Blatantly Biased "News?"
In an alleged news article by the Associated Press there's nothing but blatant, left-wing propaganda. In fact, there's almost no facts in the entire article!
There's little argument that North Carolina needs to act swiftly to protect its natural resources.
That's how the article starts. "Little argument?" I can find thousands of people who absolutely and completely disagree with that "little statement." I can find tens of thousands who would disagree that it's any of government's business to "protect" any natural resources at all.
Shellfishing grounds are shrinking due to pollution.
Not true. There's absolutely no way to prove that at all. Are they shrinking? Maybe. But maybe they're just moving. And if they are shrinking, is it due to pollution? Maybe it's due to algore's Global Warming (TM). Or maybe it's "evolution." To claim it's because of pollution shows a blatant agenda and total disregard for factual information. Remember -- this is in a "Global News" article.
Development is taking over acres of timberland and farm fields every day.
Well gee, we can't have that, can we? That would mean people could actually, well, have a place to live. It's stated as a bad thing -- apparently the Associated Press would prefer that everyone live in grass huts where they direct and nowhere else. Let's go check how many people in North Carolina are starving because of "loss of farm fields?" Oh, none? Damn that progress, anyway.
The question is where conservation will fall in the state's hierarchy of need when lawmakers consider doling out dollars in the coming session.
Welcome to the leftist view of government. Their only purpose is to "dole out dollars." Magical dollars that the government creates -- not that they steal from productive workers. And notice that conservation is automatically accepted as a "need" of the state. And yes, that's the all-powerful and all-knowing State that you slimy peon people are too stupid to understand or comprehend. Remember: Global News Article.
Wary of taking on new debt, the Legislature declined last year to act on a proposed billion-dollar bond package to buy and preserve land and historic sites across the state.
Gee, you think? The open complaint here is that the government had the gall to NOT go into debt when they clearly should have. Why, if the government had gone a few more billion into debt, there's be open fields as far as the eye could see and shellfish would prosper on the shores. Of course, people would be living in disease, filth, and misery, but that's okay with the Associated Press. What a horrible, slimy, socialist organization. And they still manage to claim to be a "news organization" -- and they can say that with a straight face. What scum.
Comments
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0037 seconds.
16 queries taking 0.0028 seconds, 7 records returned.
Page size 5 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.