The City of Philadelphia has come out with open opposition to NOT having man-boy anal sex in public buildings. They have voted to kick out an organization that doesn't openly support man-boy anal sex from all public buildings. I guess the "City of Brotherly Love" takes it's motto seriously. They claim it's "discrimination" to openly say that man-boy anal sex is wrong.
I was once asked by someone if I discriminated. I said that I discriminated all the time -- against actions. For example, I discriminate against rapists. I discriminate against those who murder innocent people. And yes, I discriminate against any male who wants to have anal sex with a boy. But according to the City of Philadelphia, that makes me "abhorrent" and "at opposition with the city's principles." I'm glad to be on the right side of this one; but I'm amazed that the City of Philadelphia can openly support man-boy anal sex in public buildings.
1
its not about discrimination... i would like to see the numbers, but im already sure of the outcome, how much higher of a chance is there for a gay male to molest a young boy than the chance for a straight male to do the same thing? im guessing much more likely to happen... and that alone should be enough for the policy, morals nonwithstanding.
Posted by: chris at June 01, 2007 06:11 PM (qz/By)
2
The City of Philadelphia officially declares you, Chris, "abhorrent."
5
heh, let em try... thats one case i could prove in court...
i sent you an email at your gmail about a story here in NC i just know you are gonna love
Posted by: chris at June 01, 2007 06:37 PM (qz/By)
6
You really believe you could have your day in court, don't you? Poor, deluded soul. You will say in court exactly what the judge tells you to say and NOTHING more. You will NOT introduce things like "laws" in the courtroom unless the judge specifically allows you to. And sadly, this isn't in jest, that's the truth today. A courtroom is NOT a friendly place where justice prevails any more.
7
personally, the judge is not the one i have a problem with... the jury is... juries are soo fallible that i would rather take my chances with a PSE/polygraph in fact, were i ever charged with a major crime that i didn't commit, i would insist on it... not only that i would force the judicial system to investigate the reliability of mechanical systems such as that... juries have proven to be way less reliable than the claimed 99% reliability of a polygraph...
Posted by: chris at June 01, 2007 07:34 PM (qz/By)
8
LAWLS!!!!! just noticed that the amazon add showing at the bottom of this post was this pic
11
"...the Scouts' use of a building was "contrary" to the city's opposition to discrimination."
I can only shake my head in disbelief.
Would the city condemn a group that supports pedophilia? Probably so. Un-F-ing-real.
Posted by: david drake at June 01, 2007 10:02 PM (S83Pv)
12
It's amazing how far this country has gone. This is why I don't think there's hope for America any more. There's people who honestly believe the Boy Scouts are bad. That's just totally foolish.
13
The city of brotherly love (pun) has adopted the values of the Islamic terrorists. Their murder rate has caught up with Bagdad so you really do reap what you sow.
Posted by: Scrapiron at June 02, 2007 01:45 PM (A5s0y)
14
I'm sure they love Islamic terrorists, too, but I wonder what the city will do when someone realizes that Islam and gayness are not compatible.