing slogan in the 18th century.
I was more familiar with Robert Heinlin's modification of it to, "An armed society is a POLITE society. (caps just to show change)
Posted by: styrgwillidar at November 23, 2010 01:01 PM (xGZ+b)
4
Yeah I just pulled that out of my memory from something a relative told me once and I think I read it somewhere too. Still the saying goes if you ask me. Supported by comparisons between cities that outlawed guns and those that require them. Also something I heard back in the early 90's listening to ElRusbo.
I'll be a visiting wikipedia in a sec.
Posted by: ron at November 23, 2010 03:38 PM (0GbMN)
5
Huh! Wikipedia attributes the quote to: Robert A. Heinlein wrote "An armed society is a polite society".
I swear that I heard or read that Mark Twain said; that "an armed societ is a peacful society".
Posted by: ron at November 23, 2010 03:46 PM (0GbMN)
6
O loved this article. you mirrored my belief on the whole subject of self defense.
here is a perfect example of righteous killing.
http://rumcrook.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/a-real-man-and-how-he-met-his-end/
Posted by: rumcrook at November 24, 2010 03:03 AM (60WiD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 20, 2010
The Outcome Is...Trying
Eric Holder and Barack Obama are, in many ways, alike. Men of few actual accomplishments but unlimited, astronomical self-regard, they have been elevated far past their abilities, living examples of the Peter Principle, people rising to and greatly surpassing their own level of incompetence. Despite having little prosecutorial experience and having less experience in management, Mr. Holder was elevated to the office of the Attorney General, apparently on the strength of his slavish devotion to leftist philosophy.
Posted by: MikeM at
11:27 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Why would ANYONE think that the outcome of the Ghailani trial was anything less than what Mr. Holder and Mr. Obama desired? Of course, they probably would have preferred that he be acquitted of ALL charges, but this was close enough for government work.
Posted by: Mark Matis at November 21, 2010 07:49 AM (eukyi)
2
I watched the Medal of Honor award ceremony and, unbidden, the thought arose that if ever there was a president unqualified to participate as commander-in-chief, it was this clown. I know ... speaking as a Canuck, I shouldn't malign the leader of the free world but it is precisely that "part-time" job of his that gives me the right to comment. Never forget that if he screws up, it will be more than Americans who have to duck the falling rubble.
You have our sympathy but keep in mind we can't do anything about him. Only you can ... and 2012 is the time.
As for Holder ... again our sympathies for that person.
Regards.
Posted by: George Smith at November 21, 2010 03:29 PM (bv1hq)
Posted by: buy wildfox sale at December 11, 2010 07:24 PM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Anybody Watching the Fights Tonight?
So I let it slip during the dog days of July that I am an avid mixed marital arts fan. There are few individual sports that require as much technical proficiency, raw power, and heart as this modern combat sport, which has evolved to be the domain of an incredible new breed of hybrid fighter.
Unlike the early days of MMA when pure practitioners of various martial arts stepped into the cage with the mastery of one style, today's athletes cross-train as wrestlers, Brazilian jujitsu submission artists, kick-boxers, and brawlers.
That is part of what makes tonight's UFC fight between Quinton "Rampage" Jackson and Lyoto "The Dragon" Machida interesting to me.
Rampage is a hotheaded brawler with a wrestling background that tends to be best on his feet, but who has decent submission defense. He's powerful and emotional and simply pours it out in an a rush, but isn't a technician, despite his championship belts. He's just a tough son-of-a-gun, without much quit in him, who prefers to push forward. Detroit seems to be
pulling for him, as well, making this a"hometown" fight for him, of sorts.
Machida, on the other hand is one of the more disciplined martial artists in modern MMA, using Brazilian jujitsu, Shotokan karate, and even Sumo in an elusive, counter-punching style.
Those of you interested in
sports gambling are going to have a tough choice to make tonight as Rampage and The Dragon face off.
My pick? I'm guessing Machida on points in a unanimous decision after three rounds, with Machida not really hurting Jackson but frustrating him as he points his way to a win.
UFC 123's other big fight is the rubber match between legends BJ Penn and Matt Hughes. I'd like ot talk this up, but I can't. Penn is slower and less flexible and doesn't seem to have the heart he used to, while Hughes is recharged and evolving.
Hughes by submission early in round 2.
Update: Penn destroyed Hughes in seconds, and Rampage outpointed Machida to a split decision. Did I mention that the unpredictability of the sport is another thing that fascinates me?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:24 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
New Co-Blogger Coming Soon
Fair warning, folks: we have a lady in the house, or at least we will soon. She'll introduce herself when she's ready (and after I get her account set up). I think you'll be very impressed with her, just as you were when Mike joined up.
Best,
Bob
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:20 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Looking forward to more great blogging!
Tarheel Repub Out!
Posted by: Tarheel Repub at November 20, 2010 10:13 AM (OQEcO)
Posted by: Larry at November 21, 2010 03:20 AM (7Y12r)
3
Outstanding choice. Brigid is a damn fine writer.
Posted by: Six at November 21, 2010 10:15 AM (8kQ8M)
Posted by: get faith at December 11, 2010 07:54 AM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 19, 2010
Heavy Metal Moves to the 'Stan
There is a steady escalation of force occurring in Afghanistan, though it seems few in this country realize the pressure being brought to bear. The volume of precision air-delivered munitions has been steadily increasing. The Army has now brought in a handful of futuristic XM25 25mm grenade launchers for field (combat) testing, and if they perform as well as hoped, additional XM25s are assured for wider deployment. On top of that, the Army is introducing a company of M1 Abrams main battle tanks to the conflict for the first time in the nice-year war, with the goal of using the 120mm main gun to crack open Taliban safe houses and fighting positions.
The Abrams will likely excel in Afghanistan as it has in the other environments in which it has been used, but the mil-geek in me wonders if the Stryker-variants armed with 120mm mortars (which have seen use in Iraq, but I don't know about Afghanistan) or the 105mm Mobile Gun variant (still in testing?) wouldn't be a better option for many Afghan missions because of their relative stealth and mobility advantages.
In any event, it appears the Taliban are in for a vicious fight.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:52 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
What's typical here is the NIH mindset of the US military. There are several wheeled 120mm motor-gun vehicles on the market. These would be far better in that environment. Heck pick up the Finish version that has TWO guns in the turrent. As well, precision munitions are available for the guns in that caliber.
Posted by: emdfl at November 19, 2010 10:28 AM (QweUF)
2
I seem to recall Soviet tanks being sitting ducks back in the day. I hope they're not planning on using them in the countryside.
Posted by: Kevin at November 19, 2010 10:49 AM (1sB4u)
3
Two things:
1-it's the Marines, not the Army.
2-the Canadians have had tanks in Afghanistan for years. To the best of my knowledge, they haven't lost any.
120mm cannons are very useful for making holes in meter-thick adobe walls.
HL
CJTF-82 Staff
2009-2010
Posted by: Heartless Libertarian at November 19, 2010 12:35 PM (Asur/)
4
With no offense intended to emdfl,
Bwahahahahah
gimme the main gun!!!
Posted by: Gus Bailey at November 19, 2010 01:19 PM (B5Wgp)
5
I love it....We got the stick....And I am all for pounding the bleep out of them where ever we find them...Soviet tanks of that era were ill prepared and the Soviets combat strategies were far less flexible than ours are....Our commanders will likely not be so stupid as to use them in mountains so much but there is a huge plain area were tanks are far better suited where there is much fighting. If they did decide to use them in the mountains the M1 which is hugely well armored would be the best possible weapon to bring to bear....
If they've decided to bring the mortar version of the stryker into play.....it is or will see less use I am thinking.... It's mobility and design is for plasticized battle fronts mainly. It's ability to bring indirect firepower accurately and instantly is awesome. I do love that my fellow Finns have built what may be the best of these mobile mortars systems in the world and I hate it that we have opted to purchase some foreign design for mobile infantry but never the less the stryker 120 mobile mortar system is an excellent build.
I love the idea of the 105 mobile gun system but my main problem with it; the armor on it makes it less survivable in my opinion than the Abrams, especially in this asymmetric war we are currently fighting. It is best suited for mobile infantry on the attack and less suited for occupational duties. The Abrams because of it's speed, maneuverability, firepower, and armor second to none, is more versatile. In this case I see an excellent use for forward basing the 105 mobile gun system in the mountainous regions, where the superior optics and targeting make it an excellent; I think, weapon for counter fire against the harrassing attacks favored by the gueralla's, which are almost always using line of sight fighting tactics....
Almost always in guerrilla warfare the enemy in the field gets off the first shot. To win those fights you must be able to absorb the first blow and return a fire so punishing as to make it nearly completely nearly completely disadvangageous to attack.
I would like to see drones available for every single patrol that goes out to help keep an eye on their flanks... ambushing ambushers is the best defense against ambushes. I like the ramp up in interdictive drone strikes....It's about time.... Be cool to see 24/7 layered predator and super predator flights covering one hundred percent of the Afghany border. No compromise I game in my head will do.
In the case of a people who are bent on suicide like Muslim mujaheddin surviving an initial attack and then killing them off in the counter response is key to winning victory. It demoralizes them and shows them that God is not on their side. They will quit when they realize that for the time being either tactically; or in the case I am referring to strategically, to put off for another day the fight against us infidels is God's will.
In fact they may be beginning to realize that a direct military invasion of the US is the only solution to their problems... By their Koran the only proper use of Jihad. Direct frontal assault of the strongholds of the infidels. That be us; the United States of America. Fortunately for you and me they don't have the logistical transport and support system to do that with but I know that will change.
Posted by: ron at November 19, 2010 01:43 PM (B6p2N)
6
Nothing else, absolutely nothing else, says, "Don't f*** with me." as well.
Posted by: Mike at November 19, 2010 02:39 PM (rjoFk)
Posted by: wildfox sale at December 11, 2010 07:20 PM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 18, 2010
Advice
Brigid is really good at it, or really bad at it, depending on your point of view.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:41 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I don't care if she's good or bad, it's all the same to me. If she wanted to tell knock-knock jokes and needed a foil (or is that fool") I would ask "who's there" as long as necessary.
Posted by: tjbbpgobIII at November 19, 2010 04:21 AM (eXdIs)
Posted by: rebel yell cut off top at December 10, 2010 03:46 PM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 17, 2010
Profiteering from the Sheep
Joshua Rhett Miller has made a rather disgusting display of bad journalism on FoxNews.com today, in an article about the TSA's invasive news passenger screening program that either irradiates passengers or results in their sexual assault by TSA employees.
In an apparent effort to buttress the TSA position, Miller goes to Carie Lemack and Mary and Frank Fetchet for their opinions. None of the three are air security professionals, bomb techs or terrorism experts. Their only uniting thread is that they had relatives killed as passengers on planes on 9/11.
This is nothing more or less than a false appeal to authority, as if traumatic loss granted security expertise or insights. The Fetchets and LeMack have no special knowledge. Their opinions are no more relevant to a discussion of air security than is a Kalahari bushman's.
We're plagued by incompetence in Homeland Security, and journalists like Miller are clouding the issue by asking the unqualified for advice.
Neither the millimeter-wave or backscatter X-ray technologies increase security for air passengers, anymore than does taking off your shoes, surrendering corkscrews or nail files, or reducing the size of your mouthwash bottles. All of these are gimmicks developed to give the impression that authorities are making us safer, even as the real gaping holes in air security remain as wide-open as they always have been.
Anyone could walk through the most advanced millimeter-wave or backscatter X-ray machines on the market with enough explosives to down an airliner. This isn't up for debate. It is an unassailable fact.
Homeland Security is spending hundreds of millions of dollars because Janet Napolitano likes to pretend she is worth her salary, while former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
turns a tidy profit from the machines themselves. It isn't about your safety. It's about profiting from your fear, and with something around 80% buying the government's claims, it appears they are succeeding.
Baa. Baa. Baa.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
05:07 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
My opinion has always been: If you are afraid don't do it. We don't really need all this appearance of protection. This is about stealing more from the citizens again. This is about control. American do not do control very well. It shall not last.The shall stop it or be forced to stop. The old Romans knew very well; the will of the mob rules. Do anything but anger the mob. It is its own beast and will not be tamed.
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at November 17, 2010 06:33 PM (brIiu)
2
An excellent post! There is a model of successful airport security that has been functioning extremely well for years: Israel. The US has no real security in place. The Homeland Security is worse than useless, and the attacks that have been foiled have been due to ordinary citizens. I agree with you 100%.
Posted by: Texana at November 17, 2010 08:07 PM (COh1I)
3
The next time I fly - which is an incredibly rare event - I'll wear gold lamé boxers. I wonder what that will do to their pictures.
Posted by: MikeM_inMd at November 17, 2010 11:22 PM (6hI0A)
4
Yeah, and I suspect that all those loud-mouthed "spokepersons/clowns" who went through that oh so friendly little pat-down in their offices would be singing a different tune if they had been groped in the airport where nobody knew who they were.
Posted by: emdfl at November 17, 2010 11:30 PM (zeg6p)
5
"I'll wear gold lamé boxers. I wonder what that will do to their pictures."
Nothing, they just crank up the power to where they can see right through them.
And pull you out of line for a cavity search after of course.
========================
The biggest security risk isn't passengers, never has been passengers.
It's airport workers, staff in duty free stores, ground crew, luggage handlers.
Those people don't undergo any screening before entering secure areas apart from a cursory ID check (if that, more often it's an automated door you can walk through with any number of people if only one has a pass card).
And many airports have gaping holes in their perimeter security, holes that are well known to those living in the area.
I live near a major European airport (and security here has always been tighter than in the US), where friends have found ways to walk onto the ramp to take pictures of parked aircraft and inside hangars post-9/11.
These friends were aviation enthousiasts who sent those pictures to airport authorities as proof of the major breaches in their perimeter, and action may have been taken to correct those gaps (I never checked).
But there are still regular stories about problems with airport perimeter security, people getting access passes who should never have had them, reporters planting hidden cameras and fake bombs on airport property using stolen or borrowed pass cards, things like that.
And I've seen first hand how lax the security checks of airport workers are. If the weather is bad (cold or rainy) just waving something that looks like a passcard at the guard huddled inside his shack gets you through, especially if you're in a group of people doing the same.
I seriously doubt the situation in the US is any different.
Posted by: W at November 18, 2010 02:45 AM (jMRqb)
6
MAYBE TSA SHOULD SETUP SHOP ON THE SOUTHERN BORDER IF THEY REALLY WANT TO PROTECT US CITIZENS
Posted by: lazrtex at November 18, 2010 04:37 PM (WvqFW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Really... This is News?
It's hardly surprising that TMZ has jumped at the chance to embarrass Willow Palin for calling another teenager names. It is also tediously predictable that gay progressives immediately savaged her for using the exact same pejoratives and slurs that they themselves used at that age, and which many of them still utter now in their own fits of rage, or for other Very Important Reasons, like someone giving them a dirty look.
Human beings are imperfect. Hormone- and judgement-challenged teens (i.e., all of them) even more so. They use harsh language to attack one another.
Big effing deal.
The simple fact of the matter is that the legion of the easily offended who are now going after this teenager for, well,
being a teenager, are generally far more offensive, hateful, and vicious than the child they attack. Teenagers use such language as they off-gas raw emotion without a filter. The savages who attack her, however, are calculating in their assaults, and more chronologically mature, if nothing else.
They revel their own intolerance and viscous evil, and then are dim enough to think it is intolerance of their sexuality that leads to them being shunned.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:21 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
If we could only see there souls....what a pile of humineehumhun... we would see.
Posted by: ron at November 17, 2010 07:02 PM (hSa08)
2
"Alaska - where your sure to get a gud education."
Posted by: Alaska Travel Bureau at November 17, 2010 07:51 PM (zNxf/)
3
probably better then the one you think you are getting at harvard...
Posted by: emdfl at November 17, 2010 11:32 PM (zeg6p)
4
This story is simply another illustration of the obvious; the American left is populated by the scum of this earth.
Posted by: ccoffer at November 18, 2010 01:59 PM (/wrlq)
5
The intent and purpose of victim language is to use it to abuse "the other". In this case, gay, queer, faggot, top, bottom, and other perfectly good everyday, safe-for-work-and-children words have been co-opted by "the oppressed minority" and any use of the co-opted words without the express written consent of and license from the "oppressed minority" will result in demonization, dehumanization, and character assassination of "the oppressive individual", regardless of age, sex, race, or disability. The misappropriation of language is a central weapon of the victim class for gaining and keeping power, extorting money, and oppressing "the others".
Posted by: twolaneflash at November 18, 2010 03:40 PM (xb4TD)
Posted by: buy siwy hannah jean at December 11, 2010 06:14 PM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 16, 2010
Happy Birthday, Pajamas Media
Five years already?
My, how time flies. Pajamas has always been a great organization to work with, and Roger, Aaron and the other editors and executives I've worked with have always been straight-shooters. As Roger notes, there have been mistakes, but there have been solid scores as well, both in terms of content and personalities, which seems to have spread over to PJTV as well. It's been a great ride so far, and I' love writing for them.
In related news, progressives are
going to war with themselves over the success of the Huffington Post, and I suspect it will get nasty.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:16 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Breitbart probably knows the truth; he helped Zsa Zsa create the site, IIRC. I'd imagine he's deciding how he can some fun with this mess.
Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin at November 16, 2010 11:24 AM (xsABn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 15, 2010
Tomorrow We Honor a Hero
U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Sal Giunta will be presented with the Medal of Honor tomorrow.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
02:04 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Thank you Staff Sergeant for your Bravery, Thank you America for our Hero's, Thank God Staff Sergeant Giunta survived.
God Bless all our Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine, and Coast Guard who stand between these shores and the "bad guys".
SSgt, USAF, 1968-1973
Posted by: Rubber Ducky at November 15, 2010 09:32 PM (psj9Z)
Posted by: brando at November 17, 2010 10:48 AM (IPGju)
3
Too bad it's being presented by an America hating islamic socialist incompetent false messiah...
I always regretted that my Commissions had Bill Clinton's signature on the last several...shameless bastard.
Posted by: kalashnikat at November 18, 2010 10:49 PM (GHhKF)
4
I'm glad there still poeple who honor our military for their service and sacrifice. They're far more honorable than the beltway group and the civlians who pay at political correctness rather than honor. AND dittos kalashnikat.
Posted by: Nobody at November 19, 2010 11:10 AM (fEnA4)
Posted by: get rockstar denim at December 10, 2010 02:53 PM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 14, 2010
If You Build It, They Will Charge--UPDATED!
UPDATE 11-16-10:
Chevrolet has announced that the Motor Trend Car of the Year for 2011, beating out such strong contenders as the much anticipated Ford Fiesta, is...Maestro, drum roll please!...The Chevy volt! The Chevrolet Volt pseudo-semi-electric car is Motor Trend magazine's 2011 car of the year. According to the AP:
"Motor Trend says the Volt has some of the most advanced engineering ever seen in an American car. The Volt can run up to 50 miles in pure electric mode before a backup gas engine kicks in to give it more range. Motor Trend also said Tuesday that the car is a great value. It costs $33,500 with a federal tax credit, but will likely be cheaper to run than a traditional hybrid. The Volt goes on sale next month."
The EPA has yet to announce a mileage estimate for the Volt (it can't go on sale without it) and Chevy expects that to happen anytime now. Apparently Motor trend has now upped the Volt's range by 10 miles over Chevrolet estimates and is somehow seeing amazing value in a compact car that costs $33,500.00, but only with a $7500.00 tax credit. Oh well. Motor Trend also made the Chevy Vega its car of the year back in the 70's. The more hopeful you get, the less things change.
The ways of American automobile companies are mysterious indeed. Recent evidence would seem to suggest that the three remaining American manufacturers have abandoned any and all knowledge of how to successfully do business in a capitalist democracy, if, that is, they ever truly knew. There was a time when the “Big Three” as they were once known, all but completely owned the domestic market. But then came the 70’s, Jimmy Carter, long gas lines, and the Japanese, who did learn how to do business in a capitalist democracy from--wait for it--us! Patiently, over time, they improved their products and quality, and always offered high mileage, reasonably priced vehicles, vehicles that slowly but surely began to gain market share.
Posted by: MikeM at
09:12 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
One of my stepsons asked his mother and me if we could buy him a Volt for his college graduation gift. After I recovered from laughing, I said if I'm going to drop $41k for a new car, it will be a new G37 or 370z for me!
Posted by: EC at November 15, 2010 10:09 AM (58gfT)
2
The Chevy Volt is an all-electric driveline with an attached genset. It finally dawned on Chevy that if a suitable power source was developed, they would need the all-electric driveline to go with it. Apocryphal tales have it that the whole Volt concept was developed as a test track kludge where a generator set on a trailer was attached to a test vehicle to extend test times. It soon dawned this might be a practical automobile.
On the engine side, generator sets are more efficient because the engine runs at one speed. I don’t know enough electrical engineering but I suspect the Volt makes up for mechanical losses with electrical losses.
On the minus side, the whole car will be drive by wire. The potential for disaster is enormous.
The Volt is an ecological disaster and proponents should be charged with crimes against the environment. The metals required have even more adverse effects than mining iron. Worse yet, the Volt is attached to high concentration point pollution sources; i.e. coal fired powered plants. The eco people are lying that it is clean and hoping & praying that some clean source of electrical energy comes along. It’s not wind or solar power; They’re already protesting against those. Maybe Mr. Fusion?
Posted by: Jerry in Detroit at November 15, 2010 12:12 PM (Mw8xM)
3
Remember the satires about the cars that Government Motors would be making if the government really did take over GM?
This is it.
The world has actually become a satire of itself.
Posted by: Phelps at November 15, 2010 07:41 PM (sj2xb)
4
For that kind of money, I will wait to purchase a hot new Audi A4 TDI with 53MPG. I suspect the fit and finish will compare to the Chevy Volt in the same way an Audi will compare to a Yugo or Lada.
So much for our "betters" knowing what we want. Can we throw all of them out yet? And ensure that we don't have an enormous class of voters dependent upon the charity dispensed by our "betters" that was extorted from productive citizens at the barrel of a gun?
Posted by: iconoclast at November 16, 2010 03:01 PM (MZd0C)
5
I drive less than 19 miles, round trip, to and from work. This car would work for me. If I didn't carpool with my son. And if I didn't run any errands on the way home. And if I don't work in Jan. or Feb. And I could justify tossing down that kind of money on a limited use vehicle.
Posted by: MikeM_inMd at November 16, 2010 11:24 PM (6hI0A)
6
If one doesn't have to drive much an electric car is fairly simple to build and much cheaper than buying one of these over priced buggies which leaves a HUGE carbon footprint (manufacturing wise). Consider also that electric anything is highly inefficient. One has to generate the electricity through some sort of conversion and efficiency goes way down in that process. I suppose politics has destroyed scholarly study and science.
It is a damn shame.
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at November 17, 2010 01:59 PM (brIiu)
7
MikeM the range with the gasoline engine is over 400 miles with a full tank. Better reread about the Volt before writing anymore about it. Not knowing that the Volt has a gas engine/genset makes you look dumb. The GM IPO is doing well at 33 per share. The Audi is a great car, it sure is difficult for our auto workers to compete with those socialized medicine auto workers. They are so much healthier and productive than our own.
Posted by: John ryan at November 17, 2010 06:18 PM (0YS61)
8
FUNNY STORY OF THE DAY: NEIL YOUNG 57 CONTINENTAL HYBRID CAUGHT FIRE AND BURNED DOWN HIS GARAGE HOUSING $1.1MIL IN HIS COLLECTION OF MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS AND GEAR. SO MUCH FOR ITS BETTER TO BURN DOWN THAN TO FADE AWAY HEY NEIL?
Posted by: lazrtex at November 18, 2010 04:43 PM (WvqFW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 12, 2010
Expert Opinion: The "Felon With a Gun" Photo Is Real
I asked you yesterday whether or not you thought the purported photo of a felon holding a gun was real.
Those of you who responded, either in the comments or via email were convinced that the photo is real... and according to an expert I've contacted
you are most likely correct.
Bob,
I have reviewed the photo you sent me showing two men win one apparently holding a pistol in each hand.
It is my opinion that there are no picture elements or artifacts consistent with manipulation of the photo in the area of the arms, hands, and pistols. The shadow patterns on the clothing are consistent with shadows produced by the pistols and they are consistent with the shadows on the ground. The light reflecting from the pistol surfaces are consistent with the scene illumination.
The photo does not appear to have been manipulated. The pistols appear to have been in the man's hands when the photo was taken.
Alexander Jason, CSCSA, CFPH
Senior Certified Crime Scene Analyst
Certified Forensic Photographer
www.alexanderjason.com
This analysis by Mr. Jason validates the two eyewitness accounts from the photographer and the other man in the photo, who claimed to have gone shooting with Lee Booth in a range near the North Carolina/South Carolina border.
BATF Supervisory Special Agent Earl Woodham told me last week on the phone that BATF managers had reviewed all the claims about Booth made in the Pajamas Media article, and that the were "not interested" in pressing charges again him.
I somehow suspect that something more is going on here than a felon holding a gun.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:11 AM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Does that mean the BATF doesn't mind my stills? Or do I need to get a felony conviction on my record before they'll ignore me?
Posted by: Gus Bailey at November 12, 2010 01:52 PM (B5Wgp)
2
Oooh, what about my illicit (not necessarily illegal) AmFO facility.
Sorry, I don't have any bootleg ciggies.
Posted by: Gus Bailey at November 12, 2010 01:53 PM (B5Wgp)
3
Mr Jason, how does that prove the firearms are real? Mr Ahern has long made firearms for movies and tv. detonics guns were in miami vice, mr and mrs smith and several others. It is well known Mr Ahern has issues due to business with Mr Booth. If Ahern is the witness and he says the guns are real how is that credible? Trial by news media. I think Mr Owens has made some errors in his story and he is waiting for the legal action that will most likely be coming. I suspect Mr Ahern put him up to it. I also know NC is one of the many states that has or did have automatic rights Restoration programs. I think Mr Owens last statement is more a plea for help with legal fees. I would like to hear Mr Booth's side of the story personally. JMHO
Posted by: Bill at November 12, 2010 03:54 PM (s8RAw)
4
So let me see if I understand your assertion, Bill.
Are you claiming that Mr. Booth was supplied with movie guns to frame him? And that Booth couldn't tell the difference between a movie gun and a real one?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at November 12, 2010 05:33 PM (gAi9Z)
5
There is an anomaly. The mini- in his right hand is cocked. What moron poses holding two handguns with one of them obviously cocked. Also the way his hands are held; it is more like you would hold them if you were holding a long gun.
The shadow against the shirt for the other one looks to be slghtly off angle. I can see why there might be a question.
When I question whether a picture is real; I look at the edging around the object or person. It is right at the edges that there will be surreality. In this case I wonder what is the deal just under the left thumb just after the rear sight.
Could be my imagination but this picture does look tampered.
Posted by: ron at November 13, 2010 01:59 AM (02n2A)
6
Ron,
If you would look, you would see that BOTH weapons are cocked.
So much for anomalies.
Posted by: Bill Smith at November 13, 2010 07:08 PM (x/3yb)
7
I thought so, it was not as particularly obvious on the one in the left hand. Still stupid.
Posted by: ron at November 14, 2010 01:29 AM (vc9i5)
8
All this concern for a felon possessing guns reminds me that I don't agree that felons should lose their right to own guns, or vote or anything else once they have served their sentences.
Maybe if they are murderers or otherwise violent can I see this lifetime ban.
Lets not fall in line with the anti gun crown over this "felon with gun" idea.
Posted by: gary foster at November 14, 2010 01:24 PM (GqnnX)
9
"Are you claiming that Mr. Booth was supplied with movie guns to frame him?"
More likely he knew the guns were fake and so does the FBI, the shot being set up as a promo for his company in such a way that there's no legal problem.
And you got all upset and are the one duped by mistakenly believing what your eyes want you to believe, that your chosen villain has broken the law and the federal government is complicit in it.
Posted by: JTW at November 15, 2010 03:12 AM (jMRqb)
10
JTW, both handguns are real. Booth had just fired both of them at a firing range, in front of people more than willing to testify witnesses in a court of law as witnesses, and I happen to know the exact location of the Detonics .45 in Booth's left hand (on the right in the photo), because I know who currently owns it.
Do you have any other inane commentary to add?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at November 15, 2010 09:27 AM (S9Rfu)
11
So? Intent is what matters. There are all kinds of felonies. I know a few felons who continue to hold their law enforcement jobs. They are a real danger.
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at November 15, 2010 10:40 AM (brIiu)
12
So you got George Costanza as your photo manipulation expert?
Posted by: Free pioneer at November 17, 2010 08:02 PM (6QekN)
13
online womens clothing
Posted by: online womens clothing at December 10, 2010 03:41 PM (7fapR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 37 >>
Processing 0.03, elapsed 0.165 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1532 seconds, 124 records returned.
Page size 81 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.