Rocket Jones
June 13, 2005
The new Axis of Evil?
GreenPeace
PETA
Amnesty International
Because with them, it's their way or no way, and we've all heard how that kind of black & white thinking is wrong.
Posted by: Ted at
05:55 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
wow, and you harass me about quippy off the cuff inflammatory comments

Posted by: Oorgo at June 13, 2005 11:45 AM (lM0qs)
2
You have better manners than I do in someone else's comments.

Posted by: Ted at June 13, 2005 04:07 PM (+OVgL)
3
It's everything I can do to keep from going fuckin' ballistic right now.First,Ted,you tease me by bringing up the Second Ammendment now you throw these self-righteous lyin' ass liberal hippie freaks at me? You're trying to give me a stroke aren't you?
You know,even though I don't do politics I still can't stand a wussy ass liberal crybaby.Simply put these ass wipes are all dangerous.The sooner they're gotten rid of the better for everyone.That goes for their freakin PC shit,too.Sorry but NO! you don't have a right not to be offended.You do have a right to walk away when you don't agree with me just as I you.Don't like it?Tuff shit!Believe me when I say that checks and balances isn't worth it.Then again C&B was never suppose to be about one side of a debate being totally full of shit and hell bent on destroying every basic principal this nation was founded on either.
Also,you are only fooling yourself when you make up bullshit and try to pass it off as prime rib.Do you all really think we're that stupid?
BTW,if you're one of the gullible,moronic dumbasses who happens to be braindead enough to follow these cum belchin' shitty dick lickers then perhaps you should drop by activistcash.com and check out who you human heros in the pink tights are sleeping with.
Speaking of bullshit have you ever wondered where this trash comes from?Check out Penn and Teller's Bullshit:College on Showtime for an eye opener.
Gun control?Sorry asshole but it's a Bill of Rights and NOT a Bill of Needs.Also,if you wanna argue that then you don't NEED more than one car,or more than one painting on your wall.You don't NEED to read more than one newspaper...blah....blah....Get it?If you wanna throw that "need" shit around then let me tell that I can disappear into the woods right now and live just as fullfilling and comfortable a life as I can here at home.All the while the only thing I'll "need" is a sharp knife,a ball of string and a .22 pistol.I wonder how many city bound liberal wussy woodsman wannabees will follow me?None I'll bet.
Plus,don't throw that "guns where only supposed to be for the army" shit at me either because i'll throw back dozens of quotes from early Americans,including our forefathers,at you that prove otherwise.Sorry dipshit but this is America,I'm an America,I want to shoot my gun so I will.Period!Don't like it?Then fuckin' leave!
while we're on the subject of guns let me take a moment and explain why it is that libs hate them.You see it is much easier for libs to pick on a harmless mechanical device than to admit that their own liberal free for all lifestyle is the root of most problems,especially murder.These people don't believe in God so they haven't a higher authority to answer to when they act like degenerates or let's coddle the crook and just blame the gun."Oh,but if he din't have a gun he would have never killed".Bullshit!For thousands of years manking went without guns and they did a pretty damb good job of slicing and dicing each other back then.
Let me tell you a story about me.Growing up in the mountains of Va. I always carried a gun with me everywhere I went.Very much the thing to have handy when you're in the woods miles from anywhere as we often where.Everyone else I grew up with was the same way.Whenever we would walk to the store we always knew who was inside by who's gun was on the porch.It had been this way for hundreds of years.Now did any of us ever kill each other?NO!Playing football and winding up in a fight did any of us ever feel tempted to pick up his gun only feet away and shoot the other?NO!Why?Because we had christian family morals and values.Something that libs care nothing about.A fight is a fight and defending yer home or your life is another story.Lib terds don't believe you have a right to defend yourself.However,if you kill someone else you do have a right to not go to jail.After all the gun made you do it.Right?To them even if you do try to kill someone and get shot you are a VICTIM of gun violence.Don't believe me?Don't think they're that bad?Check this out:http://www.niagara-gazette.com/story.asp?id=1776
this should put a knot in yer bloomers.
Now as for animals if I am bearing down on a big ol' buck with my .300 weatherby he has a right be killed quickly and cleanly by me in a sane and humane fashion.He also has a right to not be wasted unnecessarily.Beyond that PETA can kiss the fattest,whitest part of my venison fed ass.To make this long story short don't buy into their "caring about the animals" shit.Most "animal rights" activist care very little about animals.In fact I love confronting these idiots on Yahoo and watching them flunk out of the most rudiment trivia about animals,their habitat,natural resources management and the environment in general.Most of these people really are stupid.That's why they're so quick to just readily accept any old junk science that comes along.All you have to do is make sure that your "research" makes humans look bad.Being as how most "animal rights" activists are really just anti-human activists in disguise that's usually all it takes.
Well gotta go.To wrap this up i'll ask a favor.If you are a liberal tree huggin,gun grabbin,butt pumpin hippie freak then please do the environment a REAL favor by finding the tallest building you can and taking a flyin fuckin leap!
Oh,and one last note.How long do you think you'll be able to exercise your First Ammendment right to make up lies and run yer freakin' yap after you succeed in taking away my Second Ammendment rights?If you said anything besides "not long" then you really are stupid and probably should be queer just so you won't fuckin' breed.
Posted by: Russ at June 13, 2005 08:02 PM (ObxzR)
4
Dang Russ, first you ask if I'm trying to give you a stroke and then you practically have one.
Calm, my friend.

Posted by: Ted at June 13, 2005 08:33 PM (+OVgL)
5
Wow Russ... that just...
wow
Posted by: Oorgo at June 14, 2005 06:42 PM (lM0qs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Fallen Heroes Memorial
Recently at Mookie's high school, they held a ceremony to dedicate a new memorial. Gar-Field High School has lost two alumni in Iraq, and another school in our county, Hylton High, lost two more, including one last week. I've heard that there is another one or two from other schools, but I don't have any solid information about that.
The write-up was in the
local paper, but because I'm not confident that their links will last for any length of time, I've reprinted almost the
entire article in the extended entry (
click below on "light this candle...").
One interesting note. I've heard that while setting up this memorial, a search was made for similar things done at other schools. Apparently, their research turned up the fact that no school has dedicated a permanent Memorial to the military since midway through the Vietnam War. This was attributed to the fact that wartime memorials fell out of favor at that time because of the general anti-war and anti-military feelings of the public. Take that with a grain of salt, because although I thought it interesting enough to mention, it's all second-and-third-hand information.
In any case, I'm very proud of the school for doing this. Mookie and Robyn were at the dedication, and they said it was a moving and emotional event. Pictures of the memorial will be posted in the next day or two (assuming Rachael gets a few moments between classes).
Posted by: Ted at
05:04 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
It ain't all rockets all the time
Sometimes NASA flies balloons.
The westward flight from Esrange [Sweden - RJ] to Alaska will test NASA's new long-lasting balloon vehicle and carries a 5,940-pound telescope at an altitude of 25 miles for six to nine days.
These are huge balloons. For example, an NFL football field is 300 feet long.
The balloon is 396 feet high and 462 feet in diameter. It is made of advanced materials and uses a pumpkin-shaped design to achieve flights up to 100 days. It holds up to 1.3 million cubic yards of helium.
Some interesting stuff happening. Who knew Sweden had a space corporation?
Posted by: Ted at
04:42 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Cool stuff,Ted.I actually belong to a balloon research group on Yahoo.I remember a couple of years ago a few fellas tied to do a balloon assisted launch at one of the LDRS launched but winds canceled it.I wonder if they ever got it off the ground?
Posted by: Russ at June 13, 2005 08:09 PM (ObxzR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 12, 2005
Movie Quote
From Mystery Men.
"We're on a blind date with destiny, and she just ordered the lobster." -- The Shoveler
This flick is available in the $5.50 discount bin at WalMart.
Posted by: Ted at
09:42 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
A good, but slightly twisted movie.
Posted by: GEBIV at June 12, 2005 03:10 PM (peIpU)
2
That movie cracks me up.
Posted by: Susie at June 14, 2005 11:45 AM (PWYyH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bub's in hiding
Because the guys over at the Ministry of Minor Perfidy are talking handguns, and rating them by the only scale that really matters: its effectiveness as an anti-zombie weapon.
Check out
the latest object of my lust the
Kimber .45 ACP and the
Smith & Wesson 686P in .38/.357 Magnum.
I love the original Model 1911's, and owned an earlier version of the S&W, which was a fine weapon. Go read the reviews, and don't forget to lock your doors and windows at night, just in case Bub gets hungry.
Posted by: Ted at
08:54 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Guns GOOD. Zombies BAD.
My Colt .45 is my primary anti-zombie weapon, cuz I have the most ammo- 185gr Blue Dot JHP- in clips ready to go for it.
2nd comes my S&W Model 19 .357 with 2 speedloaders of Fed HS 158gr JHP ready to go.
Final line of anti-zombie defense is the weapon I call Gotterdammerung, my nickel-plated 6.5in S&W Model 29, The .44 Magnum, with 2 speedloaders of Winchester 230gr JHP ready to go.
If I expend all ammo and there's still zombies left, I will go to the chainsaw.
Posted by: BDJ at June 14, 2005 08:21 AM (kKjaJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Recent television trends
I saw someone (sorry, forgot who) mentioned that new show "Hit Me Baby One More Time" or whatever it's called, and that you get to *vote* on which washed-up relic was the best during the episode. It's getting so that you can't have a program anymore without a viewer vote. Before you know it, on "The L Word" you'll be deciding who gets to eat who.
Posted by: Ted at
07:35 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
*Before you know it, on "The L Word" you'll be deciding who gets to eat who.*
Seriously, that's when you'll be seeing a rise in demand (ahem) of 3-D goggles.

Posted by: dawn at June 12, 2005 11:42 AM (Dh1V0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 11, 2005
You might not get this if you're not a PC geek
Yeah, right. Who am I kidding?
Posted by: Ted at
09:49 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Oh, my. What other fun html script have I been missing out on?!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at June 12, 2005 11:34 AM (nOyDe)
2
Ahh, so that's my problem. I must have a typo in my code. Once I debug, I'll be a C cup...
Posted by: nic at June 13, 2005 07:08 PM (gCsDB)
3
Not a bug, it's a feature.

Posted by: Ted at June 13, 2005 08:44 PM (+OVgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Baseball and Bloggers
Our next blogger get-together will be on June 25th at the Prince William County Stadium to watch the Washington Nationals farm club play the Baltimore Orioles farm club. This could be the start of a long and heated rivalry.
I'll be there for sure, and I believe the rest of the family is in this time too.
Rob & Big Hair have confirmed as well.
Last time we got a block of seats and they were pretty darn good at only $9.00 each. We had a great time, so c'mon out!
Posted by: Ted at
09:44 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
I have a work "thing" that day. And have to cook for it, no less! Bah! I'll catch the next game, though. Have fun, guys and girls!
Posted by: dawn at June 12, 2005 11:44 AM (Dh1V0)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Faith in Me, Faith in You
For Dawn, because she has more of this than anyone else I know, even when she doesn't quite believe it herself.
Faith in Me, Faith in You
A single mother with two children
Makes lunches in the morning
And on her way to work she drops them off at school
And tells them
Faith in me
Faith in you
A farmer kneels in his fields with dust
Running through his fingers
Says "I'm gonna lose you if it don't rain real soon"
He looks up and says
Faith in me
Faith in you
Oh, I have to have faith
That's where it all starts
I know I have to have faith in myself
It's free and it's found right here in my heart
When I think about things and all the dreams I wanna see come true
Let me tell you just what I do
I take a look in the mirror and I smile and say
Have faith in me
Faith in you
In the shadows of the city
By the banks of the river
From the doorway of his cardboard room
A man cries out
Faith in me
Faith in you
Before the poverty and prejudice
All the hunger and pain
And the social injustice, just watch the boss' reign*
Here 'em sing
Faith in me
Faith in you
Oh, I have to have faith
That's where it all starts
I know I have to have faith in myself
It's free and it's found right here in my heart
When I think about things and all the dreams I wanna see come true
Let me tell you just what I do
I take a look in the mirror and I smile and say
Have faith in me
Faith in you
I take a look in the mirror and I smile and say
Have faith in me
Faith in you
-- Doug Stone
Every last one of us is stronger than we realize. All too often people give up on themselves long before they break.
*
that "boss' reign"
line is probably incorrect, but it's the best I can figure out from listening to the song and I can't find the lyrics on Google.
Posted by: Ted at
08:35 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
My wife is really annoyed with me right now
I started wearing glasses sometime around the 5th grade I think, and my wife started wearing hers in elementary school as well. My wife's eyes are constantly changing, and there have been times when she's gotten a brand new prescription twice in one year. Me, I tend to wear out glasses. Not from rough handling, but from age, because my prescription has changed very little over the years. I'll wear a pair of glasses until they're practically falling apart before getting a new pair, and most of the time the prescription stays the same or doesn't change enough to bother with.
I should mention here that my wife is a few years younger than I am. That matters because she's a practical woman, yet she has her little vanities like the rest of us. I wouldn't say she was devastated when she found out last year that she needed bifocals, but she certainly wasn't happy about it. Thank goodness for the "no-line" style that's available now. She took great solace in the fact that I'm older and therefore would be likely to need bifocals myself the next time I got my
head eyes examined. You may recall that she used to manage an optometrist office, so she knows how to work most of the toys and equipment, and she knows of which she speaks.
On Thursday Robyn, Rachael and I went to the eye doctor for our checkup. The good news is that we all have fine healthy eyes. Glaucoma testing showed excellent pressure levels for each of us, and we got nutrition advice to help ward off
Macular Degeneration, which runs in my side of the family (green leafy veggies and zinc). Rachael finally got glasses (she's been borderline for quite a while), while Robyn's eyes are perfect.
The bad news is that my eyes are indeed changing as I grow older. I'll order a new pair of glasses in the next month or so because mine are pretty rickety after three years. Same prescription, because that didn't change enough to matter.
Per doctor's orders, I'm supposed to take my glasses off from now on when I read. Yep, Liz is *really* annoyed with me right now.
Posted by: Ted at
08:07 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
My glasses now come off for fine work---which means I'm constantly lose them as I go from reading a book or working on the computer to doing dishes.
I've got to get one of those cords that teachers and librarians use. I know other's use them as well, but that's the first thing I think of when I see glasses hanging about the neck.
Posted by: Rachel Ann at June 11, 2005 05:35 PM (Jgwqx)
2
Don't fear the second opinion.
While in high school, the optometrist I saw assigned me bifocals. In HIGH SCHOOL! I thought I was doomed.
However, another optometrist looked me over in college, and I got non-bifocal glasses.
I guess I answered more correctly on the 1 or 2 things.
Posted by: Brian J at June 11, 2005 11:26 PM (V04ml)
3
Dang. I have bifocals in my *cycling* glasses. And since my insurance won't pay for lineless...I'm gonna look like a real 'tard on overcast/cloudy/rainy days.
Posted by: Victor at June 12, 2005 07:13 PM (YjY77)
4
I've always had to take my glasses off to read, so I'm always looking for the darn things! They do, however, seem to wander off more frequently lately....
Posted by: Susie at June 14, 2005 11:50 AM (PWYyH)
5
I had to start using glasses about a year ago, at age 46. My distance vision - and that means anything over a metre - is not as good as it was, though I'd still be legal to drive without glasses.
Under a meter, I have to take them off, I can't possibly read with them on. But my close-range vision is extremely acute.
I have no idea what's going to happen with my vision due to the weird hormonal problems that started 6 weeks ago, but my eyes have changed colour (!). Still, that's the least of my worries.
Posted by: Alan E Brain at June 14, 2005 09:13 PM (tAq8A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 10, 2005
The Carnival of the Recipes is up
News from the Great Beyond is hosting this week. Bon Apetit!
Posted by: Ted at
06:42 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Steve Cropper inducted into the Songwriter's Hall of Fame
My love of music is broad, but my knowlege is spotty. To me, Steve Cropper will always be one of the members of the the original Blues Brothers band.
Mention that he was a member of the classic Booker T and the MG's and I'll say "yeah, I'd heard that before, I think". But basically, it was Jake and Elwood and Mr. Natural and Matt "Guitar" Murphy and Donald "Duck" Dunn and Steve Cropper and the rest...
Which goes to show the genius displayed in putting together the Blues Brothers band. Those guys could
play, which made for a solid foundation for the comedy. Instead of being a one-shot joke with a lame-ass garage band, these guys lifted it into brilliance. They turned it into a franchise and taught an entire generation about the blues and soul by featuring guest stars like Cab Calloway, James Brown, B.B. King, Wilson Pickett, Taj Mahal, Bo Diddley and the entire composite super-band Louisiana Gator Boys featured at the end of
Blues Brothers 2000.
So Steve Cropper, already a member of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, will now be
inducted into the Songwriter's Hall of Fame, alongside John Fogerty and Isaac Hayes (think he'll do "Chocolate Salty Balls"?). Even if you didn't know Steve Cropper's name, you know his music. Songs like "Sittin' on the Dock of the Bay", "Knock on Wood", "Soul Man" and "In the Midnight Hour".
Yes indeed, you know his music.
Posted by: Ted at
06:09 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Ah, sittin' on the dock of the bay. That's a much better song to have in my head. ::whistling::
Posted by: shank at June 10, 2005 09:39 AM (+H1yK)
2
Bob (Of Bob's Country Bunker): That's some of the best damn music we had at the bunker in a long time...god dammit!
Jake: Sorry we didn't know 'The Wreck of the Ol' 97.'
Bob: That's alright, you can learn it for the next time y'all come back! Now, about the money you guys owe me for the beer.
Posted by: Paul at June 10, 2005 12:00 PM (vbP6L)
3
Pardon me ma`am but just what kind of music DO you enjoy here at your fine establishment?
Oh,we have BOTH kinds!Country AND Western.
Posted by: Russ at June 10, 2005 12:49 PM (ObxzR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Those little speedbumps in song lyrics
Something that really irritates me is when listening to a song and coming across something like this:
"I can't stay on your life support, there's a shortage in the switch" -- Pink, Just Like A Pill
I love that song, really I do. But I cringe every time I hear "
shortage in the switch". I realize that the tune flows better with that phrase, but c'mon, it's not slang or idiom, it's an intentional misuse of a word that makes it nonsense. You can have a
short in a switch, but not a
shortage.
Nitpicky? You bet.
Need another example? How about in Maria Muldaur's
Midnight at the Oasis. A very sexy song with a wonderful melody, sung by a singer with a great voice for it, and the word play and imaging is excellent. Oasis, sultan, camel, sheik, belly dancer, nomad, and so on, right up until the line:
Come on, Cactus is our friend
Cactus?!?!?!?! Where the hell did the cactus come from? I thought we were in a thousand and one Arabian nights, not a Roadrunner cartoon. You say cactus and I'm picturing the American southwest or Mexico. Your romantic camel just became a burro refusing to budge for no damn reason while Gabby Hayes mutters "dagnabbit". Talk about a mood breaker.
What about you? Got some song lyric that just grates on your nerves?
Posted by: Ted at
05:57 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
REM, 'losing my religion'. The lyric is '...consider this, consider this, the hint of the century..." Except the 'hint of the century' part is so garbled it's hard to understand. In truth, I didn't even know what he was saying until I looked it up just now. I always assumed he was singing in Mandarin or something "Hugh don't a cinch a weeeeee...."
But yeah, my pet peeve is lyrics that can't be made out. Eddie Vedder sings 'Yellow Ledbetter' in it's entirety in this fashion.
Posted by: shank at June 10, 2005 08:18 AM (+H1yK)
2
And now that REM song is in my head, and it's been there since I posted the above comment. Damn!
Posted by: shank at June 10, 2005 09:14 AM (+H1yK)
3
I kind of assumed the cactus was peyote...
As for stupid lyrics, in the otherwise excellent Hotel California;
"Please give me my wine.. we haven't had that SPIRIT here since 1969."
Wines are not spirits! Vintage would have scanned perfectly and been appropriate. Which is a mighty small nit in one of my favorite songs.
Posted by: Jim Gwyn at June 10, 2005 09:38 AM (9ZxRw)
4
From "I Melt With You":
Moving forward using all my breath
Making love to you was never second best
I saw the world crashing all around your face
Never really knowing it was always mesh and lace
HATE IT! I think it's the whole pretentious art-school reject whiny emo-boy sound of it, plus the forced-into-meter thing.
I tell you how much I hate this song... Tom Hanks *genuflect* could mime it and I'd still spit.
Posted by: LeeAnn at June 10, 2005 02:50 PM (v9jcm)
5
"Lady In Red". UGH! But, it's not even the lyric so much as the way the singer pronounces "dance" as "dahnce" (snooty English accent) but then rhymes it with "romance" in an American accent. What the huh?!
And I like Joni Mitchell and all, but in her song "For Free" she pronounces "jewels" as two two syllables, "jewwwww- wels", and then has to pronounce "schools" as "schoooo- wels" to make it rhyme. Rediculous!
And as fer misunderstood lyrics, in the song "Jet", Paul McCartney sings "I thought the only place was on the moon" but for years I thought the line was ?I thought the only lonely FACE was on the moon," which I think is a better line!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at June 12, 2005 11:55 AM (nOyDe)
6
Rod Stewart, "Tonight's the Night."
When he gets to the part, "Just let your inhibitions run wild" I think, if she does that, he's NEVER getting any.
Posted by: wheels at June 16, 2005 11:21 PM (8df8f)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cool Stamps
Yesterday at the Post Office, I found this set of stamps that display some striking examples of American architecture.
Very cool.
Posted by: Ted at
04:38 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
June 09, 2005
Since it popped outta my brain, I may as well take credit for it
Combine two trendy Japanese passtimes, and you'd have:
Kariokekakke
Inspired by
Squipper's "caption this" post.
Posted by: Ted at
08:18 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
I got mine!
A friend of mine is selling these on eBay.
I bought one for my wife's car (lifelong Orioles fan), Mookie wants a couple for school notebooks, and I'm gonna put one on a rocket.
The price is extremely reasonable, and includes free shipping. Why don't you have one already?
Tell him
Rocket Jones sent you.
Posted by: Ted at
07:30 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
Not just sox and orioles fans. Indians fans also hate the Yankees. In fact, all right thinking sentient creatures hate the Yankees. If we met aliens, and explained the situation to them, they would hate the Yankees, too.
My mom will really like this. Heh.
Posted by: buckethead at June 10, 2005 12:34 PM (NfIvb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
'Rithmetic 'bout Readin' and Writin'
I'm going to start you with a quote:
Across California, children are bringing home notes warning of dire consequences if Gov. Schwarzenegger’s scorched earth budget is approved – a budget that slashes Proposition 98 public school spending from $42.2 billion this year all the way down to $44.7 billion next year. That should be proof enough that our math programs are suffering.
That's the beginning of an article penned by Senator McClintock, who represents the 19th district in the California Legislature (
his website here). In this article, he goes on to itemize funding for a hypothetical school of 180 students with a budget of $1.2 million to get through the year.
I have nitpicks with some of his numbers, but overall I think he's on target. Among his hypothetical suggestions:
- lease commercial office space for classrooms (which includes "washrooms, around-the-clock janitorial service, wall-to-wall carpeting, utilities and music in the elevators")
- hiring 5 teachers ("but not just any teachers. I propose hiring only associate professors from the California State University at their level of pay")
- replacing in-school PE classes with fully-funded annual memberships to a local gym ("This would provide our children with a trained and courteous staff of nutrition and fitness counselors, aerobics classes and the latest in cardiovascular training technology")
There's so much more worth reading. This guy isn't anti-education or anti-teacher, he's anti-teacher's
union, and he makes his points with common sense.
He starts his conclusion with this:
The school I have just described is the school we’re paying for. Maybe it’s time to ask why it’s not the school we’re getting.
Mucho thanks to
Jay at Sophont for pointing this one out. In fact, he's been very very good lately, and you should just
start at the top and scroll on down to see everything.
Posted by: Ted at
11:41 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
gee thankx for the complement.
I got that link via jerrypournelle.com.
He's been doing some intresting writings on education lately.
I happen to work in a NYC public high school, and after thinking about it, there's LOTS that the senator is leaving out. Like does his quoted salary figure include benefits/taxes (typically add 30%), and only 5 teachers is an overcrowded classroom.
Posted by: jayrtfm at June 09, 2005 10:28 PM (dvb0v)
2
I agree that there's a lot not included. No extracurricular activities like sports and clubs, and no mention of feeding (subsidized or otherwise). Still, the premise is right on and makes the point. We spend entirely too much on the educational "experience" and not enough on the education part.
Posted by: Ted at June 10, 2005 04:50 AM (+OVgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
This could replace Nog Watch
I'm *still* getting comments and email about my posts on stripper music. If you Google "Stripper Music", Rocket Jones comes up #1.
No idea what I'm talking about? Follow that link and read the comments, then let everyone know what your favorite music is to watch and/or dance to.
Posted by: Ted at
06:06 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
Michael Jackson
I don't think I've mentioned my view of the whole spectacle.
When that much money is involved, I start with the assumption that
everyone is lying. Since I can't see for myself the mannerisms and reactions of the parties involved, forming any opinion would just be shooting off my mouth.
I have to trust the system to do the right thing.
Posted by: Ted at
05:20 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
1
The thing that bothers me the most about the case is that one way or another, some adult has been taking advantage of the kid. Regardless of the legal outcome, I hope he ends up getting help.
Posted by: nic at June 09, 2005 08:31 AM (JijW0)
2
Nic: agreed, the kids been taken advantage of, after being most likely used as a way to get to know Michael Jackson. I mean, who in their right mind lets their little kid sleep in the same room and bed as a strange full grown man (albeit pop star)? I call neglect and abuse ... on both sides.
Posted by: Oorgo at June 09, 2005 11:32 AM (lM0qs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Something you don't see every day
Fellow Munuvian Ogre has a horizontal blog.
Posted by: Ted at
04:35 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
| Trackbacks (Suck)
<< Page 74 >>
Processing 0.01, elapsed 0.4447 seconds.
37 queries taking 0.4389 seconds, 63 records returned.
Page size 48 kb.
Powered by Minx 0.8 beta.