People Want More Government

I think those of us who want freedom will continue to have trouble -- because so many people (most educated by the system) really want government to do stuff for them. Maybe they're just lazy, but again and again I read about people demanding "more" from government -- no matter the cost to freedom. And that just stinks. Take a look at this news release:

The Civitas Institute has been involved in conducting surveys in North Carolina for more than two years. Every month the voters are asked to pick the issue or program that needs the most attention from state government. During the past two years lower health care costs has always been in the top three and usually the top choice.

According to the October DecisionMaker Poll, 21 percent of voters said that lower health care cost is the most important issue facing the state. Within the margin of error is to improve public education at 20 percent, followed by 17 percent who want to control immigration. These three issues have consistently been the top three issues; controlling immigration has grown over the two-year period.

In a series of questions on health care, the study found that North Carolina voters are satisfied with the quality of health care they receive by a 76 percent to 23 percent margin. The cost of health insurance is voter’s major concern (43 percent) with 31 percent concerned about the number of poor without health insurance. These two major concerns are followed by 16 percent who are concerned about the availability or access to quality care and 5 percent about the inability to qualify for health insurance.

The working poor in need of government provided health care is strongly tied to the poverty level. Forty-two percent of those surveyed believe the income level for the working poor to receive government insurance should be $21,000 per year. Another 29 percent would cap the income level for the working poor at $41,000, and only 6 percent believe the coverage should extend to families making $62,000. A small-minority of voters (4 percent) believe coverage for the working poor should include families of four making in excess of $62,000 per year.

“When voters say they are concerned about lower health care costs they are really concerned about the cost of health insurance,” according to Civitas President Jack Hawke. “And when it comes to government providing health insurance for the working poor more than 70 percent would cap the income level at $41,000. It is obvious that voters do not favor providing health coverage for families with incomes more than $41,000 per year, as many of our legislators support.”

Tel Opinion Research of Alexandria, Va. conducted the poll on October 9-14 with 800 registered voters who voted in the 2002 and 2004 general elections, were first time voters in the 2006 general election, or voted in 2004 and 2006 as newly registered voters. It has a margin of error of +-3.7 percent.


In other words, a majority of people support government using force to take money from some people who earn it and freely give it to people who do NOT earn it. That's not freedom. AND they want government to interfere MORE with business to "reduce" health care costs. Folks, government CAUSED the high insurance prices, especially in North Carolina!

One of the primary reasons health insurance is so expensive in NC is that the state forces insurers to cover things you may not want. For example, I want just catastrophic coverage (only pay when I'm seriously injured, don't cover doctor visits, etc). I also do NOT want to pay for chiropractic coverage, AIDS coverage, mental health "treatments" and outpatient counseling. However, the state will NOT PERMIT me to buy that coverage. I am forced to buy all that coverage I DO NOT WANT. That's the #1 reason insurance is expensive.

The #2 reason is the lack of tort reform, but that's a topic for another post...

GOVERNMENT is completely incapable of solving just about ANY problem. They simply cannot do it.

Posted by: Ogre at 11:04 AM

Comments

1 and it's like people are completely amnesiatic. Ask anyone to name a program which the government has implemented successfully - measured against COST of course. THERE ARE NONE.

sheep. stupid sheep.

(*)>

Posted by: birdwoman at October 19, 2007 01:48 PM (vR7Sl)

2 Oh, I'm sorry, you can't measure government programs by cost. You see, in government, the measure of success is how much money you SPEND. The more you spend, the better your program. NOTHING else matters (results, return on investment, people helped, expenses -- none of it).

Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2007 01:55 PM (oifEm)

3 sarcasm becomes you


(*)>

Posted by: birdwoman at October 19, 2007 02:00 PM (vR7Sl)

4 And it's really scary when it's not really sarcasm.

Posted by: Ogre at October 19, 2007 02:05 PM (oifEm)






Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0067 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0053 seconds, 12 records returned.
Page size 8 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.