What Did They Do Wrong?
Always on Watch has been asking this week about lying. At the same time, Kat has been speaking with people about "absolute truth." And today has news that some people are accused of fraud. But did they do anything wrong?
A Vancouver woman admitted Monday that she coached her two children — beginning when they were 4 and 8 years old — to fake retardation so she could collect Social Security benefits on their behalf.
So how is that wrong? Isn't this country based upon the government helping those who need help? Isn't government designed, today, to take care of people? Doesn't government measure it's own success by how many people it manages to help? So why is what this woman did wrong? She needed help and she got it from government. Perhaps it's wrong because government says it's wrong. According to the all-powerful law, she is guilty of "conspiracy to defraud the government." So apparently, the only reason what she did was wrong is because the government says that you're not allowed to fake being disabled. Wonderful society we've built here, isn't it? And I wonder why so many people looked at me like I was crazy when a few weeks ago I asked the waitress if she mis-charged me because my drinks weren't on the check she gave me.
Whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much.
When you act dishonestly, you ARE stealing from another person. You might deceive yourself into thinking it is a business, the government, or an insurance company that is suffering the loss, but really it is the business owners, fellow taxpayers, or policy holders from whom you are stealing. It is just as if you had taken the money from their wallets. Dishonestly always injures people. The victim is always a person.
You shall not steal. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
Then again, if there is no absolute truth, if there is no higher power than ones' self, then anything is not only permissible, but actually right.
Comments
Posted by: Steph at February 27, 2007 04:32 PM (AC9Dc)
If they get to the point where they brag to me, as they have done to others, I'll ask them if they're going to say thank you, since I'm paying their benefits. Somehow, I don't think even that will shame them.
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at February 27, 2007 06:53 PM (vR7Sl)
Posted by: Ogre at February 27, 2007 07:34 PM (oifEm)
Posted by: Steph at February 27, 2007 09:14 PM (AC9Dc)
Posted by: Ogre at February 27, 2007 09:44 PM (kft0e)
I don't know that the current politics are going to lead to such a radical movement but it's sure looking like it... hate the thought... but I would rather die than live in the socialized world the politicians are trying to achieve.
Posted by: Steph at February 28, 2007 01:51 AM (AC9Dc)
Posted by: Ogre at February 28, 2007 02:26 AM (kft0e)
Right and wrong is a social construct.
It is based a cost-benefit analysis. Or maybe a social contract, but I'm still looking for the contract I signed, so that could be wrong, too.
From the woman's perspective, this was the right thing to do. There were all kinds of benefits to her actions which outweighed the distant costs. Whether her reckoning is correct is yet to be determined, I think. It kinda depends on the sentence.
From the government's perspective, well, it really depends on how you look at it. Pursuing her would perhaps be the wrong approach, because how much will it cost the state in legal fees and housing her in prison and supporting her children in the foster care system if that is where they end up?
Or maybe Kohlberg is more relevant. The woman's moral development clearly stopped at that stage where something is believed to be wrong only if caught. But that is where most of society is, so since she is normal, can we really pursue her?
"Thou shalt not steal" is a bit simpler, isn't it?
Posted by: Dana at February 28, 2007 07:37 AM (8bYMT)
As you mention -- that's where society is today. There is no absolute right or wrong, according to the all-powerful government -- only what they say.
Posted by: Ogre at February 28, 2007 11:26 AM (oifEm)
Posted by: intensive driving course at December 17, 2011 01:07 PM (+s9Rt)
Posted by: Marks and Spencer Travel Insurance at December 17, 2011 01:40 PM (02Q5V)
Posted by: NVQ 3 Teaching Assistant at December 17, 2011 04:26 PM (02Q5V)
Posted by: benefits after redundancy at December 17, 2011 08:56 PM (02Q5V)
Posted by: Dog Grooming Table at December 17, 2011 09:45 PM (EkTBm)
Posted by: teaching assistant agencies at December 18, 2011 12:36 AM (z/DHp)
Posted by: NVQ Level 2 Health and Social Care at December 18, 2011 01:50 AM (qPLur)
Posted by: Cheap Contents Insurance at December 18, 2011 02:40 AM (qPLur)
Posted by: Driving School insurance at January 01, 2012 04:32 AM (02Q5V)
Posted by: Tami Donaldson at January 05, 2012 12:42 PM (TL+A3)
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0214 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0177 seconds, 27 records returned.
Page size 16 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.