Stem Cell Breakthrough!
There has been an incredible breakthrough in stem-cell research. For the first time, stem cells have been successfully used to cure a woman of being a paraplegic. This has never happened before -- all uses of stem cells were all theoretical -- no actual use had ever been found.
But you won't find this is the news many places. You won't find out that a woman who was paralyzed for 19 years suddenly was able to feel and move her legs, due to stem cells. Why? Because it was done with adult stem cells, and not stem cells obtained from killing a baby. Recent activity in the news has suggested that we NEED baby stem cells, to cure everything from cancer to blindness. Since we can only get those cures from killing babies, we need to continue abortions on demand. Seriously, that's the argument. But now we've actually used stem cells to heal someone, but these stem cells are adult stem cells that were obtained without killing a human. That doesn't fit with the agenda of the pro-abortion left (including Planned Parenthood, the ACLU, the news media, and the Democrat Party), so you won't hear it reported.
Comments
I don't believe in unwanted pregnancy.
If you don't want it, then don't get pregnant.
I produced booklets for the Planned Parenthood in Nigeria and I never supported ABORTION. I only promoted safer sex.
Posted by: Orikinla Osinachi at October 01, 2005 02:13 PM (fAMw8)
Posted by: Everyman at October 02, 2005 03:36 AM (A/oHQ)
Posted by: Michael_the_Archangel at October 02, 2005 10:06 AM (D+t/s)
Great post Ogre!
Posted by: Smoke Eater at October 02, 2005 10:37 AM (68YeG)
The answer is--there is no research that supports it. None at all. And now the cases are coming forward that stem cells harvested in a more humane manner actually can cure something.
Great post, Ogre!
Posted by: Cao at October 02, 2005 12:17 PM (RyucI)
Everyone else, thanks for stopping by! (I was out of town and didn't get a chance to reply earlier).
Posted by: Ogre at October 02, 2005 07:45 PM (iJFc9)
Nobody on the planet made that argument. Either you're dishonestly setting up a straw man or you're getting your news from some pretty unreliable sources. The embryonic stem cells that people wanted to use for the things that they're using adult stem cells for instead wouldn't come from abortions and abortion has nothing to do with it. They would come from frozen embryos that were left over from fertilization experiments.
Posted by: Adam at October 03, 2005 03:07 AM (kdFEm)
Posted by: Ogre at October 03, 2005 05:51 AM (iJFc9)
Although I'm decidedly pro-choice, I've always been against embryonic stem cell research. The reason is simply this: why set yourself up for a supply/demand situation? What if you do find a cure for alzheimers in embryonic stem cells? What then?
other stem cells, though? Like this kind? Have at 'em.
(*)>
Posted by: birdwoman at October 03, 2005 10:53 AM (vR7Sl)
Posted by: Ogre at October 03, 2005 11:57 AM (/k+l4)
Processing 0.0, elapsed 0.0073 seconds.
18 queries taking 0.0055 seconds, 18 records returned.
Page size 9 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.