April 17, 2005
Political Musings
I was reading an opinion piece on the Fair Tax, at of all places, Gun Muse, when I came across this final paragraph that sums up something I intuitively have felt, but never heard expressed in such a clear manner.
"...This is a political issue and the politics is money. Just keep this in mind at all times as you listen to the argument. If a politician is elected by the most votes and the Republicans are the “Party of the Rich” Then doesn’t that mean they need more rich people.(?) Democrats are the "party of the poor", so that means they need (more)what to get elected?"To express it mathmatically, if party A (A= Republicans) and party B (B= Democrats) each need a majority of C (C= Citizens, and where C is broken into subsets C-1 {rich} and C2 {poor}), and each party needs a majority to gain power. If you posit that party A is the party of C-1 and party B is the party of C-2, it follows that both parties would need to cause the greater number of C to join the either of the subsets of C-1 or C-2 Hence, Party A = >C-1, and party B=>C-2. An election could be expressed as: S/A=(>c-1 +
It logically follows that both parties would espouse policies leading to a greater number of C joining the subset they "stand for", so that they could garner the greatest number of votes and thus remain in power. So WHICH subset do YOU wish to belong to, the "rich" or the "poor"?; keeping in mind that the policies of either party will result in the likelyhood of you belonging to one or the other subset?
It's not really a valid equation(because of the reality that you need the greatest number of both sub-sets), but it is an interesting thought problem of logic. And if you assume that either party will enact policies to boost the number of "their" supporting sub-set, you can, by the rules of logic assume that Democrats want to create more poor people and that Republicans want to create more rich people. I see that logic functioning in many of the programs proposed by either of the parties, if you don't factor in the law of unintended consequences.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 12:10 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
April 16, 2005
Some Tax Day quotes
In honor of the annual Reaming of the Citizenry Day™ otherwise known as Tax Day, here are a few pithy quotes:
“The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.”--Vladimir Lenin “In general, the art of government consists in taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other.”
--Voltaire “Virtually everything is under federal control nowadays except the federal budget.”
--Herman E. Talmadge
“Government does not tax to get the money it needs; government always finds a need for the money it gets.”
--Ronald Reagan “When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.”
--Benjamin Franklin “The government is like a baby’s alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.”
--Ronald Reagan “A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.”
--George Bernard Shaw Thanks to James Hudnall, from whom I
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 10:07 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Agents WILL get their percentage!
A beautiful actress’ long-time agent discovered one day that she’d been selling her body for a thousand dollars a night. The agent, who had long lusted after his gorgeous client, hadn’t dreamed that she had been so readily available. He approached her and, confessing his desire, asked for a date. She shrugged and agreed to spend the night with him, but coldly stated that he would have to pay a thousand dollars, just like the rest of her clients.
Taken somewhat aback because of their relationship, he reluctantly agreed, then added, "But don’t I even get my agent’s ten percent as a discount?" "No discount," she said curtly. "Take it or leave it." Her agent wasn’t all that happy with her attitude, but lust won out and he agreed. When she arrived at his house that evening he took her into the bedroom and screwed the hell out of her. After the passionate encounter, he turned out the lights and she fell asleep. Around midnight, her aroused bedmate awakened her and they engaged in another steamy bout of sex. Towards one a.m. she was again awakened, and her horny lover engaged her in another round of pleasure. An hour later, she was again awakened, and, by now highly impressed at her partner’s virility, she whispered in the darkness, "My God, you’re a stud! I had no idea! I never knew how lucky I was to have you as an agent." "I’m not your agent, baby," a strange voice answered. "He’s at the door selling tickets."Posted by: Delftsman3 at 03:51 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Theft from GI's Mail
If THIS doesn't tick you off, I don't want to know you. That is not the lowest thing I've ever seen, but it's sure close to the bottom.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 03:46 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
MinuteMan Project
Doc Russia over at Bloodletting has an excellant fisk on a story whining about the activities of the MinuteMan Project in Arizona. Give yourself a treat and go read it. And go to the "home" button and read his other posts. Doc is one of the best on the web right now.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 12:38 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
PSA: YOU may help save a life...
Sometime you may observe a fellow worker or family member stumble or act oddly for no apparent reason. If you just remember the following, you just may help save their lives, or more extensive brain damage.
Read and Learn! Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify.Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke. Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions: 1. *Ask the individual to SMILE. 2. *Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS. 3. *Ask the person to SPEAK A SIMPLE SENTENCE. If he or she has trouble with any of these tasks,
call 9-1-1 immediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 12:10 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
April 15, 2005
Vigilante or Hero?
The Arizona Republic has an opinion piece on the recent incident where an Army Reservist held seven illegal's at gunpoint at a rest stop in Arizona.
This is a tough incident to opine about.., I don't think we are at the point where citizens should take it upon themselves to act as LEO's in every incident they observe, BUT this incident just points out just how badly our immigration laws are being flouted, and the officials responsible are not living up to their oaths in enforcing those laws.But there are some attitudes displayed in this piece that I find troubleing.... Take this paragraph for instance: "How different this story would look if it had turned violent. We might be dealing with international repercussions if any of the Mexicans had been hurt. Or bloodshed if Haab had happened upon drug smugglers or desperate coyotes, ready to fight over their human cargo." Number one, just WHY should we care about how a foreign country feels about what happens to one of their citizens if they are engaged in illegal activities in OUR country? (other than that they be treated as human beings and not animals) Number two, I think Haab used his weapon in a reasonable manner to preclude being overcome by these people, had they been drug dealers or "desperate Coyotes". Odds of seven to one would seem to make the use of the weapon an equalizing factor, not an abuse. Then there is the quote by Sherriff Joe Arpiao: "There's no excuse for any citizen to take the law into their own hands. We're a nation of laws." I admire Sherriff Arpiao for his tough stances and his no nonsense attitude, but in this case I believe that he may be incorrect. Haab observed some people committing a federal crime, and he merely held the perpertrators until law enforcment could arrive to take over. Either we are ALL responsible for our societies safety, or we are just sheep to be told where to go and how to behave.
Haab may have overstepped that line between concerned citizen and vigilante, but thats for a court to decide, I am proud that we have citizens willing to take responsiblity on their own initiative though. The op-eds author responded to Sherriff Apiaos comment with: "And America has trained officers to enforce those laws." The FACT is, without the cooperation of the citizenry, we have far too few LEO's to affect any real effect, other than to take the after-action reports on any incidents, and in the case of illegal immigration, a LEO can't even inquire as to a suspects status, and even if they KNOW thay are illegal, are precluded from making an arrest just on that basis, or even reporting it to Immigration officials. That belies that "we have LEOS trained to enforce those laws". When the laws are so blatently being ignored by those responsible to seeing that they are upheld, just what are the citizens to do? It leads to a disdain of the law by the citizens, and eventually, a total breakdown of society.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 11:14 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Free speech and the Internet
Right Wing Rocker has a great post up expressing his feeling on proposed rules on Internet speech. I would write my own post, but he's already said it all.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 10:13 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
April 14, 2005
Another reason to stop Illegals
Well, isn't THIS special.
It seems that Illegal immigrants are interfering with training excercises vital to the readiness of troops being groomed for duty in Iraq, by trying to use the training grounds/firing ranges as incursion corridors into the US. I know it sounds cold blooded, but I have a thought on how to stop this. Mark the areas clearly as kill zones in Spanish, and if any do try to use the range as a free entry zone, use them as targets of opportunity. These people represent a clear danger to our national security, both in the fact that they are interfering with training needed to help our soldiers try to stay alive in a war zone, and that they provide cover to would be terrorists to observe our training to try to defeat those soldiers, as such, I would say that we consider them as enemy combatants, that have received fair warning and terminate with extreme prejudice. I feel sure that, after a few well publicized examples, those illegals that are "innocent" of espionage will learn to avoid these areas. It is a harsh way to deal with the problem, I agree, but I believe that in the long run, it protects the greatest number of lives in the end, both our soldiers and Illegals.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 01:21 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
April 13, 2005
Quote of the Day
"…though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view."
National Review
Jan 11, 1956
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 11:32 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Al Quada Schism?
John Gibson is reporting that there may be a schism in the top leadership of Al Qaeda, with the Nominal leader, Ossama bin Laden, wanting to continue attacking targets in the US, and his number two, Ayman al-Zawahiri, wanting to take controll of another Muslim country to provide for a base of operations to replace the one they had in Afghanistan from which to spread their terrorism. His target of choice seems to be Saudi Arabia.
It would seem that Zawahiri is taking the long term position, while Osama just wants to concentrate on the "Great Satan". IF this schism is reality, it would be to our benefit to exploit it. As much as I find the present government In Saudi Arabia to be an abhorrent dictatorship, if we don't support their efforts to defend their autonomy, we may find that we will have a much worse enemy to contend with there in the near future. I am wondering if we may just be able to use this opportunity to steer the Saudi government onto a path more ameaneable to the freedom of it's citizens? We do need to help provide protection to the Kingdom to prevent it from becomeing an Al Quada tool, but there is no reason that that protection can't come with a price tag for the present Saudi system. Those on the Left have long accused the West of propping up dictatorships in the ME, and to some extent they are correct; that we did interfere somewhat with the internal politics of the region. It must be realized however that sometimes you have to deal with what is, to prevent something worse, and with oil reseves there vitaly necessary to the economic well being of the Industrialized West, it may be that some of the past actions were justified in the context of the times. It must also be remembered that most of the administrations that conducted those past actions were controlled by the Democrats, so it's disingenious of them to try to proclaim their innocence in those actions now. Now however, there is a new paradiegm, and a chance to change the ME for the better, especially for it's own resident population. We cannot let past actions make us fear to seize the opportunity to effect dramatic change now. The future existance of a free West is depending upon it. Otherwise, we will founder under continual war against those for whom the West represents everything they despise in their religious fanatacism, and the common residents of the ME will suffer even worse than we will, at least initially.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 11:28 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Barbarians We ARE
I've been in many arguments with GFW's about WHY I feel the need to possess fierearms. They tell me that the only reason to have a firearm is if I intend to participate in a war zone or act as a duly authorized Law Enforcement Officer(LEO).
Well, I was a LEO for over 10 years. I have seen the underbelly of our society and dealt with the barbarians inhabiting that zone. And make no mistake, they ARE barbarians. We as a people have delegated responsibility for our safety to units of government embodied in the Military for the outside forces and the LEO's for those barbarians within our own walls that would do us harm. Then we proceeded to try to tell ourselves that we were safe, and we didn't need to worry on our own personal level, thats what the Police were for. We forgot that "society" is an artificial construct; and it only functions smoothly and safely when all of us play by exactly the same rules and moral codes. The fact is that basic Human Nature IS NOT, and WILL NEVER BE as benign as we would have it in society. That drive to strive to overcome and to possess is in all of is to various degrees. In fact, we need that drive, channelled in appropiate ways, to maintain a society at all; without it, society becomes stagnant and withers away. I have never been able to articulate what I mean by my views, and then, as I was surfing through my usual haunts, Kim du Toit(be sure to add him to YOUR daily reads!) pointed me to a post that articulates it perfectly, to where even the most devout GFW must stop and ponder "Hmmm, he may have a point there, I just wonder..." before they lapse back into their familiar rut of indoctrination and cry for yet another restriction of our 2nd. Amendment rights to "protect them from people that think that way". My main point is that we are, by nature, Barbarians. Civilization has put a thin veneer over our basic nature and makes it seem that we have advanced over the millenia, but in reality, we have only channeled those basic impulses in the strictures of sociatal norms that allow us to use those impulses in ways that don't overtly harm others, at least for the most part. When we forget that those impulses are there, and let our guard down the slightest bit, society begins to break down and our true natures come once again to the fore. In the final analysis, might does make right. We are all animals, some of us predators and some of us natural prey, the difference we have over all the other animals in the world is, we can chose whether to REMAIN prey, or whether we will prey on the weaker just at this moment...we have choice in the matter. The GFW's have made the choice to remain sheep, protected by the shepherds of government; unfortunatly, they would try to force that same choice on those of us who, while we ARE predators, do not chose to predate, at least today. We will not mildly accept the pulling of our fangs, it isn't within our nature to do so. They should be gratefull that it is not, for the time will come yet again, when we will be the "civilized barbarians" that are defending them from those that have totally given themselves over to their true predatory nature.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 09:11 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
RCOB Story
Mamamontezz got an e-mail from our friend Jack that made her so livid that she was ready to start punching holes in the wall. She's normally very slow to anger and is willing to hear all sides of an argument before joining in, but this bit of news got her so angry that I had to wait to read her post about it before she would even tell me anything about it.
I was as angry as she was after reading the sparse information given in the story. It is minimal reporting on a situation rich in anger provoking items. 1. A pack of animals posing as human students attacked a developmentally challenged girl, punching her in the mouth to make her compliant to their will. 2. They forced this girl to perform fellatio on at least two members of the pack. 3. One of the members of the pack video'd at least part of the assault. 4. There were other students present that watched the assault and DID NOTHING. 5. An assistant principle requested of the father of the victom to not notify the police. 6. As of yet, four students were suspended from school for their part in the attack, pending investigation for furthur action and NO (POLICE) CHARGES HAVE BEEN FILED.Okay...let me try to voice my thoughts through my RCOB and see if I can be coherent....It seems that we are raising some of our young as wild animals that believe that they can do anything they wish and get away with it, and the initial response by all the officials involved seems to back up that belief. Whats worse, even the bystanders have been indoctrinated into the "let the police handle it" mentality that they did nothing to stop this show of animalistic brutality. In my school days, I sincerely believe that after that first punch to the victoms mouth, the assailent would have been taken down by at least half of the onlookers and received some serious, physical, "attitude adjustment"; we were taught that it was NEVER permissible to hit a girl, much less assault her and gang rape her. Also in my school days, any adult in the area, much less any of the administrators of the school, would have been the first to call the police and would have requested that those involved be arrested and charged to the fullest extant possible. For that assistant principle/principle to have done what they did constitutes abetting a felony after the fact in my lexicon, and those persons should be charged as such. The fact that they were in a position of authority only ascerbates the action that they chose to follow instead of what any normal person would have done. I credit the father that he did contact the police and didn't go vigilanti on the perpertrators....I'm not sure,speaking as the father of two daughters, that I would be able to control myself as well as he did if such an assault had occurred to one of my daughters. I like to think that my training as a LEO would preclude me from going mideavel on their buts, but that same training would scream at me to "get those little M***erF****rs" and don't be gentle about it. Those bystanders that watched everything happen and did nothing should have to pay some consequences also...they may not be liable in a criminal sense, but common decency should have moved them to intercede... This incident occurred LAST MONTH, and NO charges have been filed as of yet?!? I know that the wheels of the judicial system run slow, but it is inexcusable that the prosecutors haven't filed at least preliminary charges against the offenders as of yet. I can only hope that it is because they are going to try to charge these barbarians in the adult court to face adult time...lets see....assault with bodily injury, rape of a minor, criminal confinement of a minor come to mind...should be good for at least 15 to 25 in the State Gray-Bar Hotel (hopefully with an inmate for a cellmate that has a taste for the younger men in his life and a hearty sexual appitite.) Nope, I can't be coherant on this right now....I'm off to the range to take out some righteous anger on some poor defenseless paper targets.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 02:37 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
April 11, 2005
Iraqi Comments
Here are some views of the the new Iraq from those who should know best, the Iraqi citizens themselves. Notice the underlying theme: personal freedom unknown under Saddam.
Also notice the biggest complaint: lack of security. Ask yourselves just WHO is causing that fear and you will know just why we can't leave Iraq to her own devices just yet. We took away the protective element, and until the Iraqis can provide for themselves a new protective system, we owe them the best we can do. The Iraqis are learning something now that all too many of us in the safe environs of a mature democracy seem to have forgotten, freedom entails risk, and eternal vigilence against those that would provide security at the cost of freedom, both from external, and internal factions. I pray that the Iraqis come to realize that the government that governs least, governs best. I only pray that we remember that lesson too, before it's too late. In that vein, allow me a mini-rant: Many of the social programs that the Left have been espousing are great sounding, and come from a compassionate urge to aid those less fortunate, but the law of unintended consequences must always be kept in mind; every one of these programs passed into action gives the government yet another piece of control over our individual freedom and personal autonomy, and in slow, incremental ways, cause government to become an oppressive and restrictive force hemming in every individual. There has to be a balance between compassion and freedom, even if that freedom might lead to an individual failure. Eternal vigilence, and, sometimes, a seemingly hard-hearted refusal of the public magniminaty, are the only bulwarks against this slow encroachment on personal freedom. The main problem of the Left is that they have forgotten is that, sometimes, freedom means the freedom to fail. Results are never guarenteed, only the freedom to strive for success is what our system is all about. There is no such thing as "just a little socialism". Socialism is a festering malignancy on the body politic that will always encroach and kill the body if allowed any growth. A small growth, once established, will always feed itself first in a never-ending attempt to expand it's boundries and scope.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 10:43 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
April 10, 2005
Inheritance
Due to inherit a fortune when his sickly, widower father died, Robert decided he needed a woman to enjoy it with.
So he went to a singles bar and he searched until he spotted a woman whose beauty took his breath away."Right now, I'm just an ordinary man," he said, walking up to her, "but within a month or two, my father will pass and I'll inherit over 20 million dollars." The woman went home with Robert, and four days later she became his stepmother.
Men will never learn.
H/T top Jack for the truism
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 08:07 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Do we need a new Constitution?
George Soros is at it again, this time sponsering a conferance of the Elite at Yale to formulate a new Constitution with the goal of substituting it for our present Constitution in 2020..
Go through the links and see some of the proposals.....A "right" to a job "at a fair rate of pay", a "right" for a farmer to sell his products at a rate that suports his family....a "right" to have a higher education, a "right" to own a home, a "right" to health care, to name just a few. Tell me, just HOW are these "rights" to be achieved whithout giving the government the ultimate control over every aspect of our lives? The founding Fathers were wise in saying we have the Right to "pursue Happiness". Note that they didn't guarentee that anyone would achieve it, just that you had the right to strive for it. True success only comes through individual effort, government can never ensure equal outcomes, unless the outcome you desire is equal misery for all. The frightening thing is that these are the people that will become our next generation of lawyers, judges, and polititians; that they could seriously debate this as a viable course of action bodes extremely ill for the Republic in the coming years. The time for the Second American Revolution may soon be upon us....and as Shakespeare suggested: "First, kill all the lawyers!", may have to become more than a cute phrase.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 03:18 AM | Comments (9) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
One Soldier's Opinion
Here is an open letter from one of our soldiers in Iraq to the oh so brave antiwar protesters at Ohio University.
Marc Fencil is one of many examples that we have reason to be proud of the young men serving in the military forces. If you want to give him an "attaboy", you can e-mail him at : marc.fencil@ohiou.edu. Be warned though, if you use that address to slander Marc or his compatriots, I will hunt you down like the dog you are.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 02:43 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Some Random Thoughts
When in the course of human events..... so begins one most important documents in world history... It put forth a truly novel idea, that all people had rights, just by virtue of existing. It stated that these rights were endowed to us by the creator of the universe. (Yes, contrary to what some revisionists would have you believe, every one of the Founding Fathers DID believe in a Supreme Deity, although they did not agree on many forms of how to regard it)
This was the most revolutionary idea they espoused. That people naturally had the right to exist, be free, and to be allowed to pursue that which made them happy. That these rights were a part of existance, not granted by a government or priesthood. Too many people today seem to have forgotten this idea; looking to government to provide for their every need, or even wish, they may have. Today we have a Judiciary that seems all too eager to deprive the sick and/or elderly, and the yet unborn, to that basic right of life. We have people of all political persuasions trying to enforce their ideas on the general populace. (I believe mostly from the Left, no doubt those on the Left think it's mostly a desire of the Right) Whichever side it originates from, our freedom is constantly under assault from those who feel "they know better". This makes "the pursuit of happiness" an almost meaningless phrase. I believe that it may be time for a second American Revolution. Hopefully, a bloodless one; where we reassert the principles that we were founded on.We need to re-educate our young to our real history, with all it's blemishes, and all its noble ideals. The PC founded crap they teach now is nothing more than indoctrination to Group-think socialism. Don't think so? They started earlier in Europe, look to see what the results are there. Stagnant, or falling, economies, tax rates that in some cases approach 80-90%, innovation stifled by beaucracy that our government wonks can only dream of. Name the good or service, and it is controlled by some government board or other, in regard to it's delivery, cost, and materials used, and woe to he that tries to break out of the mold. Yes, there is universal health care....if you can survive the wait long enough to be treated, and treatments decided by government fiat, not by health care professionals. Doctors are nothing more than skilled professionals on the level of good plumbers or electricians. Innovation in medicine is frowned upon...after all, "that isn't the way we've always done it". Ever wonder WHY almost 90% of all new treatments and drugs come from America? Just look to Universal Health Care and the attitude it engenders, and you will have your answer. The Left must come to realize that real freedom requires real personal responsibility. It sounds nice that we are our brothers keeper, and, spiritually, I believe we are, but trying to provide a total "safety net" that allows no one to utterly fail, in the end, also allows no one to succeed to their full potential, and in the end, leads to tyranny over all. The Right also has to learn that we must be allowed the freedom to fail; and that government is best that governs least. We can not legislate morality, we can only instill it in the education of our young from the beginning of their academic careers. The Right has abdicated education to the so-called "experts" of the NEA, and in doing so, has sown the seeds of the destruction of the republic. The single greatest force for the ultimate downfall of our Republic is the ACLU and their compatriot activist judges that have forgotten that is NOT their job to write the law, their only job is to apply the law equally to all. Remember people, the phrase is freedom OF religion, NOT freedom FROM religion. The ACLU has taken their anti-religion crusade to the ultimate idiotic extremes. I am not an adherent to any particular religious way, but I have to acknowledge that exposure to religion in many forms in my youth ultimately led to my moral sense of self, and I suspect that is the case for many of my generation and earlier. We may not follow the forms, but the basic philosophy was incultated in us from an early age. Looking at the activities and proclivities of many of the young, I have to say that I feel sorry that they didn't have the same sense of the spiritual exposed to them. I don't think that Columbine and some of the other recent incidents would have happened had that happened.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 12:57 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Yo Momma!
In my never ending quest to offend everyone, I decided to pass on this E-mail I got from someone with obviously a little too much time on his hands....
Yo Momma is SOOOO Fat... When she dances she makes the band skip When she was diagnosed with the flesh eating disease, the doctor gaveher 13 years to live She puts mayonnaise on aspirin
Her butt has its own congressman
Her cereal bowl came with a lifeguard
When she goes to the zoo the elephants throw her peanuts
Her high school graduation picture was an aerial photograph
Her driver's license says "picture continued on other side"
The back of her neck looks like a pack of hot dogs
All the restaurants in town have signs that say "Maximum Occupancy:
240 patrons or Yo mama"
When she ran away, they had to use all four sides of the milk carton
When she gets in an elevator, it has no choice but to go down
She was born with a silver shovel in her mouth
She's got smaller fat women orbiting around her I had to take a train and two buses just to get on her good side They had to grease a door frame and hold a Twinkie on the other side
to get her through
Her nickname is "daaamn!!"
She has to iron her pants on the driveway
She's on both sides of the family
When I yell "Kool-aid," she comes crashing through the wall
She could sell shade When she crosses the street, cars look out for her People jog around her for exercise She gets runs in her jeans
Her blood type is Ragu
When she goes to a restaurant, she doesn't get a menu, she gets an
estimate
If she got her shoes shined, she'd have to take his word for it!
She has to put her belt on with a boomerang When she turns around, people throw her a welcome back party She can't even jump to a conclusion
She went to the movies and sat next to everyone Her belly button doesn't have lint, it has sweaters She was walking down the street, I swerved to miss her, and ran out of
gas and of course...... yo momma is so fat that when she wears her Malcolm X t- shirt,
helicopters land on her back.
Posted by: Delftsman3 at 12:40 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Poem
Mamamontezz has put up a thought-provoking Poem on the situation in Georgia involving yet another victom of the judicial system. Follow the links, get angry, and put out your thoughts on this travesty.
In short, we have an elderly woman with a medical problem, not currently life threatening, who has a living will that states she wishes to be cared for, but has been placed in Hospice without the benifit of a feeding tube or hydration, because her "oh so loving" grand-daughter feels that it's time for "her to go to Jesus". The patients closest living relatives (a brother and sister) objected, so the grand-daughter got a judge to grant her guardianship (in a manner patently against Georgia state law) to allow her to continue the starvation/dehydration course that she set for her Grandmother. Mind you, this woman is NOT comotose, does NOT have a life threatening illness (other than the treatment her "guardian" imposes), AND has a living will stating that she wishes food and water unless she becomes vegatative. Yet the Judge (without a law degree, or seemingly, any knowledge of Georgia law) sides with the person who wishes to starve this woman to death. Terri Schiavo was just the start down that slippery slope, it seems that the Judiciary wants to accelerate our progress down that slope at an ever faster pace. The first caqse is always the hardest....now there is precedent to quicken the descent....May God have mercy on us all, for we are definately not showing it to each other.Posted by: Delftsman3 at 12:26 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment | Trackbacks (Suck)
Processing 0.02, elapsed 0.0835 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.0749 seconds, 51 records returned.
Page size 72 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.