Muslim Takeover

First, let me get this out of the way: A very large number of members of the muslim religion DO want to take over the world. They want their law in place and enforced by government agencies. If you don't believe that, feel free to stick your head back in the sand.

Now, Always on Watch has outlined one way they're doing that in England. They are instituing Sharia law. They ARE forcing their religion on everyone else. But they're not stopping there. FrontPage Magazine and The Washington Post highlight an area of Maryland where Muslims are gathering. These are relatively peaceful muslims, in that they're not openly beheading their opponents (yet). Instead, they're trying to work within the American system to take it over. And yes, they're working with Democrats.

The problem is that their system of law is simply not permitted in this country under the Constitution that formed this country-- or is it? Now, they, with the aid of terrorists in CAIR, are trying to claim anything that prevents them from instituting their law in America is a supression of their religion, which they claim under the First Amendment. So we have a rather unique situation.

The First Amendment to the US Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Therefore, based on that text, muslims claim they are free to exercise their religion. And their religion requires them to "behead those that insult Islam." In addition, there are dozens and dozens of laws that need to be enforced by government, in order for them to exercise their religion.

However, this conflicts with Article IV, Section 4:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Well, they simply overcome that idea by having "elections." You know Saddam was "elected," don't you? That's where Democrats and Republicans are moving with Gerrymandering, and the muslims are moving right along with them. Both the muslims and the Democrats agree that if the majority vote for no freedom, then you get no freedom. After all, there is no higher power in their minds than government.

So, what's to stop Maryland and Dearbornistan from insituting Sharia law if they simply vote it in?

Well, there used to be Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution that defines the powers of Congress, but we tossed that out decades ago. Under current interpretations, the U.S. Congress' power is literally unlimited.

The 19th Amendment to the Constitution (Women's Suffrage) will certainly give them some trouble. They won't like that one at all. It will slow them down, but then again, the majority of women vote Democrat anyway. Perhaps they'll just have a majority vote and decide that voting shall be limited to muslims. They'll say that's not "establishing" a religion and the newly renamed AMCLU will support them.

How about the 10th Amendment?

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Oh right. That 1864 conflict made sure that one doesn't really count any more.

Maybe the 8th Amendment might help ensure that Sharia law doesn't gain a foothold in the US

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

No, it's up to the courts (and judges appointed by Democrats and muslims) -- they can decide beheading with a dull knife is not "excessive."

How about the 5th Amendment?

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

If the Grand Jury is made up of muslims, they'll ensure Sharia laws of death are upheld. And we've already completely thrown out the last phrase in that Amendment anyway. Since we're already ignoring some parts of the Constitution, it should be pretty easy to ignore more, right?

How about the second?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Wait, that one was erased by court decisions decades ago, wasn't it? Don't believe me? Walk armed into New York City and see how far you get.

Maybe the first amendment could help?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

No, again, they'll just claim that they're NOT using religion as a basis for their laws. Or heck, they might even admit they're basing new laws on Sharia law, but they can just claim it's not an "establishment."

Do you see what's going on here? Based on current events, muslims are trying to take over the world a little at a time. Some are using violence, but some are trying with peaceful means. If they can join together in one area and have "elections," there will be nothing to stop them from forcing their will on everyone else in the area.

But you know what? There's nothing in the Constitution that actually can stop them. Go back and read that sentence again. Do you fully understand that? They can, and are, working to use the current government system in America to force you to submit to their religion.

So where did we get the idea that America should be the land of the free? For that, one has to go back to the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

If you've never read the Declaration, or haven't recently, please do read that excerpt above again.

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. None of those concepts exist with muslims in charge. And those are supposed to be unalienable rights. No one should be able to take those away. But the muslims will.

all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

That's so accurate. The VAST majority of people will choose to just adapt. Why not join in Dhimmitude? It's easy to do. It's a whole lot easier than fighting. After all, if you don't join them, you might be beheaded in front of your family. Just pay a little more in taxes, you won't miss it. It's only a few dollars a week - this time.

We are currently losing this battle for America. It's going to take a huge, bold act like the one that created that Declaration to obtain freedom once again. And as happened so many years ago, it's likely only going to be obtained by violence.

Posted by: Ogre at 03:52 PM

Comments

1 Outstanding, and spot on!

I MUST post a link to this, forthwith!

Posted by: Seth at November 30, 2006 04:12 PM (gR911)

2 Thank you. It might be "outstanding," but it's damn depressing, sadly.

Posted by: Ogre at November 30, 2006 04:15 PM (oifEm)

3 Damn. Just damn. We are doomed if we let this happen...Islam is teaching it's soldiers to take over this world- and really all they have to do is take down America and the world will be easy.

DAMN.

Posted by: Raven at November 30, 2006 05:02 PM (kW+8Z)

4 We ARE letting this happen. Right now. Today.

Posted by: Ogre at November 30, 2006 06:00 PM (oifEm)

5 I hear you, ogre. The libs and their PC nonsense are going to bring us down if we don't stop it.

Posted by: cube at November 30, 2006 06:10 PM (0V08x)

6 What gets to me about muslims across the world is they just don't get it. They wonder why everyone thinks they are violent and out to conquer the world. They say "violence is against Islam" and stuff like that. But when someone draws a cartoon of Muhammad, there are violent riots in the streets. When was the last time a caricature of the pope caused violent protests? They complain the West is intolerant, but they should take a good look at themselves.

Posted by: High Fashion at November 30, 2006 07:32 PM (FJlmX)

7 They don't care, High Fashion. They honestly don't. Their mandate is to take over the world, period. They even have a word in their religion that means it's perfectly okay to lie at will if that lie will help them take over the world. I don't think their religion has a world for hypocrisy.

Posted by: Ogre at November 30, 2006 07:56 PM (oifEm)

8 Ogre,
"They even have a word in their religion that means it's perfectly okay to lie at will if that lie will help them take over the world."

It's called taqiyya (There are variant spellings). Anything uttered which furthers the cause of Allah is permissible.

Muslims are using our freedoms against us. Brigitte Gabriel has frequently mentioned that, and in her speeches delineates how that happened in Lebanon a few decades ago. Beirut used to be an open city--and a thriving one, at that. No longer!

And let's not forget that Hezbollah was democratically elected in Lebanon. The same is happening here as Muslims take political office and start pushing their agenda.

I believe that before long (within 2 years?) we could well see that any criticism of Islam will be a crime known as hate speech. Ellison and Conyers are going to try to see to that. And here's another strategy the liberals are using, the old bait-and-switch:

http://northernvirginiastan.blogspot.com/2006/11/jerry-kleins-spoof.html

The entire scenario of the future awaiting America is damned depressing.

Posted by: Always On Watch at November 30, 2006 11:27 PM (Eodj2)

9 Ogre:

We do need to do something. Last week I wrote letters to both my Senators and to my Congressman. Still waiting for a response from one Senator and one Congressman. The letter I did get was just a form letter and never addressed any of my questions and concerns.

How the hell do we get them to listen to us? Will we have to march on Washington? What if a million Americans descended on Washington and loudly proclaim that we oppose ANY other law but the law of the Constitution and of our Judeo Christian heritage? What if we all started to peacefully demonstrate everywhere?

Can we do this? We must wake them up!

Posted by: atheling2 at December 01, 2006 05:12 AM (+7zTe)

10 I know you're on top of this, AOW. I just wish there was some way to stop it.

Atheling2, what do you want government to do? The muslims who are taking over aren't breaking the law -- that's my point. We can demonstrate against them, but there's no way to stop them using our current form of government. That's why this is so damn depressing. They're using our good nature and our freedoms to destroy this once-great country.

Posted by: Ogre at December 01, 2006 12:30 PM (oifEm)

11 I'm not talking about the Muslims and whether or not they are breaking the law. I'm talking about Congress introducing any legislation which gives Muslims special "civil rights." I'm also talking about Keith Ellison swearing in on the Koran, instead of the Bible. Why is it that he has special treatment? Did Joe Leiberman use the Torah? Nope!

It's this treating Muslims with "special" consideration that must be stopped. School programs which are endorsed by the UN to teach the joys of being a Muslim in Calif and Oregon, which were funded by the Saudis goes on right now. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected parents' appeal to have this nonsense removed, which blatantly violates separation of Church and State.

You'll find more evidence of this kind of alarming patterns in our nation at Jihad Watch.

Posted by: atheling2 at December 02, 2006 10:17 PM (+7zTe)

12 It's incredibly scary, isn't it? Muslims are winning. Muslims are taking over this country before our eyes.

Posted by: Ogre at December 03, 2006 01:44 AM (ECkKW)

13 Well, that's why I think we have to start considering action: peaceful demonstrations, grass roots efforts to spread awareness, even civil disobedience.

I'm going to post something about a letter writing campaign for everyone to send to their Senators and Congressmen. We have to wake these people up!

I don't want to see our nation go down the tubes like Europe!

Posted by: atheling2 at December 03, 2006 11:55 PM (+7zTe)

14 But government cannot DO anything, short of banning the religion outright. I'm not sure there's anything wrong with that, but I don't see any way Democrats, or even Republicans, would ever consider doing that.

The only hope is for individuals, without government, to convince the muslims to give up their religion and their murderous ways.

Posted by: Ogre at December 03, 2006 11:59 PM (ECkKW)

15 . . by clicking on the upper hyperlink below, you'll bring up the graphic that illustrates my proposed concept for a 9/11 memorial , , ,'

. . . oh, yeah, you might think that the "circled A" detail looks familiar . . . well, it is . . . it was lifted from a royalty-free photo of the moon . . .

. . . as for why the moon should figure so significantly in this memorial, well, let me tell you it took me quite a while to get some inkling as to the REAL motivation of the "gollums", who either rammed or attempted to ram those airline jets into civilian targets . . .

. . . anyway, after viewing the graphic, please consider clicking on the hyperlink just underneath the first hyperlink mentioned . . . I believe the text at the other end divulges in precise and concise terms just what the hell was in the back of the mind of those bloodthirsty antiquated poltroons . . .


proposed 9/11 memorial

. . . oh, yeah, you might be put off a bit by the text . . . okay, so it's only fair to mentioned the blog post in question may be unsuited for perusal by people with squeamish disposition . . .


torture works


toodles

Posted by: he who is known as sefton at December 05, 2006 01:03 AM (H49Bd)

16 Sorry, the links didn't come through.

Posted by: Ogre at December 05, 2006 01:41 AM (ECkKW)






Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0165 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0127 seconds, 24 records returned.
Page size 21 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.