Best Buy Lawsuit Lottery

Welcome again to Lawsuit Lottery. This week it's another lottery entrant who wants to make millions off someone who didn't do anything to them. Enter our first contestants, Sarah Vasquez and her mother Natalie Fornaciari.

Sarah and Natalie want Best Buy to give them some money. Why? Because Best Buy is a big, evil corporation and they have more money than Sarah and Natalie. So they want to punish Best Buy for working and earning money and they want to force Best Buy to share cash with them.

So, what did Best Buy DO to Sarah and Natalie? Absolutely nothing. That's correct, not a single, solitary thing.

However, Sarah and Natalie claim that a person, one Hao Kuo Chi, did enter their home (with permission from Sarah and Natalie) and proceed to record Sarah in the shower. Oh, and they didn't give permission for him to do that. For those who are a little slow on the uptake, Best Buy did not order Hao Kuo Chi to record Sarah in the shower.

So, do Sarah and Natalie go after the person who actually did something wrong, Hao Kou Chi? Well gee, Hao's only 26 and doesn't likely have a lot of money, so they don't want to sue him. Heck, I bet there's not a slimy, bottom-feeder lawyer who would sue Hao because they wouldn't make enough money from him. So instead Sarah and Natalie (and their slimeball servant, Gloria Allred) have decided to sue Best Buy for "compensatory and punitive damages for alleged fraud, negligent misrepresentation and hiring, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress."

What a pile of you-know-what. If there were justice in this country, Gloria Allred would be fined tens of thousands of dollars and Sarah and Natalie would also be personally fined for wasting the court's time and my tax money.

I'm not saying Sarah and Natalie weren't victims and that there was nothing wrong here -- I'm just saying that Sarah and Natalie are nothing but greedy, money-driven bastards for attacking a company who did absolutely nothing wrong except attempt to help Sarah and Natalie. I hope companies in Pomono, CA learn from this and refuse to do business with these two again. I know I would.

Posted by: Ogre at 02:05 PM

Comments

1 Don't know about you, but, when I let someone I don't know in to the house to do something like fix a sink or whatever, I don't tend to go off and take a shower while they are wandering around. Sarah is apparently an idiot.

Posted by: William Teach at April 16, 2007 01:21 AM (doAuV)

2 Good point -- In fact, when I have someone I don't know in the house, I pretty much don't let them walk around at all without me standing right next to them!

Posted by: Ogre at April 16, 2007 01:23 AM (kRDOE)

3 There is no proof that the chip was his or is there a way to find out the owner of the chip?

How do they know that they didn't tape themself, and take the chip in and say it was the best buy employee's chip?

Posted by: Quality Weenie at April 16, 2007 04:20 PM (BksWB)

4 Good point. But I'm betting the chip will have information like the guy's phone number and service provider, which would be hard to fake easily.

Posted by: Ogre at April 16, 2007 05:19 PM (oifEm)

5 you don't know the whole story. i know these people and know exactly what happend and what their home looks like. every easy for him to be making repairs in the bedroom and use the bathroom to do his evil deed!

Posted by: Travis at April 23, 2007 10:37 PM (4mQum)

6 I know that Best Buy shouldn't have to pay one red cent because the company didn't do a damn thing wrong! Sure, sue the guy who did it, but to sue the company is nothing more than being greedy and trying to get something for nothing.

Posted by: Ogre at April 24, 2007 12:41 AM (kRDOE)






Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0096 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0078 seconds, 14 records returned.
Page size 7 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.