Time for 2016?
Well, since Hillary has already won the presidential election for 2008, and she will assuredly win again in 2012, perhaps we should just accept her manifest destiny as our supreme ruler and focus on who she would want us to elect to replace her in 2012.
Will it be Chelsea? That would certainly be the logical progression of annointed rulers, wouldn't it? If Hillary tells us that's what we should do, then we should do it, since she is the smartest woman in the world. So perhaps 2016 and 2020 will be Chelsea. Maybe we should just wait until 2024 before we consider electing some that's, well, not a Clinton. I guess we'll have to wait for Hillary to tell us because we're so stupid. And we have to pay attention to what the media says, because after all, not only is Hillary the smartest woman in the world, she's also the first female presidential candidate (and might be black like her husband, too). Oh wait, that's not right, actually Victoria Claflin Woodhull, way back in 1870 was first. Well, surely, based on the media drooling, Hillary is the first since then, right? Well, not quite. There was Belva Ann Lockwood in 1884 AND 1888. Well, perhaps she's the first in recent history. Except for Margaret Chase Smith who ran for the Republican nomination in 1964. So maybe she's the first Democrat woman to run. Oops. Don't forget Shirley Chisholm, Patsy Mink, and Bella Abzug who ALL ran on the Democrat ticket in 1972. And let's not forget Elizabeth Dole in 2000 and Carol Moseley Braun in 2004. Look, a woman running for president is nothing new. But the news media is absolutely frothing at the mouth to be the first to be her lap dogs. Don't look for one serious question to be asked by anyone anywhere in the formerly mainstream media, because they absolutely love and adore this woman. The major networks and newspapers across the country are already heavily campaigning to get this woman elected. She's winning a poll already, and look for her to be ahead in every single poll conducted between now and 2020. So, what's Clinton's biggest campaign issue? What's the most important thing to her that she wants to do as president? What's the most significant problem facing the country today that only she can fix? Freedom. Specifically, there's too much of it, and she's going to stop that. How? Well, in her announcement, she claims that "It's simply wrong" that people have the freedom to earn money. She says that "it's simply wrong" that people have the freedom to select their own doctors. She claims "it's simply wrong" that people have the freedom to pay others to fix their medical ailments -- and she's going to stop them. Never mind Iran building nuclear weapons. Don't worry about those silly Chinese communists and their missiles. Forget that whole escalation in the middle east. The southern border? No, that's no big deal. And never mind those pesky terrorists. The most important issue facing America today, according to Clinton, is that a few people don't have health insurance. My only hope is that over the next year the freedom-despising and America-hating Democrats that run the Congress will screw things up so badly that enough people will actually wake up and realize how deadly and destructive a Clinton presidency would be that they won't elect her in droves. And yes, I'm aware that it is only a tiny bit of hope.
Comments
1
Three decades of Bush-Clinton rule, YIPPEE!!!! And they say we don't have royal families in the U.S.!
Posted by: Echo Zoe at January 23, 2007 07:11 PM (8POA1)
2
Hey, are you questioning the Royal decision-makers? I think someone needs some re-education...
Posted by: Ogre at January 23, 2007 07:12 PM (oifEm)
3
... or in Hillary's words "dialog"
Posted by: Echo Zoe at January 23, 2007 07:15 PM (8POA1)
4
You're still talking? Those government troops are getting slow... 
Posted by: Ogre at January 23, 2007 07:27 PM (oifEm)
5
Gag me. First it was Pelosi. Now Clinton.
Estrogen (or the severe lack of it actually) is going to KILL AMERICA.
Estrogen (or the severe lack of it actually) is going to KILL AMERICA.
Posted by: Raven at January 24, 2007 02:00 AM (2VAMH)
6
Be quiet you. They will tell you what to think.
Posted by: Ogre at January 24, 2007 02:12 AM (pHUVv)
7
Ogre, I don't much care about the dynasty issue. The fact is the best Governor in the country is Jeb BUSH. To disqualify ANYONE because of who their family is stinks and prevents us from choosing the best person for the job.
Think about it this way Jeb or MItt?
Jeb or Guiliani? Starts to get easier doesn't it?
Think about it this way Jeb or MItt?
Jeb or Guiliani? Starts to get easier doesn't it?
Posted by: David at January 24, 2007 06:13 AM (FzAwx)
8
Given those choices, David, I select "None of the Above." I choose Tom Tancredo.
Posted by: Ogre at January 24, 2007 12:24 PM (oifEm)
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.0065 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0044 seconds, 16 records returned.
Page size 8 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.