Scared Criminals = Bad?

Did you know that, according to the LA Times, that criminals scared of breaking the law is bad? Apparently, again, according to the LA Times, criminals should not be scared to break the law. I guess the Times would prefer that criminals and law enforcement just be peaceful. Perhaps in their world, crimes would go like this:

Criminal: Hi, I'm here to rape, rob, and murder you.
Victim: Oh great. I just need to finish up mailing this letter, then I'll be right with you.
Criminal: That's fine, I can wait a couple minutes.
Victim: Okay, I'm done, you can go right ahead with your crime.
Criminal: Thanks for cooperating.

* Criminal the proceeds to rape, rob, and murder the victim. As the criminal finishes, the police show up *

Policeman: Hey, you there, are you committing a crime?
Criminal: (zipping up pants) Who, me? No, not at all. I just found this person here.
Policeman: Really? Are you sure? It sort of looks like you just killed that person. After all, you've got blood all over you, and that's her purse in your hand.
Criminal: Okay, you got me. I'm sorry. I'm the one who did this. I killed her.
Policeman: That's better. I'm glad that you admitted it. Now how do you feel about your crime?
Criminal: I feel really bad, sortof. I just don't know.
Policeman: Well let's sit down and talk about it, m'kay?

Hey LA Times, perhaps you're not aware of it, but there's bad people in the world. There's people who break the law. And there's people, who if they're not stopped, will continue to break the law and do violent and bad things to other people. I'm sorry that the LA Times cannot understand something so simple.

Posted by: Ogre at 03:07 PM

Comments

1 No no no...we want criminals to be afraid. Yes indeed. Course what we want means nothing to the leftards who see peace and good will in every person. I wish the world were that simple. I wish that a platter of cookies and milk would stop a criminal from their crime. But it doesn't work that way.

Posted by: Raven at October 30, 2007 09:25 PM (ohnld)

2 Apparently you're confused. Just ask the LA Times. Milk, cookies, and midnight basketball, and there will be no crime. And if that fails, it's because the wrong person was in charge and they didn't spend enough money.

Posted by: Ogre at October 30, 2007 09:45 PM (2WD8n)

3 I guess when the editors have to go to the morgue to identify what used to be their sons or daughters, victimized by lawbreakers... the milk and cookies theory will go right out the window! These "California fruits and nuts" get on my last nerve with their moonbat agendas.

Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at November 06, 2007 02:20 AM (TzKlC)

4 Unfortunately, it won't. They'll just blame Bush instead of the criminals.

Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2007 02:21 AM (2WD8n)

5 Yeah, can you say "accountability doesn't exist in the media"??? They just make me sick.

Posted by: HoosierArmyMom at November 06, 2007 03:12 AM (TzKlC)

6 Well, they just redefine "accountability" to mean "everything is Bush's fault."

Posted by: Ogre at November 06, 2007 02:17 PM (oifEm)






Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0097 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0078 seconds, 14 records returned.
Page size 6 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.