Confederate Yankee
April 17, 2011
The Erik Scott Case, Update 11: Heroism and Loathing in Las Vegas
THE LOCAL MEDIA AWAKENS:
Since the posting of Update 10.3 on April 02 (scroll down for that update), Scott Wyland of the Las Vegas Review-Journal has filed an article (here) on April 12 reporting on the story I broke about AB320, the bill filed by Assemblyman John Hambrick (R-Las Vegas) that would allow Clark County District Attorney David Roger to declare that no coroner’s inquest was necessary in any--or every--future police-involved shooting. It’s good to see that the local Las Vegas media is dealing with the issues revolving around this situation, but a bit disquieting to realize that a members of the pajamas set, a blog, keeps beating them to the story.
Before continuing, here is source material to which you may wish to refer:
For the Las Vegas Review-Journal article on AB320, go
here.
For the Las Vegas Review-Journal Article on the award given two of the officers who shot Erik Scott go
here.
For an additional LVR-J article on the testimony at the Committee hearing, go
here.
For the National Association of Police Organizations home page, go
here.
For a listing of that organization’s officers and directors, go
here.
For information on that organizations TOP COPS program, go
here.
For officers receiving honorable mentions, go
here.
That said, Wyland also added that DA Roger is, like the Police Protective Association (PPA), pushing for the enactment of the bill. Wyland notes:
“...the police union and district attorney are now fighting in Carson City to dissolve inquests before the first case is heard under the new rules.
If the bill passes, the district attorney would investigate the deadly incidents and determine whether to file criminal charges, which he has the power to do now. Information from the investigations would be made public.”
NOTE: This post was updated on 04-17-11.
Posted by: MikeM at
01:28 AM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Dear Mike,
I do so enjoy your artistic disclaimers!
It is, however, unfortunate that our Officers could not use one of them there elegant disclaimers (which allow some to err with confidence) in those split-second adverse circumstances, eh.
Buck
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 18, 2011 11:50 AM (hGqbZ)
2
They did have that option, buck. They could not shoot.
What were the results if they where wrong to not shoot? A cop might get killed. What are the results when they were wrong to shoot? An innocent citizen is killed by a cop.
I think most urban cops now prefer to shoot and risk killing an innocent citizen rather than themselves.
I think a cop from 50 years ago would call them cowards and tell them to get a job at the local soda counter.
Posted by: Phelps at April 19, 2011 12:38 PM (//UsV)
3
If the incident didn't require the use of force, then you wouldn't need a disclaimer or qualified immunity, would you.
Try to keep up, Phelps.
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 19, 2011 08:35 PM (hGqbZ)
4
You are my intake, I have few web logs and very sporadically run out from post .
Posted by: Life Plus at April 19, 2011 10:44 PM (/0UHP)
5
Dear Buck:
Welcome back. I've been over this ground before in earlier updates, but briefly, for the benefit of readers unfamiliar with those updates, it's important to note just a few pertinent facts:
(1) Police officers are trained to be able to remain calm and analytical in high stress situations. In fact, they pride themselves on that ability and their reputations among their peers are very much dependent upon their demonstrated ability to consistently do just that.
(2) Officers must be able to take the time-and it may be a matter of seconds, even less--to be certain that they are completely justified in firing their weapons. Virtually anywhere but Las Vegas, "the suspect made a furtive movement so I shot him," doesn't cut it.
(3) If this was not so, if this was not the performance expected of professional officers, tens of thousands of citizens would die needlessly every year. After a decade on the job, I lost count of the number of people I might have shot under looser standards, yet I never actually had to shoot anyone, though I came close on several occasions. I even know of bona fide cases where officers allowed suspects to shoot at them because they had sufficient cover and no other citizens were endangered, without shooting back. They bided their time and observed, eventually ending the situations without anyone dying. My experience is, thankfully, the rule rather than the exception.
(4) The best way to be able to take the time to be absolutely right is to be tactically smart, and it is here that the officers who shot Scott failed badly. They had plenty of time by usual police standards, but allowed events to control them. Indeed, sometimes officers have no choice, but in the Scott case, they did, but choose not to take advantage of it. Surely you can agree with this?
Ultimately, sufficient facts will likely surface in this case so that we'll all have a much better idea of what actually occurred. If my current theory is right, there will be no gloating for Erik Scott will still be dead and many lives damaged. If it's wrong, I'll make all necessary corrections.
Posted by: mikemc at April 19, 2011 11:34 PM (j1x9K)
6
Thank you for responding, Mike.
So far, you've had no confidence in the Officers on the scene, the Sheriff, the M.E. inquest, the Judge, the jury or the D.A. I surmise, if it gets to a civil trial (which I doubt) and the judgment is not to your rational, then the civil system will also be dubious along with the criminal justice system.
BTW, in my world, events could be controlled as long as everybody cooperated. When that infinite harmony ceased (or never existed), the EVENTS always dictated my response - always. You're in denial if you think it works contrarily.
{Before you ask, yes I was in fact a Sicarii assassin in an earlier life.}
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 20, 2011 11:18 AM (hGqbZ)
7
There are plenty of criminals with badges.
Justice don't need no stinkin' badge.
It can even be visited upon police.
Posted by: Odins Acolyte at April 21, 2011 11:41 AM (7qwzH)
8
Your analyses are terrific, Mike. Whether Erik's case gets to trial or not, the truth WILL be revealed, both in this forum, through your updates, and via books I'm writing.
There's a high probability that my fictional story ("The Permit") and a documentary of actual events will be seen in movie theaters and on TV, as well.
On Erik's behalf, may justice prevail — and soon.
Posted by: Bill Scott at April 21, 2011 06:49 PM (HbfKy)
9
An interesting claim, that the responding police officers should have done nothing, just sit around to see if Scott was doing anything wrong, soley because dispatchers make mistakes. Or security guards lie, as you implied at the begining.
In fact, police officers are supposed to take action: investigate, interview, detain, question, etc. Sure, sometimes surveillance is called for, but not when there is a report of a man acting strangely with a gun.
There is no reason to believe that Scott was legally armed, as he did not respond to requestes from Costco to leave. Therefore, the police had eminently reasonable beliefs that Scott was a danger.
Interstingly enough, you criticize them for missing Scott when he left the Costco store, but then claim they should have remained at the entrance to the store looking for him. Well, that would have accomplished nothing.
And there is no evidence whatso ever that the police acted wrongly. The majority of witnesses stated that Scott drew his gun at a minimum, with others claiming that he pointed it at the officers. Even Scott's girl-friend admitted that he drew the gun.
That contradicts any claim that the officers should have waited for further events after he drew his weapon.
Of course, he drew his weapon because he was hopped up on drugs. Even if the police officers commands appeared to you to be contradictory, there is no reason to believe a rational person in response to police commands: Stop, don't move, get down on the ground, put your hands up; would respond by drawing a firearm.
I certainly would not call the Scott family system-savy. They are just firing off allegations, then, when called out to prove them, immediately backtrack, as in the fact that they dropped charges against Costco, who you alleged/concluded/speculated were co-conspirators in covering up the facts of the shooting.
I also note that they aren't suing the fire fighter who allegedly found and failed to report the second gun that the County then allegedly broke into Scott's apartment to seize or plant. Or was it the fire fighter did not find? I am just so uncertain about that missing gun theory.
Posted by: Federale at April 22, 2011 05:23 PM (PWWdd)
10
Once again, your Metro pig buddies at their finest:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/exclusive-police-beating-of-las-vegas-man-caught-on-tape-120509439.html#blogcomments?submitted=y
I hope you're proud.
Posted by: Mark Matis at April 22, 2011 09:35 PM (LzG0h)
11
"Metro pig buddies." Wow, isn't that hate speech? Are those insults? Shouldn't this commentator be banned?
Posted by: Federale at April 24, 2011 10:53 AM (7xqyd)
12
Federale:
Mark, like Crooks, has a history of anti-Law Enforcement activity. He's out there operating without any restraint, totally beyond the pale of any acceptable human conduct. And, he is STILL posting without taking his meds!
I see no agreeable resolution for his lying morality.
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 24, 2011 03:21 PM (hGqbZ)
13
"First, let me thank the creator of this site. I've learned so much about law enforcement, almost all of it good. Of course, not much good with Metro.
I lived in Vegas for 30 years, terrified of them for the last couple decades.
Until I started reading Confederate Yankee, I made assumptions that LV Metro acted like other LE Agencies. Now that I no longer live there, I get to see LE in a completely different light, making me SUPER ANGRY that I lived in LV all those years, being in fear.
I have lived in 2 states since leaving NV, and both states have proven, LE really are 'peace' officers, not thugs. The acts of kindness just astound me and each time I say, "Would'a never happened in Vegas!"
In an earlier update, Mike wrote about how an officer is trained for a traffic stop. The person getting the ticket should drive away with a GOOD feeling, not negative. And the stop should be completed within X amount of minutes. My son and I laughed so hard over that...and then he got a ticket back here. As he pulled into my driveway I said, "How was the officer?"
He said, "Mom, you wouldn't believe it. He was so kind, he never once put his hand on his gun, he even apologized that he had to write the ticket but I was going 2 miles over the 'allowable' spread they give for a warning. And the whole thing took less than 10 minutes.
I knew then, this guy on Confederate Yankee was on target! There really were cops out there that could let you leave a ticket incident with a good feeling.
I'm sorry the Scotts had to lose their son in order for Metro's behaviors to come to light. Us that have lived in Vegas can tell 101 stories of encounters with Metro of people we knew or what happened to us....including Deacons from church being thrown over cars, guns being drawn on us while being stopped for our 30-day tags (and although released after they seen the registration, the 'thuggish' mentality prevailed throughout the stop), and on and on.
Confederate Yankee is what is going to finally make a change in law enforcement in the Las Vegas valley.
I have often commented, I wish we could have this author run for Sheriff in Las Vegas. Pretty Please?
Thanks for the blogs. You really seem like a remarkable man..and thank you for your years of service! We need to clone you!"
Posted by: Reason111 at April 26, 2011 08:54 PM (mAJ4p)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 15, 2011
History Repeating
My latest article at Pajamas Media deals with another faked hate crime at a university in North Carolina. And no, lacrosse players weren't falsely accused this time.
And yes, the community still
plans to protest the faked crime.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:31 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
April 14, 2011
Obama Doubles Down On The Budget
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is truly amazing. Whenever I am certain that he has sunk to the absolute depths of mendacity and rank partisanship, whenever I have no doubt that his socialistic urges have sunk to the lowest measurable level, he digs a hole--nay, hires a dredge (with taxpayer dollars, of course)--and sinks even lower. I speak, of course, of his April 13 teleprompter reading on fixing America’s burgeoning debt.
All of the usual elements of an Obama TP reading were present: halting delivery, left-right-left head-waggling reminiscent of a fan at a tennis match, blaming nearly everything on Bush, blaming everything else on Republicans, class warfare, attacking the evil, greedy wealthy, “facts” and figures plucked wholesale from the ether, economic assumptions based on projected income or events that no sentient being believes will be forthcoming, the economic miracle that is ObamaCare, winning the future, and vision but no real, concrete details. As usual, Mr. Obama is leaving the little, niggling details to the little people.
False choices and moral hectoring, as usual, played a prominent role. Attacking Republicans, Mr. Obama said “Their vision is less about reducing the deficit than it is about changing the social compact in America.” Wasn’t it Mr. Obama who has consistently promised (threatened?) to “fundamentally change America?” Ah, but those evil Republicans are attacking “children with autism or Down’s syndrome,” favoring instead “every millionaire and billionaire in our society.”
Wasn’t it Mr. Obama who swept into office promising to change the tone in Washington and to bridge the partisan divide? There is nothing quite like accusing political opponents of intending to savage handicapped children to win friends and influence people. “You’ve just accused me of the most craven and base moral degeneracy? Why of course I’ll be happy to work with you on a bipartisan basis, Mr. Obama!”
NOTE: Sources for this article may be found
here,
here,
here,
here,
here and
here.
Posted by: MikeM at
06:07 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
My sainted grandma used to say it and it's true: people will accuse you of what they would do themselves. And that's what Mr. Obama is doing.
Marianne Matthews
Posted by: Marianne Matthews at April 17, 2011 04:13 PM (Aaj8s)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Duke LAX Rape Accuser to Face Murder Charges in Stabbing Death
Duke University's "Gang of 88" faculty members really backed a winner in Chrystal Mangum:
The man Crystal Mangum is accused of stabbing has died, Durham Police Department Chief Jose Lopez Sr. said Wednesday.
Mangum already was in jail under a $300,000 secured bond charged with assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury.
"More than likely, we will be upgrading the charge to murder," Lopez said.
In 2006, Mangum, 32, falsely accused three Duke University lacrosse players of raping her.
Mangum had just been in court on December in an arson case where she had threatened to stab her previous boyfriend. That trial ended in a mistrial.
Perhaps this time they'll put this psychopath in prison for life, where she belongs.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:00 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
1. Black 2. female 3. lib darling, 6 years max.
Posted by: ck at April 15, 2011 12:58 AM (T7cdX)
2
"1. Black 2. female 3. lib darling, 6 years max."
Followed by job offers from NPR and invitations to teach at Harvard and Northwestern University, if she'll mouth standard leftist rhetoric.
Posted by: pst314 at April 18, 2011 10:16 AM (OA547)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 13, 2011
Quick Takes, April 13, 2011
ITEM: Is This Cool Or What? Department: From Fox News (here) comes news of a GPS guided mortar round already entering service in Afghanistan. This innovation promises much greater precision at the lower levels of our order of battle, giving our ground troops a much greater margin of effectiveness and safety. Greatest nation in the history of the world? Discuss.
ITEM: Is This Cool Or What II? Department: We’ve previously reported on US Navy research into a practical ship-bourn laser weapon, but the first practical test has been completed. Go
here for a video and story. For the first time, a lower powered laser fired at a moving target, a mile distant, in four-foot seas set the engines ablaze within seconds. Very cool indeed. Work is underway on a massively more powerful free electron laser that promises to be able to more or less instantly swat missiles from the sky in all weather conditions. As you watch the video, remember that lasers do not produce a visible beam, ala Star Trek and Star Wars.
ITEM: In the Same Old, Same Old, Department, Instapundit (
here) reports on a trip by Mr. Obama to a wind turbine plant where he said there is nothing he can do in the short term to effect gasoline prices. When someone in the audience complained about high gas prices, Mr. Obama suggested that he trade in his car for one that gets better mileage. Uh, Mr. Obama? Saying that drilling for oil is useless because it will take several years to get production up to speed doesn’t work anymore. It’s several years later and gas is climbing rapidly to $5.00 a gallon. Oh yes, and because of your economic debacle, most folks can’t afford new cars, especially if they cost $41,000 like your Chevy Volt wonder greeniemobile. The best part is that the story by the AP, which originally reported on this issue has since been sanitized and rewritten to squelch Mr. Obama’s haughtily offensive suggestion to his questioner. Good to know our mainstream media is looking out for the interests of the public by not worrying their pretty little heads with Mr. Obama’s condescension and economic cluelessness.
ITEM: Well, it’s final. The United States Congress and Mr. Obama have agreed to cut: Wait for it...$38.5 billions dollars! That’s right, almost nothing at all. Visit John Hinderaker’s piece at Powerline (
here) for his take on this non-event which staved off a government shutdown. I’m still not sure why that would be a bad thing. Anyway, Hinderaker has a balanced, rational outlook on this issue, and the Ramirez cartoon, like so much of his work, is a classic, though sure to provoke cries of “RACIST!” All the more reason to view it like the good little racists all those who disagree with Mr. Obama are.
ITEM: According to the LA Times (
here), the White House is worried that rising gas prices could derail Mr. Obama’s reelection hopes. Ya think? What to do? They’re arranging a series of opportunities for Mr. Obama to give teleprompter readings! They’re going to give him the opportunity to reassure the public that he has a plan to lower prices, which have risen 30% in the last year. Ah! That explains why he’s telling people worried about high gas prices to buy more fuel efficient cars! That’ll convince folks, won’t it? Discuss.
ITEM: Continuing Tales Of The Religion Of Peace Department: Peaceful Palestinians hit an Israeli school bus with a peaceful anti-tank missile on April 7, seriously wounding a 16 year old boy and the bus driver. Fortunately. Most of the kids got off the bus only minutes earlier. And these are the people with whom President Obama reflexively sides? Sigh. Yes, they are. Go
here for the whole story.
ITEM: Blasts From The Past! Department: Go
here for an interesting—and sobering—analysis of our fiscal problem by former Reagan budget guru David Stockman. Yes, it is as bad as you think it is, and worse.
ITEM: In the bad old days of the Cold War, and even today, Communist regimes always talk about “The People’s” this and “The People’s” that. It is part of the inherent propaganda of communism, and an essential part of the big lie that communist governments care for their people. Mao cared so much that he killed, arguably, 100 million of his “the people.” Congressional Democrats have produced their own budget outline, and the most amazing coincidence! They’re calling it “The People’s Budget.” Anyone who is not offended—and deeply concerned—by this, knows nothing of history or of communism, or worse, is very well aware. Go
here to read the whole thing. Notice that they are not afraid to tell “the people” that they intend to reduce our strategic capabilities—to greatly decrease our ability to defend ourselves and others. To what has Barack Obama—The One--brought us?
ITEM: Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-State of Incoherence) recently delivered a speech (
here) wherein she observed that in 1994 Republicans were elected to defund the National Endowment of the Arts, but in 2010, they were elected to “kill women.” Uh…what?! Ladies and Gentlemen: Your Democrat representatives! (cue laugh track and rim shot)
ITEM: Louis Renault Award of the Millennium: Yes, those peaceful humanitarians of Iran are at it again. The world was recently shocked, shocked! to discover yet another previously unknown nuclear facility where the Iranians were producing centrifuge parts--according to them--for purely peaceful purposes, of course. Read the whole thing
here. I’m shocked, shocked! that Mr. Obama’s smart diplomacy and serious sanctions don’t appear to be having any effect on the peaceful theocratic lunatics who run Iran and export peaceful terror around the globe. Perhaps if Mr. Obama gives another teleprompter reading to the Muslim world?
ITEM: Uh, Who Are The Children Here? Via Fox News (
here), a football coach in San Diego attacked and seriously injured a man when he thought he overheard the man trying to recruit one of his players. The players were 9, 10 and 11 years old. “Get a life” comes to mind...
ITEM: Drinkin’ Good In the Neighborhood! A 15 month old toddler in a Michigan Applebee’s began to act strangely. His mother found that what she thought was apple juice was actually margarita mix. The manager of the Applebee’s called it “unacceptable.” Well, yeah. Go
here for the story. LATE UPDATE: Apparently the kiddie was served booze due to a labeling mixup. Applebees plans to dispense all juices in sealed, individual containers from now on. Good idea.
ITEM: At Hot Air (
here) Jazz Shaw has an article on the incredible self-delusion of progressives who cannot imagine why the Tea Party and it’s obviously stupid, horribly flawed ideals is, well, kicking their butts. Shaw takes a bit of vicarious pleasure in their misery. It’s worth reading to provide a bit of insight into what passes for thinking in progressive circles, but do not, gentle reader, begin your victory dance just yet. Thus far, we have only saved or slightly hindered a tiny portion of an ever-expanding and still out of control budget and bureaucracy. We’ve successfully fired the first signal flare in what will certainly be a very long and bitterly fought war. The live ammunition has not yet begun to fly.
ITEM: The “We’re Doing WHAT?!” Department: The Obama Administration, mired in the worst debt crisis in American, nay, in world history, is going to spend $20 million to: Wait for it...remake Sesame Street in Pakistan! There just aren’t words... Some are apparently saying, “hey, it’s only $20 million...” I dunno. Seems like a lot of money to me regardless of what it’s for. Why, I’d bet that if you started saving 20 million here and 20 million there, eventually, it would add up to some real money! Go
here if you have the stomach.
ITEM: Newsmax (
here) has a story on the never-ending fun in Wisconsin. As you may recall, Wisconsin Supreme Court hopeful JoAnn Kloppenburg, who all but promised to be a partisan progressive rubber stamp, declared victory with a 200+ vote margin. Then, miracle of miracles, some 15,00 uncounted votes were discovered and incumbent Justice David Prosser was suddenly up by 7500 votes, which will most likely hold and be outside the trigger for a state-paid recount. How do we know this is likely an honest mistake rather than criminal vote fraud? Easy: It benefited a Republican. Gov. Scott Walker is vowing that unions won’t be able to cheat their way to victory. Wisconsin is becoming an endless source of entertainment, and I thought that all it had to recommend it was cheese hats.
ITEM: Say, wasn’t there some sort of trouble in one of those foreign places, like last week or so. You know, like, Venezlulu, or Nobukistan, or Libya maybe? Wasn’t it Libya or something like that? Go
here for Mark Steyn’s take. Apparently the non-war with a non-battle plan for non-victory is going non-well under the non-inspired non-guidance of our non-Commander-In-Chief. What a non-relief!
ITEM: Remember the multiple injunctions issued by Judge Sumi in Wisconsin on behalf of the unions? Go
here to find out, specifically, why everything she did was illegal under Wisconsin law. But hey, what’s a little thing like breaking the law when public sector union pocketbooks are at risk? It’s all about the money. It always was.
ITEM: Are you a state laboring under oppressive DOJ interference? Want to take on the Holder DOJ and not only win, but kick its nether regions a considerable distance down the road? Visit
here to find out how. There may be justice in the world after all.
ITEM: Even in the People’s Democrat Republic of Illinois, it seems, some sanity may yet exist. State Attorney General Lisa Madigan, determined to release the names of law-abiding gun owners to the press, has been temporarily restrained by the Illinois House which passed a bill to keep those names—remind me again why any state should be collecting the names of gun owners?—private. Go
here for the whole mess.
ITEM: Signs of the Apocalypse Department: From Fox News (
here) comes the tale of a man and woman who robbed a lemonade stand, taking $150 that three girls had raised for charity. The woman was arrested but the man is still at large. What, I wonder, besides lengthy prison terms, would be an appropriate punishment? Mandatory lemon sucking for life?
ITEM: Harry Reid Follies Redux: In this space, we’ve criticized Sen. Harry Reid (D-State of Delusion) for weeping over the coming cowboy poetry apocalypse. The New York Times (
here), of all places (Yeeeha! Git along, little urban doggies!) has a sympathetic article on the topic. Paul Zarzyski, a cowboy poet said:
“A lot of art forms at first brush might sound peculiar,” he said. “After you learn a little bit about them and the people who perform them, you find out that they are as significant as any kind of art forms. Cowboy poetry comes out of a culture that most people don’t understand. Most of that criticism is urban and uninformed.”
Not really, Paul. We suburban, informed types just don’t believe that money falls out of the back of chuck wagons, and if it’s a choice between, for example, ammunition for our troops or, well, cowboy poetry, we’ll go for the most bang for the buck anytime.
ITEM: And You Wonder Why Public Education Get A Bad Reputation? Department: From Michelle Malkin (
here) comes the story of a Chicago elementary school where the principal has decided she knows better than parents and has enacted a nanny-state policy to protect them from themselves. The policy? Kids can’t bring lunch from home; they have to eat cafeteria food. Unsurprisingly, a great many kids choose to eat nothing at all rather than the wonderfully nutritious and tasty choices provided on the school menu. Isn’t forcing kids to eat school food a violation of the Geneva Conventions? Perhaps a violation of the Constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment? Where are the human rights types when you need them? Oh, the humanity!
ITEM: Cruzin! Department: I’ve been taking General (Government) Motors to task of late for wasting taxpayer dollars, primarily with the Chevy Volt. Now, from the Wall Street Journal (
here), comes news of some minor difficulties with another Chevy offering: The Cruze, which is the new small car on which Chevy is basing a significant part of its post-bailout fortunes. Apparently the proud owner of a new Cruze was making a turn and the steering wheel broke off in their hands. Boy, that’s winning the future! Chevy has issued a recall (good idea!) and said that they will fix the problem for free (that’s big of them). Hmm. Have they asked Mr. Obama about that? He’ll probably want a repair tax added. Your taxpayer dollars at work!
ITEM: Do you remember when Mr. Obama was a senator way back in 2008, a senator taking gratuitous shots at Mr. Bush for high gas prices and for having the unbelievably high unemployment rate of 5.5%? Yeah, well, Mr. Obama would like you to forget that. After all, 10% functional unemployment and gas prices shooting toward $5.00 per gallon aren’t his fault and he can’t do anything about it anyway! That’s right, the man who could stop the rise of the seas and heal the planet is helpless! Read more at Powerline,
here.
ITEM: Libya Update: Kaddafi is still in power, the war continues, our planes are still withdrawn, the French say that NATO isn’t enough, and Mr. Obama—like any semblance of American leadership or resolve—is absent. Hmm. Doesn’t demonstrated weakness and irresolution encourage tribal, Islamist barbarians? But hey, we’re winning the future! Or something...
ITEM: Further News From The Religion Of Peace Department: According to Reuters, as reported in the Jerusalem Post (
here), Iran has announced plans to build “four our five” new nuclear reactors “in the next few years.” Iran plans to use these reactors for research and to produce medical radioisotopes. Suuuuuuure they do. One wonders what kind of sanctions Mr. Obama will want to impose when the first Iranian nuc goes off in Israel or America. No doubt it is only smart diplomacy that has prevented Iran for already having a bomb—maybe.
ITEM: And speaking of energy, the Washington Examiner (
here) reports that America has the largest reserves of untapped energy on the entire planet. Exploiting those resources would greatly increase energy supplies while greatly lowering costs, and none of this exploitation would cost a single taxpayer dollar. So let’s see if I have this straight: We have the means, at no cost to the taxpayer, to immediately stimulate the economy, greatly increase the number of solid, long-term jobs, reduce our dependence on energy from hostile foreign suppliers, increase our national security, lower prices on just about everything, and to help to pay down the budget deficit. So of course, Mr. Obama is vehemently opposed, despite his rhetoric to the contrary. Is that about it? Thought so.
ITEM: So what does the hard Left think about budget cuts? Visit a column by Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post (
here) to get a glimpse into the cobwebbed recesses of the liberal brain. An example: “There’s no question who won last week’s showdown. The outcome — nearly $40 billion in painful cuts — goes well beyond the GOP’s initial demands.” To Robinson, $40 billion cut from a multi-trillion dollar deficit is painful and unreasonable. Basically, liberals actually appear to believe that the Federal Government is not nearly large enough and that it is not possible to cut even a penny from the budget, unless, of course, it comes directly out of the defense budget. That we can cut, no problem. The article is certainly informative, but probably not as Mr. Robinson intended.
ITEM: From Fox News (
here) comes news of The California Federation of Teachers which has passed a resolution renewing its support for convicted Philadelphia cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal. Abu-Jamal has long been a liberal icon, despite overwhelmingly conclusive evidence of his guilt, including multiple eye witnesses, his possession of the gun used to kill the officer, and a bullet fired by the officer he killed recovered from his own personal body. Despite all of this, he has become a liberal symbol of the racism and injustice of the system. Power to the people, right on! One might be forgiven for wondering what business a teacher’s union might have dealing with an issue like this—particularly where the object of their affections is so utterly loathsome--but then again, what business does a teacher’s union have being a subsidiary of and fund raiser for the Democrat party?
ITEM: Louis Renault Award for March: Remember all the mainstream media news stories about the Iranian cargo plane forced to land in Turkey by Turkish fighters in March? Remember the international outrage when it was discovered that the plane carried 600 kilos of explosives, mortars, assault rifles, rocket launchers and about $560 million in cash, all bound for Hezbollah through Syria? You don’t? I’m shocked, shocked! that you didn’t. Well, maybe not so much. Google the event and you’ll discover much Israeli and internet coverage, but otherwise? After all, all of those goodies were only destined to kill Israelis, you know, Jews. It only had the potential to inflame an entire region of strategic interest to the United States. Why would that be news? Oh, right! It would embarrass Mr. Obama. Go
here for the rest.
ITEM: Remember how Obamites postulated that once ObamaCare was a fait accompli, everyone would find out what was in it and just love it up one side and down the other? Reality, fortunately, is not quite so sanguine. According to a recent AP poll (
here), only 35% support ObamaCare, which is almost tied with the low of 34% during the season of entertaining town hall meetings, during which many Democrats were nearly tarred, feathered and run out of town on rails. How’s that hope and change workin’ out for yah?
ITEM: In the “Oh Goody” Department, comes the news (
here) that the Magma pocket under Yellowstone National Park’s super volcano is likely far larger than had been previously suspected. The last eruption, which was about 600,000 years ago, blanketed much of North American was a thick blanket of ash. According to scientists, a super eruption occurs about once every 600,000 years…uh-oh…
ITEM: Continuing with the unceasing tradition of public employee labor union altruism and civic-mindedness, the California Teacher’s association (
here) has budgeted one million dollars for protests against upcoming cuts to education in a state that is about ready, economically speaking, to slide off the map into the Pacific any day now. Among the tactics they’ve posted on their website:
“Follow targeted legislators for the entire day.”
“Have students and parents camp in front of schools all night.’
And my personal favorite:
“Work with organization[sic] like Ben & Jerry to have them create a labor-union flavored ice cream that can be sold at the rallies and in stores.”
Like what, exactly, would mouth-watering “labor-union flavored ice cream” taste? Would that be anything like “environmental-activist flavored ice cream?” The mind boggles. Discuss.
Mark Twain was right: Truth is stranger than fiction. And on that somewhat disquieting note, thanks for stopping by, and I’ll see you next Thursday!
Posted by: MikeM at
08:20 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
im guessing labor union flavor is flavored using sweaty shirts from fat thugs who collect paychecks they didnt earn while threatening women who dont want how they voted to be public.
side note, why the heck is my having my blog addy in the url box questionable content? really guys, deal with that
Posted by: rumcrook at April 13, 2011 11:23 PM (60WiD)
2
@rumcrock , I assume labor union flavored ice cream tastes like the bottom of your shoes after walking through the Wisconsin Statehouse.
Once again, fantastic Quick Takes! Keep up the great work.
Tarheel Repub Out!
Posted by: Tarheel Repub at April 14, 2011 12:23 PM (prDeJ)
3
GPS mortar rounds and lasers?
I think I just wet myself.
Now all we need is Rules of Engagement that allow us to use our tech to destroy their asses.
Posted by: Stretch at April 14, 2011 12:35 PM (IZttV)
4
The ice-cream would obviously taste like assholes and picket signs. Obama can have my share.
Posted by: Marty at April 14, 2011 01:18 PM (as+G7)
5
Ref the GPS mortar rounds, son's in an artillery unit, and a few months back was telling me about the new-generation GPS-guided 155mm artillery shells. From what he said one of the big uses for them is counter-battery fire, because the gun doesn't have to line up precisely on the target location before firing. I can't remember the numbers offhand, but the gun can be an amazing number of degrees off-line from the target and the shell still guide to and hit.
Add this to the vehicle close-in defense system the Israelis have out, if they get the THEL working in the field we're going to have some armored unit calling themselves the Slammers.
Posted by: Firehand at April 15, 2011 12:41 PM (DS4xK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
UNC Student Falsified Hate Crimes Allegations
At least this liar was shot down before anyone was falsely accused.
I anticipate his expulsion from the university as a warning to others.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:45 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Nah, I anticipate him being put on the fast-track for professorship and tenure.
Posted by: Phelps at April 13, 2011 12:32 PM (0WBM9)
2
You can anticipate all you want, they will never boot this scumbag, they may make him stay home on the weekends and then call it an expulsion but they will make sure he is not punished.
Posted by: David at April 13, 2011 09:08 PM (uE92S)
3
Thousands of students have attended a rally for this misanthrope wearing bandages of sympathy for him in the "Stop the Hate" rally. I believe he will be placed on the fast track to graduate and go on to graduate school and become faculty. I can promise you that the Chancellor of UNC, Holden Tharp will not punish this student for his illegal activity and his breaking of the University Honor Code. It will not happen.
Posted by: DocRambo at April 19, 2011 11:19 AM (2cqrK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 11, 2011
Me? Own A Gun? Article 5: Cartridges and Carrying
In this final installment of the five part series (the first four installments may be found here, here, here and here), I’ll explore the basics of cartridge and holster choice, and add a few interesting additional tidbits. I hope this series has been useful and informative.
CARTRIDGE CHOICE:
Cartridge choices for handguns are relatively simple. For revolvers, the .38 special and .357 magnum predominate. One can also obtain revolvers in .44 special, .44 magnum and larger, specialized cartridges most commonly used for hunting, but for most people choosing a revolver, the choice is .38 special or .357 magnum. The .357 is nothing more than a .38 special with a slightly longer case which allows more powder, greater bullet velocity, and therefore, more power. Smaller revolvers like the Ruger LCR are chambered only in .38 special (there is a .357 model with a different model designation), and while any revolver chambered for .357 magnum will also fire .38 special ammunition, the opposite is not true. It would be wise to consider .38 special to be the smallest cartridge appropriate for self defense in revolvers. Smaller calibers are available, but there is no advantage in size or otherwise in such weapons. Revolvers chambered for .357 magnum and larger calibers are themselves larger and heavier, often much larger and heavier than smaller, short barreled revolvers chambered in .38 special.
Posted by: MikeM at
06:36 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
"At the time, the US Army’s issued handgun and cartridge was a .38 special"
Actually it was the .38 Long Colt, in the M1892 Army & Navy.
As an emergency measure the Army pulled a bunch of M1873 single-action and M1878 double-action .45 Long Colts out of storage. In 1909 the Colt New Service in .45 LC became the standard sidearm; it took a while before it was completely replaced by St John Browning's newfangled shootin' iron.
Posted by: Bohemond at April 12, 2011 02:59 AM (dwXf/)
2
I dunno. All this talk of "personal responsibility." It's so 19th Century.
Posted by: Tango Juliet at April 12, 2011 07:44 AM (s0R0P)
3
Thanks for the reminders.
BTW, the US Army does not subscribe to the policy that wounding is preferable to killing. American arms, ammunition and training are designed to take the enemy out of the fight quickly and efficiently. This normally results in death. As you mention, shot placement is the key. An enemy that is only wounded is still caopable of fighting and thus of killing one of us. We find that exchange unacceptable. If we go to all the trounble to shoot someone, we prefer that he stay shot.
For one thing, the US Army tends to not fight civilized nation who care a lot about tending to their wounded companions. Professional armies from civilized countries focus on accomplishing the mission before tending to wounded. We believe that we take fewer casualties if the combat effective people focus on ending the battle then if they all start abandoning their fighting to tend to wounded.
I am not really sure the origen of this myth, but I have not found any historical evidence of a trainied army practicing it.
Annecdote: US Army doctors in Somalia would, as a matter of policy, treat Somalis that had been shot by American soldiers. They did this for humanitarian reasons and for the practice dealing with gunshot wounds, which at the time were rare in American medical circles. They were particularly peeved at the sniper teams because none of their targets were surviving long enough to get to the hospital.
Posted by: Professor Hale at April 12, 2011 07:56 AM (PDTch)
4
Jim Cirillo (of the NYPD Stakeout Squad) famously said, "Stopping power begins at 12 gauge."
Posted by: guffaw at April 12, 2011 01:08 PM (Y2dZs)
5
I understand you are limiting your discusison here to revolvers, but I have to disagree with the statement that the smallest caliber that one should consider is a .38. I'll disagree for two primary reasons:
A pistol that you are actually carrying is a lot more effective than one you have in your dresser drawer. I have found that it is socially easier to carry a pocket gun than lug around a larger weapon. I carry a .32 cal semiautomatic that is light and very inconspicuous. The small size and lightness make it easy to carry, and that convenience makes it *more likely* that I will carry it. Sure, a small, light semiauto is less accurate, but the bottom line is that self protection is usually not an issue of shooting at a distance.
Second, there are lots of people who have been killed with smaller caliber weapons. No weapon is a guaranteed kill, and all will kill or disable if the bullet hits the right thing. So, as a corollary to my first point, just as a firearm in hand is better than one in a drawer, a small hole in the chest it better than no hole at all.
Posted by: billo at April 12, 2011 10:45 PM (3Gxjf)
6
im gonna agree wholeheartedly with billo. the whole debate about what is a "real gun" or an effective caliber ammounts to ivory tower gun politics to me.
and ive easily carried my ruger sp101 357 snubby, I think just as easily as my old man caries his slightly smaller 38cal smith&wesson snubby
as for caliber plenty of times ive found my self in the situation billo describes, somethin is better than nuttin, so becuase I had a t-shirt flip flopps and shorts I grabbed a little 380 pocket auto.
my other pet peave is gun snobs who think if a gun didnt cost you an arm and a leg and have the right name your gun should be tossed in the ocean as a joke. I ran into those smug clowns all the time when I shot trap and they had 3000 dollar over and unders from italy and all I had was an 870 remington. still beat thier pants off.
lastly are performance perfectionist snobs, I read a whole review from one guy on a big website where he TRASHED the taurus judge, he called it junk said it couldnt shoot straight, out to, get this,! 75yards!!!! so dont buy it becuase any self respecting gun should be a good shot out to 75yards??!! fer crying out loud! most people feilding a tuarus judge dont expect to be trying frantically to terminate a threat more than 2-5 yards away!!! maybe only 1 or 2 foot away as the bad guy is trying to carjack you!!! who the hell is trying to stop a maniac with a judge from a football field away?
Posted by: rumcrook at April 13, 2011 11:17 PM (60WiD)
7
Dear Behemond:
Thanks for the historical update. Good information, but a bit more than was my goal in writing a basic article. Still, thanks!
Dear Billo and Rumcrook:
Thanks for your comments. Certainly, many people have been killed by .22LR bullets, but as a writer making recommendations for the general public, I have to establish certain baselines, and it's generally accepted that the .38 special and the .380 are the lower end of the effectiveness equation. There are, as you have pointed out, other cartridges, but considering all of the other factors such as cost, availability, recoil, ease of shooting, accuracy, sights, etc. larger is better--to a point. And you'll recall that I did not rule out smaller calibers.
I agree that something is better than nothing, but the difference in size between the smallest weapons chambered for .32 and .380, for example, is generally so small that its probably wiser to go for the larger caliber and more powerful cartridge. Please keep in mind that because I have not said, with righteous indignation, that anything less than the .45 ACP is useless, I'm almost certainly considered a heretic by some proportion of the shooting community.
As to the cost of weapons, I've found that one generally gets what one pays for, in firearms and everything else. In handguns, though, this is only true up to a point. An $800 Walther will not be any more reliable or accurate than a $450 Glock, for example. And it is true that I've found some $200 guns to be reasonably reliable and functional, but certainly not of the same quality and longevity of the more expensive weapons. First class design, materials and manufacturing processes simply cost a certain amount of money. Again, I provided some basic cost figures for those who have little or no idea of common market prices.
Your point about a writer who denigrated the Taurus Judge because it was inaccurate at 75 yards is well taken. A revolver designed to primarily fire that .410 shotgun cartridge will certainly never be accurate at that range. Shotguns in that caliber aren't accurate at such ranges either. All weapons must be judged on their performance within the parameters of their designed use.
Posted by: mikemc at April 16, 2011 11:33 AM (j1x9K)
8
Dear Professor Hale:
Thanks for your observations. I agree that our current enemies are not organized militaries that tend to care for their wounded in anything like the way we do. I also agree that our weapons designers design ammunition for its lethality, not in the hope that it will merely wound enemies.
As you no doubt know, there has been a long standing debate about the relative effectiveness of our current 5.56 cartridge, though we will likely be using it well into the foreseeable future for logistics reasons.
My observations were intended to convey the (possibly unintended) effect of treaties that prevent the use of, for example, hollowpoint ammunition. Full metal jacketed ammunition, particularly in pistol calibers, as I noted, will often tend to wound rather than outright kill opponents, and this does, when fighting an organized military--as we have done in past wars--cause that military to expend personnel and resources to care for their wounded.
It has been many years indeed since I served in our military, but if I was on the battlefield today, I'd be happy with nothing less than a disintegrator that would, with a single hit, dissolve my enemy into his constituent atoms. Oh well. One can dream.
Posted by: mikemc at April 16, 2011 11:43 AM (j1x9K)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Obama Recants?
And so it begins. In 2006, Senator Barack Obama voted against raising the debt limit, a vote his various spokesmen now characterize as a “mistake.” Accordingly, Mr. Obama is set to present yet another historic teleprompter reading on Wednesday wherein, on the heels of The Ryan budget proposal, he will lay out his own bold initiative. The public would be well advised to recall that for Mr. Obama, rhetoric is exceedingly cheap, and action, particularly that which would in any way displease the most ardent socialist, exceedingly hard to find.
What is Mr. Obama expected to say? According to various advisors and spokespeople:
(1) The debt limit must be raised or the effect would be “Armageddon-like” for the economy.
(2) Taxes must be substantially raised on the evil, greedy, rich, those making more than $250,000--or so, more or less--per year.
I’ll go out on a limb and predict:
(1) Taxes won’t be raised on the nearly 50% of Americans who pay nothing at all in taxes.
(2) Spending cuts, what spending cuts?
(3) Even more entitlement spending.
(4) High-sounding promises to win the future--or something.
(5) Increased spending on green energy boondoggles, high speed rail, education, anything that will waste huge amounts of money for no good purpose.
We can be absolutely sure that whatever he proposes will require far more government spending, a much larger government, and will further degrade a very shaky economy. There is, to date, no sign that Mr. Obama has changed his view that economic distress can only be addressed by means of much higher taxes and unfathomably greater spending. More after the historic teleprompter reading. Stay tuned.
Posted by: MikeM at
06:14 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
You forgot the final consequence:
(6) Eventually, the bond market and/or the currency markets destroy the US Government.
Posted by: Kentucky Packrat at April 11, 2011 11:20 PM (xWJGp)
2
Now you know why Obama abstained so much in the Illinois Senate. When you abstain, you never have to admit you were wrong.
Posted by: Don, the Rebel without a Blog at April 12, 2011 09:23 AM (pcZW2)
Posted by: Evan at April 14, 2011 01:13 AM (aKa7l)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 09, 2011
Fathers - Strength Under Fire
Do you ever wake up alone and not know where you are?
You sense a room, slightly cold and roll over in bed to drape your arms across the one whose form felt like gold in your hand, nuzzling the short, soft hair there at the base of the skull. But there is only cold air, and it dawns on you that side of the bed is still empty. That realization rushes you into wakefulness with a sense of fear and loss that hovers constant in the corners of the dark and you wish you weren't alone. It's not much different than when you were a little kid and you wake from a nightmare of monsters and homework, calling out to a parent who rushes to your side to let you know you are safe.
Posted by: Brigid at
05:17 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Posted by: North at April 09, 2011 09:06 PM (rz915)
2
I totally enjoyed this. Very well done.
Posted by: brando at April 09, 2011 10:59 PM (fwqRS)
3
If the old saw is true about a woman picking someone like her Dad then someone will have some mighty big shoes to fill.
Posted by: Larry at April 10, 2011 02:19 AM (f4gk9)
4
Just got off the phone with my Dad. Thanks I needed that. Mine is in his late 70's and he remembered every single story, fall, heartbreak, and wisdom he passed on. He remembers it all, and I am sure your Father does to.
I to hope to some day be the man my Father is.
God Speed.
And
God Bless
Brad.
Posted by: dagamore at April 10, 2011 09:06 AM (PeraN)
5
Hi Brigid,
There is something special about adoptive parents. I was adopted. People thought it odd that I adopted two children but I had the best example. I could do no less. I've never met my biological parents. I pretty much know where to go but I've respected their privacy. Still, I've told every woman who's given a child for adoption just one thing; "Thank you!" Thank you, Brigid.
Jerry
Posted by: Gerald "Jerry" Dreisewerd at April 10, 2011 08:48 PM (IpU2t)
6
Thank you all. Yes, Larry, I do look for someone like Dad. There are a few out there, thankfully.
Posted by: Brigid at April 11, 2011 06:53 AM (GUB7j)
7
Wow - just freaking wow. Amazingly well written and incredibly touching. I'm not misting up - it's just something in my eye - I swear.
Steven
Posted by: L. Steven Beene II at April 11, 2011 04:40 PM (zNgZK)
8
Tom:
Because your comment was in violation of our comment policy--it was rude and insulting and did not in any way address any issue raised--it has been deleted. You are always welcome to visit and comment, but only if you do so in a civil manner.
Posted by: mikemc at April 13, 2011 06:27 PM (4eWOf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Obama and Energy
The nice folks at Pajamas Media have been kind enough to publish an essay on Mr. Obama and the falsity of his energy policy. It's called Obama's New Energy Policy: A Lesson In Stealth Socialism. I explore Mr. Obama's true political philosophy and how he has applied it in ObamaCare, and how he is applying it in domestic energy policy. To read it, go here.
Posted by: MikeM at
11:20 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
April 08, 2011
Me? Own A Gun? Article 4: What To Buy?
In this installment I’ll discuss the primary differences, advantages and disadvantages between revolvers and semi-automatic handguns. In the final installment, which will be posted in a few days, I’ll get into caliber choices, methods of carrying, and several other items of interest. I’m making the assumption that readers contemplating what I’ve had to say in the first three installments (here, here and here) intend to do more than purchase a firearm exclusively for home defense. After all, our lives don’t lose their value outside the home, and one is, depending on a variety of factors, arguably more rather than less likely to need to defend their life outside their home.
I’m also going to be writing for those whose knowledge of firearms and related terminology is limited. As the information I’m providing here is covered in a wide variety of magazines--print and online--and books, I’ll be providing primarily an overview rather than an exhaustive exposition of the issues. I do recommend as a basic text The Complete Book of Handgunning by Chuck Taylor. It’s available through Amazon and other sources, and contains the fundamentals necessary to develop essential basic skills. Full disclosure: I am one of a relative few certified as an instructor by Taylor’s American Small Arms Academy, and I am also certified by the NRA as a range safety and handgun instructor.
Posted by: MikeM at
11:07 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Mike,
Glad to see your next post in the series. I've always thought that when I do carry I would go with a semi-automatic if only for ease of concealment over revolvers. I figure that if I have to conceal my weapon as I carry why add to the challenge of keeping it hidden?
Also, a question that may pertain more to the next installment but asked here so I don't forget. I currently do not own a handgun although I have shot one a few times (no more than a dozen) and I also have yet to take my CCW class (probably in May). I have a friend who has offered to lend me his handgun for the class and although having checked with the class they only require you to bring a gun (not necessarily yours) would you recommend purchasing, practicing, and getting familiar with your own specific weapon before taking the class? Or does it not matter?
Looking forward to your wrap-up article,
Mark
Posted by: Mark at April 09, 2011 11:51 PM (mgwq6)
2
Mike
Thank you for the article. It was very useful.
I chose to carry a S&W 642 instead of a autoloader because I felt that it was easier to carry than a autoloader in a caliber of roughly equivalent power and inherently safer than an autoloader with one in the chamber. It is hammerless, so snagging is not an issue. I generally carry using an inside the waistband holster, but sometimes just drop it into my jacket pocket when going out to walk the dog at night. Very simple and easy. No speedloader or extra ammunition--the probabilities don't seem to add up enough to justify the hassle.
However, it is NOT very accurate when I shoot it and stings like a *(^# as well (I cannot imagine shooting a .357 in a form factor that small). At 10 yards, I can readily put 5 rounds center mass--any farther away and it is more for scaring the crows. I put 50 rounds through it every month, then put it away to shoot a .40 or a 9mm for fun.
On balance, after shooting nearly 20 sidearms, I felt that this was the best concealed carry weapon for me. just my $0.02 worth.
Posted by: iconoclast at April 10, 2011 02:36 AM (NS9yf)
3
Dear Mark:
Welcome back and thanks for reading! Before I get into specifics, may I ask what you're planning to buy?
Posted by: mikemc at April 10, 2011 02:12 PM (4eWOf)
4
Mike,
I'm really not sure. The few times I have shot a hand gun have been either the Glock 17 or the Beretta 92FS. I enjoyed both but I can't say I liked one over the other.
Posted by: Mark at April 10, 2011 05:28 PM (jDCbw)
5
Dear Mark:
Ah! So you're in the market for a full-sized 9mm? If concealment is your primary concern, I'd suggest the Glock 19 (15 round magazine), or the Glock 26 (10 round). While the 17 is a fine handgun, the 19 is more easily concealed, and of course, the 26 is very easy to conceal. The Beretta is a fine handgun, but generally heavier and more complex than Glock.
As you can tell, I'm a Glock fan, but that comes from decades of shooting and carrying experience, including just about every type and a great many models of the handguns currently on the market. I've found Glocks to be utterly reliable, easy to clean, accurate, and very, very rugged. Glocks are also the simplest semiautos on the market. But enough on that.
If you have a good idea what you'd like to buy and have the money, by all means, buy the weapon and familiarize yourself with it prior to the class. You obviously intend to buy a handgun, so why not do it as soon as possible? You'll be much more confident for the class and ready thereafter.
Posted by: mikemc at April 10, 2011 06:26 PM (4eWOf)
6
Mike,
I'm actually not sure what I am looking for. My
criteria would be the following:
Semi-automatic.
Easy to conceal.
Reasonably priced ammo.
Also, although it would be primarily my weapon and I would carry it I would also want my wife to be able to shoot it.
Posted by: Mark at April 10, 2011 09:44 PM (mgwq6)
7
Dear Mark:
OK, a bit of a teaser for the final installment, wherein you'll find that I essentially recommend the Glock 26, and reveal that 9mm ammunition is substantially cheaper than any of the other popular calibers, except, of course, .22LR, which is not appropriate for your application. My wife also carries the 26 and is quite fond of it. One of the great strengths of Glocks is that they are like revolvers, if you pull the trigger, they'll go bang--very simple. But because of their ingenious trigger and internal safeties, they are also one of the safest firearms on the market.
Posted by: mikemc at April 10, 2011 11:11 PM (4eWOf)
8
Thanks. I look forward to the final installment.
Posted by: Mark at April 10, 2011 11:52 PM (mgwq6)
9
Mark,
Other pistols similar to the Glock include the Springfield Armory XD compact 9mm and the Smith & Wesson M&P 9C pistols. Check those out as well, as the ergonomics are slightly different on each pistol.
Also, when using a marginal caliber such as the 9mm, you are going to need to make sure that you select modern defensive rounds--primarily hollowpoints in the 115-124 grain range--to increase the pistol's stopping power. Luckily, 9mm bulk FMJ is cheap enough you can afford to practice with it on a regular basis.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at April 11, 2011 07:40 AM (HEM2E)
10
I look forward to the rest of this series. The more neophyte shooters get their CCW's, the more such advice is needed!
IMHO, the biggest mistake made by most people in buying a CCW handgun is buying too big. If it's not reasonably comfortable to carry, you won't carry it. If it's not reasonably comfortable to shoot, you won't practice with it. And if you can't consistently hit things with it, the utility is vastly diminished.
Posted by: Tully at April 11, 2011 10:51 AM (dhKXL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 07, 2011
Media Suppresses Leftist Violence (Again)
Michael Thomas describes himself as a liberal Democrat and communist. The police say he's mentally unstable, but that's redundant.
A Portland man charged with sending threatening letters to Gov. Paul LePage admitted to agents that he sent those and other threatening letters to national political figures, including Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and U.S. Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, according to testimony Wednesday in U.S. District Court.
Authorities also found a gun and an ammunition clip in Michael Thomas' desk drawer when he was arrested Friday, FBI Special Agent Pamela Flick testified; and Thomas told her that if they had showed up later, he would have launched a shootout with police.
Thomas claims he would have carried out his death threats if he had the means. In other words, he had the intent of becoming the next Jared Lee Laughner, just not the ability to carry it out.
Because all of his targets were Republicans, and Thomas is a self-described Democrat and communist, the MSM won't give this story the front-page treatment they would if the situation was reversed.
It's far too important for them to protect the narrative.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:40 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Liberal Democrat, communist and mentally unstable: three time loser.
Posted by: zhombre at April 07, 2011 05:14 PM (axoU4)
2
That it is... the narrative CANNOT be impinged... sigh...
Posted by: Old NFO at April 07, 2011 08:11 PM (bVxWR)
3
Remember when the "leftist media" gave all that front-page treatment to the Byron Williams story? You know, the ex-felon and Glen Beck-devotee who had a huge shootout with the Oakland police while on his way to kill members of the SF ACLU and the Tides Foundation.
Yeah, I don't remember that coverage either. Especially on Fox News who, you know, employed Beck at the time.
Posted by: Zog at April 09, 2011 05:20 PM (6cNb/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 06, 2011
Quick Takes, April 07, 2011
ITEM: It is a mark of the character of the American people that this kind of story will touch their hearts and bring a tear to their eyes. Go here, and see what I mean.
ITEM: A Trip Down Memory Lane. Why are we currently at a budget impasse? Is it those evil Republicans who want to kill children and old people with their “radical” spending cuts? Not quite. Rewind to October, 2010 when the budget for this fiscal year was due. Ah, those heady days of absolute Democrat control of the White House and both houses of Congress, yet they refused to pass a budget for this fiscal year. Why? Because they were sufficiently aware of their debilitating spending addiction to know that any budget they passed would elect even more Republicans in November. Thus they set the stage for continuing resolution after continuing resolution and the government shutdown (tell me again why that’s a bad thing?) looming at midnight Friday. Keep this in mind the next time a Democrat tells you that they are protecting the public against the evils of rational spending and avoiding a global economic shutdown.
ITEM: Is This Cool Or What? Department: ABC News (here) reports on the XM-25, a weapon currently being field tested in Afghanistan. The weapon—troops call it “The Punisher”—is a programmable, semi-automatic 25mm grenade launcher. Equipped with a combination day/night/laser ranging sight, soldiers can set the smart round it fires to explode at a predetermined distance. Terrorists hiding behind a thick mortar wall? Lase the distance, set the round to explode at that distance + three feet, aim above the wall and fire. The round will travel directly to that point and explode directly above the terrorists. The weapon is still under development and all of the types of ammunition are not yet perfected and widely available, but the troops who have used it in combat reportedly do not want to give it up. It is this kind of American ingenuity some despise. The tragedy is that many of them are American politicians.
ITEM: Perhaps the best advertising strategy for the 2012 presidential election is to let Mr. Obama indict himself. Use his actions, his words, his stated intentions and their results to convince people that he must be a one-term president. It should be ridiculously easy as there has never been a president who has talked at the American people in such shallow depth, yet with such clock-like regularity and such tsunami-like volume. For a good look at what just might work, at least for people who have not had Obama implants secreted under their skin on the Obama mothership, go here.
ITEM: Tales Of The Religion Of Peace, Department: From Fox News (here) comes the story of Muslim riots in Afghanistan that in two days (April 1 and 2) have left 13 dead, including seven foreign UN employees. In addition more than 50 have been injured. Yes, once again, the most peaceful religion on Earth has murdered many innocents, including fellow Muslims. Why? Because Afghan president Hamid Karzai announced and condemned the actions of one, small Florida church in burning a copy of the Koran on March 20. And Mr. Obama thinks it’s possible to negotiate with such people because...? I guess that historic Muslim outreach speech in Cairo didn’t go as far as Afghanistan--or Egypt--or Syria--or Iran--or Libya, or, well, anywhere else in the Muslim world, but that’s hope and change for ya!
ITEM: In The Throw Away The Key! Department, from Fox News (here) we learn of two parents in Michigan who sicced their seven year old son on another boy. When a 73 year old crossing guard tried to stop the attack, the parents attacked him. They’ve been arrested and charged with assault and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Well, yeah...
ITEM: In the “He Did WHAT?! Department comes news (here) that Mr. Obama, in a stunning display of the kind of military acumen that has made him the Commander-In-Chief that he is, has withdrawn American attack planes, more or less, sort of so that NATO--which is actually, really us--can kind of take over. This military move, worthy of Sun Tzu’s much dumber brother Dim Duk, has occurred at the same time that Qaddafi’s forces have begun a serious push to eradicate the rebel forces, and have begun to run up a significant casualty toll. Senators on the Armed Services Committee characterized the move as “odd,” “troubling” and “unnerving,” and Senator John McCain told Defense Secretary Robert Gates “your timing is exquisite.” He was not delivering a compliment. Gates allowed that the situation was “unfortunate,” but said that our grounded aircraft could be recalled if things became so bad for the rebels that it was necessary. Senator Lindsay Graham said: "The idea that the AC-130s and the A-10s and American air power is grounded unless the place goes to hell is just so unnerving that I can't express it adequately.” And critics have called Mr. Obama’s Libya not-war policy “incoherent.” What were they thinking? It’s perfectly coherent in an utter lack of coherence sort of way.
ITEM: The Everything is Under Control! Department (here): "There is a perception that the border is worse now than it ever has been," DHS Secretary Napolitano said at the El Paso border crossing last week. "That is wrong. The border is better now than it ever has been." Unfortunately for Napolitano, and incidentally, the entire nation, Arizona’s Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever has a differing opinion. “The senior supervisor agent is telling me about how their mission is now to scare people back. He said, ‘I had to go back to my guys and tell them not to catch anybody, that their job is to chase people away. … They were not to catch anyone, arrest anyone. Their job was to set up posture, to intimidate people, to get them to go back.”
Jeffery Self, commander of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Joint Field Command in Arizona, said in a written statement. “The claim that Border Patrol supervisors have been instructed to underreport or manipulate our statistics is unequivocally false,” Hmm. Wait a minute. Mr. Self didn’t actually address what Sheriff Dever said, did he? I’m sure everything is completely under control. After all, Janet Napolitano said so!
ITEM: The Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars With the Greatest Care! Department: From Hot Air (here) comes news of the enormous sculpture of a fairy on the back of a toad which lights up and “gurgles sounds of nature.” The sculpture, to be placed at the Defense Department’s Mark Center in Alexandria, Virginia to open this fall, costs a mere $600,000, pocket change to the Federal Government. Army Corps of Engineers officials, responding to charges of waste and, well, idiocy, have noted that the decision to build the enormous toad and fairy, which is due on April 1 (talk about irony), can’t be put off because it would “impact completion” of the project. I don’t know what all the fuss is about. After all, it’s not even a million bucks, and I can’t think of anything more inspiring to people working to help defend America than the kind of patriotic symbolism embodied by a ten foot fairy riding an enormous toad. After all, wasn’t it just such a vision that inspired George Washington to cross the Potomac in a wooden shoe while chopping down a cherry tree and lying to his father? It wasn’t? Oh. This is an April Fool's joke, right? Even the Feds couldn't be this dopey? Right? Right?
ITEM: And in the “So Ironic It Hurts!” Department, comes this story from Hot Air (here) about Mr. Obama recently receiving an award for—wait for it…transparency! And the best part is that he locked all reporters out of the secret White House ceremony where the award was bestowed! You can’t make this stuff up, folks.
ITEM: So Now The Republicans Want to Kill Children, Eh? Rajiv, Shas, USAID Administrator told a House subcommittee:
“… the budget plan, which would cut $61 billion in federal spending, would lead to the deaths of 30,000 kids in a malaria control program that would have to be scaled back, 24,000 from a lack of immunizations and 16,000 from a lack of skilled attendants at birth.” "’There's a way to do this that does not have to cost lives and we're very focused and very much want to work with the committee to identify a path forward that can allow us to be effective at doing so,’ he said. Shah is seeking $59.5 billion in funding for his agency, up 22 percent, or $10.7 billion, from the current level.”
Well, when you put it that way… Perhaps the Dems can come up with how many children will be killed per dollar of budget cuts. Any bets? One? 2.37? 18.82? Go here for the entire sad story and contact your Republican legislator and tell them to kill as many children as possible.
NOTE TO THE IRONY CHALLENGED/MANDATORY POLITICAL CORRECTNESS DISCLAIMER: That last comment was satirical. I am not, in fact, in favor of killing children and I am not, in fact, actually telling you to tell legislators to kill children. However, I am fond of Jonathan Swift’s modest proposal about eating them.
ITEM: We’re so far underwater in national debt that we can’t see sunlight, so one wonders on which pressing, absolutely vital national priority does Mr. Obama want to spend even more money? Buying more land for parks and conservation. The federal government already owns about 1/3 of all American lands, and Mr. Obama (here) wants to double spending next year to $900 million dollars. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski has pointed out that the Feds cannot afford to maintain the land they already own, and would have to sell, rather than buy, land to properly maintain it. Hmm. If I was broke and owned property I couldn’t afford to maintain, wouldn’t I sell that property? But then again, I’m not Barack Obama, am I?
Another thought: How does this square with Mr. Obama’s recent speech claiming to be all about expanding American energy production? Does he want more land to open it to exploration and energy production? Isn’t private land already open to exploration and energy production? Something doesn’t smell quite right, and I’m sure it doesn’t smell remotely like oil.
ITEM: Epic Fail Department: Remember all of Mr. Obama’s bold outreach initiatives? Remember the way he was going to utterly transform not only America, but make the world love us? Remember how having a black, sort-of-Muslim-when-it’s-convenient-and-don’t-you-dare-call-me-Muslim-even-though-my-middle-name-is-about-as-muslim-as-it-gets President would change the way every nation dealt with America? How’s all of that working out? Go here for John Hannah’s take. My take? Mr. Obama couldn’t have made a worse hash of the world if he tried, and I’m not entirely sure he didn’t--and isn’t.
ITEM: Read the article here to discover one of the greatest tragedies of modern times. Oh, the humanity! Yes, California state legislators, in a state that is about to, economically and perhaps not metaphorically speaking, slide into the Pacific Ocean, may actually—gasp!—lose—wailing and gnashing of teeth—their taxpayer paid luxury automobiles! I may eat some organic vegetables in protest of the obvious violation of universal human rights such cruel deprivation would constitute. And yes, CA is the only state that provides state-subsidized rides for state legislators. And it's bankrupt. And it just elected a man it fondly (?!) calls "Governor Moonbeam" again(?!). Perhaps there’s a lesson in there somewhere? Discuss.
ITEM: Louis Renault Award of the Week: From Fox News (here) comes the tragic tale of Attorney General Eric Holder, a man who works tirelessly for his people, making a petulant April 4 appearance to announce that some of the most vile terrorists of the century will not be allowed to have star-studded media-circus trials in the Big Apple. No, NYC will be denied the world-wide attention, astronomical expense, disruption and terrorist targeting that is—according to Mr. Holder and Mr. Obama--its natural right. And it’s all the more tragic, according to Mr. Holder, because he guarantees they’d be convicted, so let’s get on with the fair, impartial trials and show the world how fair our justice system really is. But that’s not what makes me shocked, shocked!, no. I know you won’t be able to believe it either. It’s the fault of Congress and those darned American people that Mr. Holder won’t get his way. Awwww. Once again, the people--the bastards--have spoken.
ITEM: Louis Renault Award of the Week #II: I am shocked, shocked! to learn that the Nevada chapter of ACORN has pleaded guilty to one count of violating election laws in Las Vegas, NV during the 2008 campaign. ACORN, which is now defunct (I really can’t get tired of writing that!), is almost certainly operating under other names. The mainstream media might figure that out sometime after the next presidential election--or not. Go to Fox News (here) for the rest of the story. Hope. Change. Nation-wide election fraud. Community Organizing.
ITEM: From Hot Air (here) comes the news that Former Speaker of the House (I absolutely never get tired of writing that!) Nancy Pelosi is now saying that some budget bill or something or other that Republicans may or may not be proposing will make six million seniors starve to death. Sigh. On the April 5th O’Reilly Factor, John Stossel reported that his staff called Pelosi’s office and they had no idea what bill Pelosi was talking about or where she was getting her figures. Imagine that. This woman was third in line for the presidency. Contact your Republican legislators immediately and ask that they make eating old people legal. Starting with Nancy Pelosi. For the required disclaimer, see the “ So Now The Republicans Want to Kill Children, Eh?” item above and substitute “old people” for “children.” Thanks.
ITEM: I’m All For Free Speech, But…: From Hot Air (here) comes the predictably erratic Senator Lindsay Graham who says: “I wish we could hold people accountable for their actions, but under free speech, you can’t.” He speaks, of course of the killing of UN workers and fellow Afghani Muslims by Afghan adherents of the religion of peace following the burning of a Koran by an obscure Florida minister. Graham, who is actually a military (reserve) lawyer(?!), thinks that the fact that he, and apparently General David Petraeus--according to Graham--would like to ban Koran burning overrides the First Amendment because without people like the general, there would be no First Amendment. Well, I’m a teacher, and without people like me, there would be no writ…
ITEM: Delicious Irony Department: From Rob over at PACNW Righty (here) we discover that in the very heart of leftist, Global Warming, tree-hugging territory, California, The Sierra Nevada Mountains have near-record snowfalls, with some 61 feet of snow. But of course, 61 feet of snow is obvious evidence of global warming. So is rain, hail, night, day, too-tight jeans, Victoria’s Secret, little yappy dogs, Koran burning and Nancy Pelosi. Discuss.
ITEM: Who Says There Are No Happy Endings? Department: If you’d like a smile on your face and a tear in your eye, go here. Oh yes, and be glad you’re an American, one of hundreds of millions of people who would care about something so simple, so common, yet so touching.
And on that touching note, thanks for stopping by, and I'll see you again next Thursday, same bat-time, same bat-channel!
Posted by: MikeM at
10:17 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Thanks for all the great "items". I always check your blog first on Thursdays.
Posted by: Secesh at April 07, 2011 07:38 PM (NDH+f)
2
Dear Secesh:
Thanks! We're glad you're enjoying it.
Mike
Posted by: mikemc at April 07, 2011 10:56 PM (eBZkn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 05, 2011
Fiscal Malpractice
In recent weeks, America’s fiscal crisis has, day by day, worsened and the stark realities we face have been made more and more clear. Yet in the face of disaster, Congressional Democrats scream about cutting a few billions, accusing Republicans of wanting to kill 70,000 children when we are facing deficits in the tens of trillions. President Obama has been essentially absent, apparently adopting the childish tactic of ignoring the deficit in the hope that it will simply go away and stop bothering him. If that was all that he did--or didn’t do--it would be bad enough, but of late, he has taken a number of policy steps that clearly indicate that he has no idea of economics, or simply could care less.
Mr. Obama has announced (here) his executive order to replace all 600,000 federal vehicles with “advanced technology” vehicles by 2015. “Advanced technology,” of course, means hybrids and electric vehicles such as the Chevy Volt, which is essentially a needly complex plug-in pseudo hybrid retailing for $41,000, but costing as much as $65,000. The costs of this bit of economic lunacy are staggering. Every Volt purchased will cost more than double the price of a comparable sedan and will also require a huge investment in charging stations at federal installations across the nation. Even hybrids commonly cost thousands more than comparable conventional vehicles.
Mr. Obama has also announced his intention (here) to double--to $900 million dollars--the Federal Government’s budget for purchasing privately owned land, ostensibly for conservation. The Feds already own 1/3 of all land in America and, according to Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, cannot come close to properly maintaining it, an assertion many Americans who have recently visited a national park can confirm. In fact, the only way the Government can possibly afford to properly maintain the land it now owns would be to sell large portions of it to raise the money necessary to maintain the rest.
There are a great many additional examples of Mr. Obama’s utter lack of adult seriousness regarding debt reduction, but these are illustrative. Certainly, there are political motivations in these two situations. Mr. Obama clearly intends to buy large numbers of Chevy Volts, in effect, to create a market where one could not otherwise exist. In doing this, he continues to put money in union coffers, and in turn, his 2012 campaign chest. It is no coincidence that Mr. Obama’s crony and advisor, Jeffery Immelt, president of General Electric, has committed GE to buying 12,000 Volts. It is likewise an amazing non-coincidence that GE manufactures the charging stations that will be necessary to support fleets of electric vehicles with limited utility and even more limited range (about 25 miles in real world experience). Mr. Obama has also recently expressed his support for an all-of-the-above energy strategy, but everything he has done to date indicates just the opposite. Putting more land under direct government control almost certainly means that much more land closed to coal, oil, nuclear and natural gas development and production.
Any rational adult serious about cutting spending would actually cut spending. Mr. Obama is manifestly not rational or serious in his non-pursuit of fiscal sobriety. But for a man who non-fights non-wars, we should be non-surprised. Unfortunately, Mr. Obama’s lack of attention to American’s welfare will result, and sooner rather than later, in all too real consequences.
Posted by: MikeM at
06:03 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
It is overly charitable to conclude that Zero "has
no idea of economics, or simply could care less."
Everything he does contributes to the development
and exacerbation of the looming fiscal crisis. A
Manchurian Candidate could hardly do worse for the
country. What reason is there, really, to assume
that Zero is not acting with informed intent, his
own or his master(s), to destroy the economy?
Posted by: Yarrl Dleifsarb at April 06, 2011 02:35 AM (qYH4w)
2
Not to mention that if anyone would propose using the land for wind power even a deaf old fart like myself would hear the screeching.
Posted by: Bob at April 06, 2011 04:33 PM (2hFse)
3
Speaking of windpower. Have you seen the blog ads saying that windpower is 30% of all new energy. Yes! that's New energy.
Posted by: davod at April 07, 2011 04:58 PM (C5U9L)
4
Dear Davod:
New energy indeed. The most common figure I've seen is that even if it is developed to the levels many of its proponents desire, wind power will never produce more than 2% of our energy needs, and that only intermittently. A recent long term British study indicates that wind power has produced far, far less then even the minimal projections of its proponent there. Thirty percent? Perhaps in an alternate, very consistently windy reality...
Posted by: mikemc at April 07, 2011 06:26 PM (eBZkn)
5
I'm sure you all are aware that the Volt is an external combustion car, running on coal power, minus the 10 to 20 percent efficiency loss in the wires to your house.
Well, that's if you're travelling less than, say 60 MPH, where the electrics run out so fast that the gas motor is used anyway.
And did I mention the total lack of heating? Well, it's not total - there are seat heaters - just wear your gloves, so your hands don't freeze to the wheel... and hope the defroster works...but then, there goes your electric range, right down the toilet. But remember, it pollutes less running on gas than coal...
I won't even mention summer.
Stupit twit. Obama, I mean. Electric cars have been the coming thing for 100 years now, still no better than then.
Posted by: Bill Johnson at April 09, 2011 11:42 PM (9X1+H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 02, 2011
The Erik Scott Case, Update 10.3, Stealth Legislation and Misdirection
Since the posting of Update 10.2, additional information relating to the issues it raised has come to light in the local Las Vegas media (here). Officers Mark Hatten and Timothy English, who were placed on administrative suspension following the taser death of Anthony Jones have been put back to work in unspecified jobs that allow no public contact. In addition, most of the approximately one dozen officers similarly suspended over the last five months after fatal shootings or in-custody deaths have also been placed in similar, unspecified duties.
Kathy O’Connor, Sheriff Doug Gillespie’s Chief of Staff said:
“There’s really no reason we need to leave these officers sitting at home. We’re just looking to be as efficient as we possibly can.”
O’Connor also observed that the practice of keeping officers off duty until after a coroner’s inquest was of long standing and common in law enforcement. She characterized the practice as giving the officers time for counseling and emotional recovery.
According to Clark County Assistant Coroner John Fundenberg, inquests will take place from four to six months after an incident. Two decades ago, they often began in as little as two weeks, and in recent years, within six weeks. Commenting on the changes in the process wrought by the Clark County Commission, Fundenberg, who has apparently had his sense of irony surgically removed as a condition of employment, said:
“People didn’t believe the district attorney acted as an impartial party in the past. I disagreed with that, but they were accused of being partial.”
Multiple cases awaiting a coroner’s inquest will have to wait until late May, at the earliest, though Fundenberg hopes they will be caught up by the end of the year.
Chris Collins, President of the Las Vegas Police Protective Association--the police union--did not depart from the union line. He said that participation in inquests would open officers to civil liability. Collins claimed that four unnamed attorneys came to that conclusion.
“We warned them, if you will, that if they made this process so adversarial we would not participate.” Collins added “It’s a shame. The process before worked. It was open to the public. And now, in my opinion, the tail wagged the dog and the small vocal minority has taken away what was once an open process.”
Posted by: MikeM at
08:19 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
And this has import for the Scott case how? So now you have officers declining to participate resulting in less information being presented to the inquest juries. Is that an improvement?
Posted by: Federale at April 05, 2011 01:37 PM (PWWdd)
2
Of course!
The "small vocal minority" has succeeded in changing the rules and have achieved their goals. The fact that it will reduce transparency, is not a major concern.
You see, it's a symbolic validation that the inquest was rigged, fixed, collusion, a scheme and that's how they rationalize away the jury's results.
If the inquest become an adversarial process, should not the county provide Officers with representation (if they expect them to attend) so they may do that "on the advice of counsel...." stuff?
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 05, 2011 04:27 PM (hGqbZ)
3
Dear Buck Turgidson:
Reading your comments--and by the way, welcome back--I'm tempted to wonder if you actually read the same article I wrote. Transparency will be reduced only if the union has its way and police officers are allowed to refuse to do their duty and testify to their official actions, or if Nevada legislators change the law to allow the Las Vegas DA to simply do away with inquests entirely as he pleases.
As to rationalizing away the inquest jury's results, I'm not doing that, but merely reporting on the explanations of some of the jurors for a result they felt was unjust but had no choice but to render.
As I mentioned, any officer may take the 5th and may engage an attorney at will. The problem occurs when officers refuse to do their duty. Police officers know that any legal proceeding is, of necessity and by design, adversarial. May I safely assume that you don't support police officers deciding when or if they will testify in court? Do you agree that officers taking the 5th are implying that they have broken the law in the discharge of their official duties? Do you agree that this is a bad thing?
As always, thanks for your comments.
Posted by: mikemc at April 05, 2011 08:39 PM (eBZkn)
4
Dear Mike:
One the surface, one would expect our Police Officers to cooperate with all criminal investigations. However, that's as a witness or investigator. If the possibility exist you may become a suspect, should not the Police Officer have the same 'rights' as we civilians without being disparaged with that 'what do you have to hide' pretense?
Much like an internal Police investigation of a policy violation where the Officer MUST cooperate or be fired. If at some point the investigation turns criminal, whatever was learned from the required/forced testimony from the Officer CAN NOT be used against them in criminal court. Another source of that information (if possible) must be developed.
Officers SHOULD be required to participate in the public inquest. But if it includes a adversarial Q&A, information learned beyond the postulation of the Police investigation should not be usable in a civil proceeding against that Officer.
Tell me the truth, Mike, (and don't spare my feelings) would you be championing this cause if, over time, a few more 'not justified' verdicts were offered?
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 06, 2011 06:13 AM (hGqbZ)
5
In the Scott case, there are no timeless principles at stake, but Mike's war on the LVMPD. And he is using a drug addict as his Rosa Parks. The only principle is riding this hobby horse to death for Mike's own benefit. That is the only principle at stake. Some bloggers got to the top using a specific issue. And this is CY's attempt to make the big time.
But despite Mike's efforts, it is not working out. And since Mike is basically a one-trick pony, he is sticking to it. Otherwise his commentary and news is on the 4th tier of bloggers.
Perhaps he was shooting to be the next Jack Dunphy, but he is not even close. Jack has real insight into a street cops life and law enforcement in the naked city.
Martin Luther King was smart, he rejected several people who wanted to challenge segregation on the Montgomery bus sytem. He waited for, or more accurately, recruited Rosa Parks because she was respectable. However Mike chose the drug addict Eric Scott. A major error.
Of course the problem is that there are not many Rosa Parks around to be arrested or shot by the police. Policing has changed, some for the better, some for the worse, but few agencies are shooting alot of innocent people. Even the ATFE has stopped burning down churches and shooting people down like dogs. Of course, Jamie Gorelick may change that when she becomes FBI Director, but that is yet to happen.
Perhaps Mike will find his Rosa Parks, but it ain't Eric Scott. And his obession with this case is starting to become tiresome. The only real question is why PJ keeps publishing him. He hasn't taken off. But Mike is more likely to tilt at windmills than find a damsel in distress to rescue.
Posted by: Federale at April 06, 2011 11:24 AM (PWWdd)
6
Dear Buck Turgidson:
You are correct in suggesting that police officers have all of the rights accorded criminal suspects--including the right to remain silent--and I've made precisely that point in this update and in Update 10.2. We agree. However, these rights do not protect them from adverse administrative actions. They can be fired if they violate policies and refuse to do their jobs, another point I've made repeatedly.
In an inquest, or any other judicial proceeding, officers are virtually always subjected to adversarial questioning, if not directly designed to prove they are criminally culpable, then certainly designed to suggest that they are incompetent, prejudiced, biased against a defendant, etc. Of course, if they are criminally culpable, then they may invoke their rights, as we've agreed, but if they do, for example, take the 5th, they have placed themselves under suspicion of having committed crimes, as I've also pointed out.
As to information usable in a civil proceeding, the trial record of any court proceeding, criminal or otherwise (absent a specific statute to the contrary, such as juvenile matters, mental health hearings, etc.), is commonly considered the property and legitimate interest of the public unless a judge, upon due consideration, seals it for some legitimate reason. Officer's inquest testimony may therefore generally be used in a civil proceeding. In addition, because civil proceedings do not involve anyone's life or liberty, different standards on the admission of evidence apply. At the moment, I don't see any reason why an officer's inquest testimony should not be usable in other trial venues, but I'm making the assumption that said officer is acting professionally and within the law. If they're not, I don't have a great deal of sympathy for them; not none, but not a great deal. You may of course, disagree or have more sympathy, but the law remains.
As to my interest in this case, it's quite simple. It's compelling because, as I've said several times, it plays out like a reverse textbook of police ethics and procedures. It illustrates exactly what professional officers should not do in a great many facets of police work. Even if one disagrees with my current theory of the case--which I will change if and when the evidence warrants--I suspect that you can agree that so much of what the police did is at the least, incompetent, and certainly does not do Metro or the police profession credit. As I mentioned in one update, when we fail to call out those who dishonor the profession, we do no service to those who honor it every day. The fact that Metro has been exonerated in only one of some 200 cases in a decade only serves to raise my suspicions. If the ratio was more within the realm of probability, my suspicions would indeed be lowered, but considering all of the other factors, I would likely still follow this case due to it's unique (in many ways) elements, elements which include Metro's abysmal reputation and the general reputation of Las Vegas for lawlessness.
So, for the foreseeable future, I'll continue to follow the case. I appreciate your comments and civility. Thanks and be well!
Mike
Posted by: mikemc at April 06, 2011 06:33 PM (eBZkn)
7
Dear Federale:
I believe I've mentioned our policy regarding ad hominem attacks in the past, but for the benefit of our readers, I'll take the time, this time only. Your most recent comment is very similar to an earlier comment. Those who resort to ad hominem attacks are generally considered by fair-minded people to be out of rhetorical ammunition. Violate our comment policy in the future, and your comments will be deleted.
Considering your expressed opinion, it seems surprising that you continue to read the Scott series. Surely you're aware that you are not required to read it, and that you are free to read those authors whose writing you find to be more authoritative and pleasing? In the meantime, I'm content to let our readers decide whether my writing is of value to them, as those who publish my work elsewhere are also free to decide. In the meantime, I'm not giving up my day job--ever.
So there is no misunderstanding, I'll leave your comment up so that readers know what I'm talking about. Please visit and read as you please. However, ad hominem attacks, rudeness and uncivil discourse are not welcome here. I encourage you to comment, but only if you will limit yourself to dealing with the issues we raise in a polite manner.
Posted by: mikemc at April 06, 2011 06:46 PM (eBZkn)
8
I read these posts regarding Eric Scott because I find your opinion frightening and ill-informed. I think that the readers need to know the truth about Eric Scott, he was a drug addled danger to himself and others.
I think your readers must find it interesting that you have, in your Scott posts, used ad hominem attacks numerous employees of the fire and police departments of Las Vegas, but when you find your self the subject of criticism, you immediately make the same cry that the left did after the Arizona shootings; such attacks become beyond the pale and unacceptable.
If you ban me, so be it. My comments have been trenchant and biting, but not beyond any pale.
Commenting on your possible motivation for the disservice you provide with wild unsubstantiated conspiracy theories may be harsh, but as someone who served in law enforcement, you must know that criticism should not be that painful for you. Sort of like sticks and stones....
But, it is your site and do what you may. Just remember the harsh and damning allegations you have made against others and a man should be able to take some strong words.
But if I have offended you, in the spirit of Christian love, I apologize if your feelings were hurt. Yes, and I mean that truly, but also with a bit of sarcasm, because I think you should be able to take it as well as dish it out.
Posted by: Federale at April 07, 2011 10:47 PM (7xqyd)
9
Dear Federale:
Apologies offered with sarcasm are hardly apologies, but no apology is necessary as no feelings are involved, hurt or otherwise. Bloggers deal in opinion and expect and accept that not everyone will agree with them, as do those who publish here.
As to my making ad hominem attacks, you may wish to review the definition. Suggesting that a given public employee may have done their job poorly, or even broken the law based on reasonable analysis of the available evidence does not fit the definition. If I called such people names or impugned their intelligence, that would be a different matter, but that has not been the case.
The issue remains that you have violated our commentary policy, nothing more. It would be appreciated if you did not do so in the future, particularly if you wish to continue to comment here.
Posted by: mikemc at April 07, 2011 11:05 PM (eBZkn)
10
Dear Mike:
Thank you for your informative response. We agree on much, Mike, however you are wrong in labeling Officers contemptible for exercising ('ah-ha...you must have something to hid') any of their 'rights'. To show you have 'nothing to hid', would Mike allow the Police or Federal Agents to search your home without a warrant? Should it be wrong for that BATF Agent, who asked, to identify you as mistrustful for merely invoking your 'rights'?
There is nothing immoral with our Officers protecting themselves from cabalist type slurs and deceitful litigation because someone didn't agree with the outcome or protocol of the sanctioned investigation.
BTW, Federale is correct. Could you not have pick a better case than Scott, to proclaim a supposedly faulty system?
Posted by: Buck Turgidson at April 08, 2011 02:23 PM (hGqbZ)
11
I stand with the Thin Grey Line.
Do they have plans? Else I'll just boycott Vegas, and tell all my friends...
Despicable scum. That's you, Las Vegas. Each and every one of you who are silent, along with each and every one of you who are culpable. Despicable.
At least, that's the printable part of my opinion of you lowlife scum, Las Vegas police. Don't like my statement? Quit, or off your superiors. Yes, it's killin' time.
Posted by: Bill Johnson at April 09, 2011 11:46 PM (9X1+H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 31, 2011
Together or Alone
"The true measure of the patriot is steadfastness. We all have small moments of wanderlust in us, tearing off on solitary paths that others may not follow, testing limits, testing ourselves. That is the nature of man. Yet when we strive to hold true, to stand firm to our beliefs as free men, together, to carry our weapons and defend our land, the weak become strong, and the wandering hold together as one. For then we are united in something much greater than the elemental whims of man. Together as patriots, we are much more of the courageous and less of the selfish, we are brothers in arms."- Brigid
Posted by: Brigid at
10:19 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
That is absolutely beautiful!
Posted by: North at March 31, 2011 10:59 PM (rz915)
2
That sounds about right.
Is that your Walker?
Posted by: maxx at April 01, 2011 05:35 PM (bFNvP)
3
thank you North.
maxx - the firearm was provided by a friend, Malamute Bill, from out West where I grew up.
Posted by: Brigid at April 02, 2011 08:01 AM (GUB7j)
4
hello! thats a very unusual gun! wats that?
Posted by: zelda at April 02, 2011 12:51 PM (po7od)
5
That's a Walker Colt, the .44 magnum of the 19th century when it didn't explode.
Posted by: richard mcenroe at April 02, 2011 03:30 PM (qvify)
6
Well said, and a beauty of a replica hanging on the nail!
Posted by: Old NFO at April 02, 2011 05:47 PM (DB2/U)
7
I've been looking for a BP revolver. I do like the looks of the Walker.
Posted by: maxx at April 02, 2011 11:30 PM (bFNvP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Quick Takes, March 31, 2011
ITEM: In Maine, a major international crisis is brewing. From Hot Air (here) we discover that Governor Paul LePage has ordered that the state’s Department of Labor building be redecorated after receiving” feedback” that that building isn’t
“perceived as equally receptive to both businesses and workers.” The remodeling, has been removing a 36-foot mural of the state’s labor history and renaming conference rooms which have to date been named for Cesar Chavez (picking fruit in Maine?) and other big labor icons. As one might expect, the usual suspects have proclaimed this provocative, immoral brutality by governor LePage to be, well, provocative and immoral. Even Robert Reich, Clinton Labor Secretary weighed in on the Christian Science Monitor site (here), asking “Are we still in America?” Hmm. So let me see if I have this straight: Anything relating to labor must not only be laudatory toward unions, must not only be displayed and celebrated, but it must remain in place forever, even if potential changes will be essentially neutral. Seems reasonable. But as for Mr. Reich: “The Horror; the horror!” (Repeat in Elmer Fudd voice until everyone in sight is laughing themselves silly)
ITEM: In the SIGNS OF THE APOCALYPSE? Department comes news from the Telegraph of London (here and here) that in an ABC News and People Magazine poll, Forrest Gump was rated the greatest film character of all time. James Bond came in second, followed by Scarlett O’Hara, Hannibal Lecter (?!) and Indiana Jones. The comedy was “Airplane!, followed by “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.”
Check the links for additional categories. “Airplane!” and “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” but of course, but Forrest Gump?
ITEM: What do you do with a person who was a key advisor to AG Janet Reno during the Branch Davidian disaster in Waco, TX, who was singlehandedly responsible for keeping our intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies from communicating, directly leading to 9-11, who served on the 9-11 commission investigating herself, who also worked at Fannie Mae, making 26 million in just seven years, also earning a $800,000+ bonus based on falsified data from its management in 1998, who also received preferred a rate loan from the discredited Countrywide Mortgage? If you’re the Obama administration, you put her--Jamie Gorelick--on the short list for FBI director! Oh, by the way, she has no actual law enforcement experience whatever--unless you count helping to immolate innocent men, women and children--obviously making her the perfect candidate for the Obamites. More here.
ITEM: In the Flying The Sleepy Skies Department, we learn (here) that Reagan National Airport’s control tower went off the air early March 23rd when the sole Air Traffic Controller on duty went to sleep. Despite repeated radio, phone and alarm calls, the ATC remained in sleepy land and two passenger jets had to land without any direction or clearance. FAA officials had no idea that the tower was apparently regularly manned with only a single controller. Of course, it’s all the fault of George W. Bush (here), who when last I checked has not been president for more than two years. Reliable sources indicate that it is unlikely that he will be president again at anytime in the near future. But that’s OK, because the nation is in the very best of hands.
ITEM: In the “You’re Kidding, Right? Nobody’s That Politically Correct! Department, we travel (here) to Pottawattamie County and Treynor High School where a terrorism scenario drill will take place. The scenario? Two teenage white supremacist/ “firearms enthusiasts” shoot up the school because they’re upset about illegal immigration, of course! Those Californians! What would you expect from such...what’s that? It’s not in California? It’s where?! IOWA?! Iowa. According to the DesMoines Register, Doug Reed, “lead exercise planner” for the County emergency management agency said “the exercise is not intended to be political and shouldn’t be interpreted as criticizing gun owners or opponents of illegal immigration.” Reed, whose obfuscatory rhetorical skills obviously belong in the White House, also noted “This is purely the backdrop and the setup, if you will, to help create a perception of reality for the responders.”
Ah yes, a perception of reality! So let’s see, how many school shootings have been perpetrated by anti-immigrant firearms enthusiasts? None, so obviously this scenario represents the most currently realistic threat of attack on a school in a town with a population of 919 people. Here’s my scenario: An attack by federal bureaucrats who sue the school for violations of the ADA, the Clean Air Act and an obscure treaty protecting a rare ant. That’s arguably more realistic. Discuss.
ITEM: And This Week’s Louis Renault Award goes to: Anyone who ever thought a progressive’s brain could contain a rational, economic thought. I’m shocked, shocked! As I’m sure the ridiculously smart and lovely Michelle Malkin (here) is, and from whom comes news of Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on Chris Matthews--our national leg tingler’s--Hardball show presenting his solution to the nation’s economic woes. To wit: “You don’t want government to hold back, you want government right now, yes, the deficit’s a long-term problem, but right not you don’t want to cut government spending, yet Eric Cantor and the Republicans are indulging, you hear it over and over.” You just can’t make this stuff up, folks.
ITEM: Regular readers know that I’ve been following the dubious fortunes of the Government Motors Chevy Volt. Now, from autobloggreen (here) comes news that Washington, Texas and Oregon are considering levying a special tax on electric vehicles! Why? They don’t generate gasoline taxes yet use the same roads as those who do. There is justice in the world after all. And irony, loads and loads of irony. This is just electric (ar, ar) with irony!
ITEM: I think the headline of this article says all you need to know about Joe Biden and the Democrats: “Biden Aide Apologizes After Reporter Kept In Storage Closet During Fundraiser.” According to Biden spokeswoman Elizabeth Alexander, the closet wasn’t really a closet, it was a “hold room.” Yeah. Sure. Hope. Change. Transparency. Tell me again why reporters have to wear drool buckets whenever they’re around Obama or his lackeys? Imagine the media outrage if this had been done by a Republican? And no, I’m not making this one up, honest.
ITEM: You Just Can’t Make This Stuff Up: In a Media Myth Alert (here) we find this actual correction from the paper of record, the New York Times:
“An article in The Times Magazine last Sunday about Ivana Trump and her spending habits misstated the number of bras she buys. It is two dozen black, two dozen white, not two thousand of each.” Uh, don’t they actually employ any editors at that paper? To normal folks with a normal number of breasts, 2000 is just a bit larger than 24, and a bit more obvious.
ITEM: This headline says it all too: “US: most energy resources in the world and most incoherent energy policy.” Well yeah...read the whole thing from Hot Air (here). Oh well. At least we’re helping Brazil with their oil industry...hey!
ITEM: I know you’ve asked yourself this question: Why are Russians so unsmiling? Find the answer at Pravda, (here). Well, if you’d lived under Communism for a century--just a guess, mind you...
ITEM: Mr. Obama failed to get a poll bounce after his Libya attack that wasn’t an attack with clear goals that weren’t and with a victory plan that wasn’t clearly led by America but not really led by anyone... From the New Republic, via The Daily Caller (here), we discover that the reason for this lack of bounce is (drum roll please, Maestro!) John Boehner didn’t praise it! That’s right, the Republican Speaker of the House’s praise is apparently responsible for the popularity of Democrat presidents. And I thought it was just because Mr. Obama was late and incoherent, but what do I know?
ITEM: Something To Think About Department: What happens to American unity when enough major companies and businesses move to states that actually recognize that businesses and productive citizens are preferable to boarded up storefronts and non-productive entitlement takers? Explore one of the indicators of this potential future divide in a post by Doug Powers at Michelle Malkin’s blog (here). Caterpillar is currently telling the government of the Democrat People’s Republic of Illinois that if they don’t get business friendly in a hurry, Caterpillar is going to move elsewhere. Will the Dem. machine pols that run Illinois listen? Will they listen in other Dem-controlled states? What happens to a state when everyone is taking and there is no one left around to produce?
ITEM: Doesn’t Work and Play Well with Others! Department: At Michelle Malkin (the blog, not the charming Michelle), Doug Powers (here) notes a dust up between Secretary of Defense Gates and Secretary of State Clinton. More evidence of the utter incoherence and disarray of Obama foreign policy, as if you needed any more. Interesting and telling nonetheless.
ITEM: Sharia Goes To School! At National Review Online (here), the highly competent Mona Charen has a nice article about a Muslim teacher who demanded three weeks off in the middle of a school year to perform the Hajj, which is a pilgrimage to Mecca all observant Muslims are expected to make--if possible--once in a lifetime. Why is this noteworthy? Because the school reasonably refused, the teacher resigned and did it anyway, but she also contacted the Justice Department, and guess what, Holder’s boys and girls are suing the school district! By the way, I covered this issue for Pajamas Media back in December. Go here for that article.
ITEM: When someone gets shot by a shotgun in the movies, they fly backwards 20 feet. That’s the way it really is, right? To find out about some great movie/gun myths, go here. And no, getting shot by a shotgun doesn’t fling people any distance. Basic physics: Any firearm that could, from the energy delivered by its projectile, fling someone 20 feet would have the same reaction on the shooter. People fall down and/or backwards when shot out of surprise, shock, and the “Oh s**t! I’ve been shot!” reaction.
ITEM: LOUIS RENAULT AWARD OF THE MONTH! We are shocked, shocked! to learn (here and here) that in a letter to Congress delivered on March 19, Eric Holder’s Department of Justice noted that it had diligently investigated Eric Holder’s DOJ and concluded that Eric Holder’s DOJ is absolutely blameless, blameless! in dismissing the infamous voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party, one of the leaders of which has been immortalized on video exhorting fellow blacks to kill white babies. C’mon, what’d you expect? Eric Holder knows were all cowards because we don’t obsess sufficiently about race, so his DOJ and he are filling the race gap all by themselves. Hope. Change. Race-baiting.
ITEM: President Obama has spent substantial time bragging about his “coalition” of which we’re not really a leader, no, that NATO, sort of, maybe is the leader, and how we’re protecting Libyan lives, except maybe they could be virulent terrorists, and it’s the right thing to do and all, and Qaddafi has to go, except we’re not going to do anything to make that happen, except he knows he has to go, and he didn’t talk to Congress, but if they, you now, want to talk about this, that’s OK with him, and Hillary Clinton is talking to just bunches of people, you know, just bunches. Hmm. Let’s see if I have this straight: Both Bushes had much, much bigger coalitions for their wars--which they actually called wars--and both got Congressional resolutions for their wars. If it’s so morally right, why do we need a coalition to act in the first place? Aren’t we the good guys anymore? And what the hell is Mr. Obama talking about anyway? And don’t get me started on Hillary Clinton. Discuss.
ITEM: Black Flight! No, I’m not talking about levitating black people, but about blacks moving, in record numbers, out of the blue states where decades of social experimentation have devastated the black family. Read this article by Walter Russell Mead. A significant shift in political reality may well be underway. Guess where most are moving? The South. Hope. Change. Cosmic irony.
ITEM: GREAT MOMENTS IN SMART DIPLOMACY! Department. Visit NewsBusters (here) to see the post-Obama Libya speech reaction by Libyans as reported by NBC. In a nutshell: They’re enormously relieved and emboldened. But wait a minute, shouldn’t a speech by the POTUS in wartime make our enemies quake with trepidation and fear instead of making them want to party? I’m sure, being one of those cloddish God and gun clingers, that I’m just too dense to appreciate the nuance inherent in Mr. Obama’s foreign policy. No doubt Sen. John Kerry (D, John Kerry) could explain it in an appropriately nuanced fashion.
ITEM: We’re All Disabled Now! From Fox News (here) comes the news that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, following the Obama Administration’s practice of getting through regulation what it can’t through legitimate means, has redefined “disability” under the Americans With Disability Act. If Congress doesn’t act, the new regulations, which could actually result in most Americans being able to claim disabled status, will take effect in May. More disabled Americans equals more demands on business, equals less profit, equals fewer jobs, equals less business, equals higher unemployment, equals less tax revenue, equals greater reliance on the all-powerful government, equals our continuing descent into third world status. Hope. Change. Obama domestic policy.
ITEM: Just A Thought: Pundit after pundit is writing that Mr. Obama’s Libya speech was “eloquent,” but contradictory, confusing, and/or made little or no sense. Hmm. If a speech is contradictory, confusing and made little or no sense, is it really eloquent, or was it, at best, a reasonably competent teleprompter reading? Can saying essentially “blah, blah, blah, and more blah” be eloquent?
ITEM: Cash For Clunkers II: This Time It’s Personal! Yes, gentle readers, Cash For Clunkers was so successful the first time around, it wasted $3 billion dollars, depressed the numbers of vehicles available on the used car market and increased the cost of those remaining so much that it only makes sense the Obamites would try it again--sort of. And as you suspected, it’s tied into the ridiculously unpopular Chevy Volt. According to The Blaze (here) the Obamites are planning to change the current $7500 tax credit for green cars--the only two currently available are the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf--to a rebate immediately available at the point of sale. Who is excited about this--apart from the Obama Administration? General Motors, another subsidiary of the Democrat party. So let’s see, Volts are currently selling for as much as $65,000, so with the rebate, that’s only $57,500! Buy one for each day of the week! Meanwhile, Nissan’s Leaf sales are, to put it mildly, uninspiring, perhaps even more uninspiring than Volt sales.
ITEM: Here’s a delightful bit of history about the Slinky! Yes, as you always suspected, it was originally intended to be a tension spring in the engine horsepower meters of battleships! Go here.
ITEM: Yes, Once Again, I’ve Read Your Minds! I Know Exactly What You Want to See! Go here for a video on a slingshot/crossbow hybrid that shoots--wait for it--machetes! The video reveals that no piece of cardboard within two feet is safe. Nor is the maker’s arm.
And with that bit of whimsy, I’ll bid you adieu for this week. Thanks for stopping by, and I’ll see you again next Thursday!.
Posted by: MikeM at
12:16 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
A slingshot for machetes! Hmmm, where is Darwin when you need him?
Posted by: REB In Raleigh at April 04, 2011 06:14 AM (mz9Zk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 29, 2011
Erik Scott Case at Pajamas Media
The good folks at Pajamas Media have been kind enough to post my recent article on the Scott case, available here. Regular readers who have been following the case on Confederate Yankee will find it to be a summary of recent developments for those who have not been regular readers. Even so, the comments are entertaining, and PJM is a fine site that is worth your while.
I'll be posting another update--10.3--on the case at CY within a day or two as some additional information has been made available on some of the newer developments.
Posted by: MikeM at
07:25 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Police are a statutory construction of the law. There is no Common Law or Constitutional basis for police officers. The first paid police force, in the English speaking world, was in England around the 1830's.
Police have gone from a paid police force relieving people of the individual responsibility of law enforcement to a tool for statists. Court, including the US Supreme Court, have ruled that police are not required to protect you. Contrast these ruling to in MA for example requiring occupants to leave their home should an intruder enter it. Yep, the intruder has to be left alone in your house until the police – the ones who do not have a duty to protect you – get there.
Posted by: Mark at March 30, 2011 02:00 PM (PYaqh)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 28, 2011
Courting Armageddon
I've been warning of the apocalyptic Hojjatieh sect that rules Iran for the better part of four years now. They believe that the end of the world is imminent, which isn't too dissimilar to factions and cults within religions dating from the beginning of time until now. What separates the Hojjatieh from all other cults is that they believe they have a duty to help bring about the end of the world, and they very nearly have the capacity to do so.
The Hojjatieh are a sect within Shia "Twelver" Islam in Iran that rules the terrorist state, which either has nuclear weapons capability, or are on the edge of developing that capability.
The cult has not been shy about its beliefs, nor has it sought to hide its presence. Its most fierce advocate is none other than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, acting on the orders of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Now the world's only nuclear cult has released a film alerting Muslims to the imminent return of the Madhi and the end of life on Earth.
One of the most important keys to securing the reappearance of the last messiah — as called for in the Hadith — is the annihilation of Israel, and the conquering of Beitol Moghadas (Jerusalem). They state with conviction that Islam will soon conquer the world, and that all infidels will be destroyed.
The pursuit of nuclear bombs by the radicals ruling Iran is directly connected to this belief: war, chaos, and lawlessness must engulf the world to pave the way for Imam Mahdi's reappearance.
This movie has been produced in Iran by an organization called Conductors of The Coming, in collaboration with the Iranian president's office and the Basij (Iranian paramilitary force). Also, reports indicate that Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, President Ahmadinejad's top adviser and chief of staff, was directly involved with this project. The movie was completed a few months ago and was recently screened for the high clerics by the Iranian president’s office, with one of its high-ranking official analyzing it.
For the past few years, Ahmadinejad has been telling everyone who would listen that Iran intends to wipe Israel off the map. If Iran launches such an attack, the resulting retaliatory strike—the so-called Samson Option—would destroy the Muslim Middle East that has attempted time and again to destroy the Jewish state. Tens of millions will die in the carnage. The region will be uninhabitable, and the fallout will circle the globe and affect us all.
The Iranian leaders are preparing their followers for this end of days that they plan to initiate. Our leftist Western leaders stand silent, unwilling to believe that madmen with the means to destroy the world intend to do just that if they feel the time is right.
Watch the film for yourself.
With the creation of The Coming, the Iranian leadership indicates that they are in the final preparatory stages prior to launching an attack on Israel in hopes of triggering the cleansing fire their Madhi's return demands.
Our leaders will beg forgiveness if the world burns, but they will do nothing to prevent it.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:10 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
With luck, our latest demorepub president will be addressing congress about the latest threats in the middle east when the truck-nuc goes off on Pennsylvania Avenue...
Posted by: emdfl at March 28, 2011 11:19 AM (65/pK)
2
emdfl,
That is assuming he can get off the golf course or can stay in town instead of going on vacations.
You have to remember that this is only extremist Muslims that are causing all the problems. Muslims in general are peaceful and would not wish harm on others. (RIGHT)
Posted by: david7134 at March 28, 2011 05:23 PM (V0cN9)
3
I wonder if they believe in the anti-Christ? They might want to talk to Barry before they start setting off nukes.
Posted by: hiscross at March 29, 2011 12:05 PM (Kadue)
4
im waiting for armageddon on 2012. im not that superficial but this year really scares me!
Posted by: dario at March 29, 2011 01:55 PM (uulTf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Down to the Final Four
Kentucky, UConn, and... Virginia Commonwealth and Butler?
Oh, well. I'm sure that screwed up a ton of office brackets, but if you bet on sports you know that momentum is a fickle thing, and it enable the most unlikely of underdogs to shine as giants (what, Duke?) unexpectedly collapse.
I'm one of a small number of native North Carolinians immune to "March Madness," but that is certainly a product of going to a school (East Carolina) that has always been more focused on the gridiron and the diamond than the court. Now that Carolina has fallen, most of my fellow Tarheels will settle back down to work.
It will be all over a week from today in Houston and the rest of the nation will turn their attention eslewhere.
They maybe someone will inform President ESPN that we're at war in Libya. I'm sure he'll be surprised.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:02 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The 1st words out of President ESPNs mouth will be spmething to the effect of "what's a Libya?"
Posted by: REB In Raleigh at March 28, 2011 07:02 PM (mz9Zk)
2
Butler U. shouldn't be too much of a surprise. They were in last years final.
Posted by: MikeM_inMd at March 29, 2011 09:56 PM (6hI0A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
<< Page 23 >>
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.1637 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.1484 seconds, 115 records returned.
Page size 161 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.