Blame for Fires

Well, I'm glad we've finally figured out the solution to all the fires in California. You see, while Barbara Boxer blames Bush, it appears that she was wrong all along. Instead, according to liberal, unelected bureaucrats (who are never, ever, ever, wrong), it was just lack of money. All we have to do is give up MORE money that we earn, and there will be no fires in California. Isn't that great news?

Therefore, all you liberals must immediately agree to send 80% of your earnings to California. It's for the "public good" and will "benefit everyone." And if you do, according to the bureaucrats, there will be no fires (or at least none that cause any damage). Isn't utopia wonderful?

Oh, and if, after you send them 80% of what you earn there are still fires, it only shows that you didn't give them enough money or the wrong people were in charge. A "new plan" will fix that (with a few more dollars, of course).

Liberals (Democrats/Socialists/etc) -- is there anything they can't do (with your money)?

Posted by: Ogre at 03:07 PM

Comments

1 Don't forget that it's for the children too.

Posted by: Trench at October 25, 2007 04:18 PM (VEZiY)

2 I'm sure it is -- but they didn't actually tote that line out this time -- YET...

Posted by: Ogre at October 25, 2007 04:27 PM (oifEm)

3 Hey, it's not like the fires come around all the time in Southern California:
http://www.echozoe.com/?p=16
Check the date on that post.

Posted by: Echo Zoe at October 25, 2007 11:28 PM (nIDjA)

4 Nope, fires never happen there. Guess it was a slow news week. I'm thinking they start positioning the satellites when fire season comes around just for the pictures.

Posted by: Ogre at October 26, 2007 12:07 AM (2WD8n)

Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.007 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0055 seconds, 12 records returned.
Page size 4 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.